A  Qualitative study to explain middle school student’s understandings of nature of science

Mehmet  Küçük; Salih Çepni

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Mehmet Küçük Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize-TURKEY
Salih Çepni Bursa Uludag University, Bursa-TURKEY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Science, Nature of Science, Turkish Middle School Students

Abstract

This study was conducted with the aim to explain 7th grade middle school students’ nature of science understandings by employing qualitative measuring tools of an interview and a questionnaire. In this context, the participants were 17 7th grade students. In order to explain the participants’ nature of science understandings, first a nature of science questionnaire to explain their nature of science was conducted. Following, in depth interviews were conducted with the students. The four facets of the students’ nature of science understandings were categorized using three dimensions: informed-transitional-naïve and by constantly comparing the data. The results gathered by the aforementioned analysis indicated that most students’ nature of science understandings were weak or varying (78%) and only 22% of the students had adequate understandings. In this respect, it is suggested that the direct-reflective methods should be used instead of indirect ones for students to understand the real nature of science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AAAS. (1993). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061: Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.

Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., & Donnelly, L. A. (2008). Early childhood teachers’ views of nature of science: The influence of intellectual levels, cultural values, and explicit reflective teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 748–770

Bady, R. A (1979). Students’ understanding of the logic of hypothesis testing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16, 61-65.

Bell, R.L., & Matkins, J.J. (2003). Learning about the nature of science in an elementary science methods course: content vs. context. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Philadelphia, Pa.

Boujaoude, S. (1996). Epistemology and Sociology of Science According to Lebanese Educators and Students, Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St.Louis, Mo.

Brickhouse, N.W., Dagher, Z.R., Letts, W.J., & Shipman, H.L. (2000). Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the ınterface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 340-362.

Çelik, S., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2004). Öğretmen adaylarının bilim anlayışları ve “fen, teknoloji ve toplum” dersinin bu anlayışlara etkisi. VI. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

Clough, M.P., & Olson, J.K. (2001). Structure of a course promoting contextualized and decontextualized nature of science ınstruction. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers, St.Louis, MO.

Clough, M.P. (2003). Explicit but insufficient: additional considerations for successful nos ınstruction. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers, St.Louis, MO.

Demirdöğen, B., Hanuscin, D.L., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E. & Köseoğlu, F. (2015). Development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in Science Education, doi: 10.1007/s11165-015-9472-z

Deng, F., Chai, C.S., Tsai, C., Lin. T. (2014). Assessing South China (Guangzhou) high school students’ views on nature of science: a validation study. Science & Education, 23, 843-863

Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young People's Images of Science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Govett, A.L. (2001). Teacher’s Conception of the Nature of Science: Analyzing the Impact of A Teacher Enhancement Program in Changing Attitudes And Perceptions of Science And Scientific Research (Unpublished Phd Thesis). College of Human Resources And Education, West Virginia University.

Hammer, D. (1994). Epistomological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151–183.

Hogan, K. (1999). Relating students’ personal frameworks for science curriculum. Science Education, 72, 19–40.

Jungwirth, E. (1970). An evaluation of attained development of the ıntellectual skills needed for understanding of the nature of scientific ınquiry by BSCS pupils ın Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 141-151.

Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus ımplicit ınquiry-oriented ınstruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578.

Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2003). The development of students’ conceptions of nature of science. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, Il.

Khishfe, R.F. (2004). Relationship between students’ understandings of nature of science and ınstructional context. (Unpublished Phd thesis). Graduate College of The Illinois Institute of Technology. Chicago, Illinois.

Khishfe, R.F. (2015a). Relationship between nature of science understandings and argumentation skills: A role for counterargument and contextual factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 489-514

Khishfe, R.F. (2015b). A look into students’ retention of acquired nature of science understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 37 (10), 1639-1667

Kılıç, K., Sungur, S., Çakıroğlu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2005). Ninth grade students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 127-133.

Lecompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. (2nd Ed). San