Gender differences in omani students' perception of the pedagogical content knowledge of their science teachers as appeared in reality and students' preferences

Abdullah Ambusaidi; Fatemah  Al-Hajri; Maryam  Al-Mahrooqi

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Abdullah Ambusaidi MoE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1463-0209
Fatemah Al-Hajri Ministry of Education
Maryam Al-Mahrooqi Ministry of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Science teacher, PCK, Student' Perception, Desirability, Gender

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate gender differences in Omani 10th-grade students' perception of their science teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) in both realities and as they desired. Two versions of electronic questionnaires consisting of sixteen main items were designed to achieve the aims of this study. These two versions were administrated to 1445 randomly selected students from various schools at four educational governorates in Oman. For the first version, 46.7% of the participants were female students and 53.3% were male students; whereas, for the second version, 54.7% were female and 45.3% were male. The results showed that Omani male students gave a higher appreciation of “the actual PCK” in most elements compared to female students for “the actual pedagogical knowledge of their teachers” except for two elements which were "fun and simple in their personality" and "inform students' parents about their progress and achievement in science”. This estimation seemed to be unrealistic for male students because it did not reflect their real achievement. The results also demonstrated variation in preferences related to the learning environment between male and female students. Male students preferred a competitive environment, while female students preferred a collaborative and open environment. In the light of current research’s results, some recommendations were proposed such as conducting teacher training programs about supportive learning environments in their classroom and doing furthermore studies related to PCK in the science field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Rujaibi, Y. S., Hammo, M. S., & Aboud, D. (2019). Relationship between perceived fam ily violence and aggressive behavior in children aged 11-15 in view of the level of education and income of parents in Sultanate of Oman. of, 10, 2.

Al-Balushi, S.M. & Al-Battashi, I.A. (2013). Ninth graders’ spatial ability and working memory capacity (WMC) in relation to their science and mathematics achievement and their gender. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 10(1). 12–27.

Al-Bloushi, S. & Al-Rowahi, N. (2011). Investigating Omani Physical and science teachers' beliefs in cooperative learning using theory of planned behavior. Educational Journal, 101(26), 285 -322.

Al-Balushi, S. M., Ambusaidi, A. K., Al-Balushi, K. A., Al-Hajri, F. H., & Al-Sinani, M. S. (2020). Student-centred and teacher-centred science classrooms as visualized by science teachers and their supervisors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103014

Al-Busaidi, F. & Al-Jazari, A. (2010).The use of educational technology and learning resources centers in the basic education schools in the Sultanate of Oman and preparing a plan for their activation: An analytical study of the reality of using educational technology and learning resources centers in light of international standards. Message of Education - Sultanate of Oman, 27, 74-87. http://search.mandumah.com/Record/58905

Al-Harthi, A. (2011). The relationship between science teacher’s beliefs about the use of inquiry based learning strategy and their classroom practices. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Sultan Qaboos University.

Al Jabri, M., Silvennoinen, H., & Griffiths, D. (2018). Teachers’ professional development in Oman: Challenges, efforts and solutions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(5), 82-103.

Al Khatib, J. M. (2007). A survey of general education teachers' knowledge of learning disabilities in Jordan. International Journal of Special Education, 22(1), 72-76.

Al-Saidi, A. (2010). The role of school administration in confronting the phenomenon of school violence among students of basic education in the Sultanate of Oman. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Mutah University. http://search.mandumah.com/Record/786106.

Al-Shabibi, A. S. & Silvennoinen, H. (2018). challenges in education system affecting teacher professional development in Oman. Athens Journal of Education, 5(3), 261-282.

Ambusaidi, A. (2013). 12th grade students' estimations of science teachers' possession of active teacher traits and their relation to some educational variables. Mu'tah Research and Studies, 2(28), 313342

Ambusaidi, A. K., & Al-Balushi, S. M. (2012). A Longitudinal Study to Identify Prospective Science Teachers' Beliefs about Science Teaching Using the Draw-a-Science-Teacher-Test Checklist. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(2), 291-311.

Ambusaidi, A. & Al-Hajri, F. (2013). Estimation of the importance of pedagogical content knowledge in science from the perspective of a sample of teachers in the Sultanate of Oman. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 40, 328-343.

Ambusaidi, A., Al-Hajri, F., & Al-Mahrouqi, M. (2020). The difference between reality and desirability in science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge as perceived by their students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 15(5), 1011-1029. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i5.4097.

Bailey, L. E. & Graves, K. (2016). Gender and education. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 682-722.

Booth, I. (2014). Primary school teachers perceptions of gender based differences. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Massey University.

Cho, I. (2012). The effect of teacher–student gender matching: Evidence from OECD countries. Economics of Education Review, 31(3), 54-67.

Darby, L. (2005). Science students' perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35(4), 425-445.

Eliasson, N., Sørensen, H. & Karlsson, K. (2016). Teacher–student interaction in contemporary science classrooms: is participation still a question of gender? International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1655-1672. 10.1080/09500693.2016.1213457.

Erinosho, S. Y. (1999). Gender differences in interests and performance of high school science students: A Nigerian example. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25(2), 163-71.

Fisher, D. L. & Fraser, B. J. (1983). A comparison of actual and preferred classroom environments as perceived by science teachers and students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), 55-61.

Fraser, B. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research 1. 7–33.

Fernandez-Balboa, J. M. & Stieh, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00030-A

Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. GessNewsome and N. G. Nederman (Eds.). Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3-17). Kluwer.

Hastedt, D., Eck, M., Kim, E., & Sass, J., (2021). Female science and mathematics teachers: Better than they think? IEA Compass: Briefs in Education No. 13. IEA.

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1−51.

Halim, L., Abdullah, S. & Meerah, T. (2014). Students' perceptions of their science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education Technology, 23, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9484-2

Haroun, R.; Ng, D.; Abdelfattah, F. & AlSalouli, M. (2016). Gender difference in teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching in the context of Single-Sex classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 383–396. 10.1007/s10763-015-9631-8.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Igbo, J. N., Onu, V. C. & Obiyo, N. O. (2015). Impact of gender stereotype on secondary school students’ selfconcept and academic achievement. SAGE Open. DOI. 10.1177/2158244015573934.

Istiyono, E., Widihastuti, S. & Hamdi, S. (2020). Measuring creative thinking skills of senior high school male and female students in physics (CTSP) using the IRT-based PhysTCreTS. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 578-590.

Jang, S. (2010). Assessing college students' perceptions of a case teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge using a newly developed instrument. Higher Education, 61. 663–678. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-010-9355-1.

Jang, S. J., & Chang, Y. (2016). Exploring the technical pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) of Taiwanese university physics instructors. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1).

Kaya, V., Altuk. Y., & Bahceci, D. (2012). Elementary school students' views and images concerning science teachers. Social and Behavioral Sciences 47, 433–438. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.676

Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome; N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132), Kluwer,

Marni, S., Aliman, M., & Harslatti, T. (2020). Students’ critical thinking skills based on gender and knowledge group. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 544-560.

Martin, M., Mullis, I., Foy, P. & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in science: Eight grade science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., Kelly, D. & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Organization for Economic Coordination and Development (OECD) (2009). Equally prepared for life.

How 15-year-old boys and girls perform in school. http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/50/42843625.pdf.

Organization for Economic Coordination and Development (OECD) (2016). PISA 2015 Results in Focus.

http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/50/42843625.pdf. Organization for Economic Coordination and Development (OECD) (2020). “Girls’ and boys’ performance in PISA”, in PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed, OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/f56f8c26-en

Quinn, D. M., & Cooc, N. (2015). Science achievement gaps by gender and race/ethnicity in elementary and middle school: Trends and predictors. Educational Researcher, 44(6), 336-346.

Reychav, I., & McHaney, R. (2017). The relationship between gender and mobile technology use in collaborative learning settings: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 113, 61-74.

Scantlebury, K. (2012). Still part of the conversation: Gender issues in science education. In B.J. Fraser et al. (eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education, Springer International Handbooks of Education 24, 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_34.

Shadreck, M. & Isaac, M. (2012). Science teacher quality and effectiveness: Gweru urban junior secondary school students' points of view. Asian Social Science, 8(8), 160–165. doi:10.5539/ass.v8n8p160.

Shin, J., Lee, H., McCarthy-Donovan, A., Hwang, H.; Yim, S., & Seo, E. (2015). Home and motivational factors related to science-career pursuit: Gender differences and gender similarities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(9), 1478-1503. 10.1080/09500693.2015.1042941

Sinnes, A. T. (2006). Three approaches to gender equity in science education. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–6.

Slater, J. A., Lujan, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2007). Does gender influence learning style preferences of first-year medical students? Advances in physiology education, 31(4), 336-342.

Spilt, J., Koomen, H., & Jak, S. (2012). Are boys better off with male and girls with female teachers? A multilevel investigation of measurement invariance and gender match in teacher–student relationship quality. Journal of School Psychology 50, 363–378.

Smith, T., Pasero, S. & McKenna, C. (2014). Gender effects on student attitude toward science. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 34(1-2). 7 –12.

van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)10982736(199808)35:6%3C673::AID-TEA5%3E3.0.CO;2-J

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] (2016). Global Education Monitoring Report 2016: Gender Review. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002460/246045e.pdf.

United Nations (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:A_RES_71_313_E.pdf.

Watt, H., Richardson, P. & Devos, C. (2012). How does gender matter in the choice of a STEM teaching career and later teaching behaviours? International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(5).187-206.

Zeeuw, E., van Beijsterveldt, C., Glasner, T., Bartels, M., de Geus, E., & Boomsma, D. (2014). Do children perform and behave better at school when taught by same-gender teachers? Learning and Individual Differences, 36(2014). 152–156.

Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H., Harder, B., Park, K., Portešová, S., & Porath, M. (2014). Gender differences in mathematics and science: the role of the actiotope in determining individuals’ achievements and confidence in their own abilities. High Ability Studies, 25(1). 35-51. 10.1080/13598139.2014.916092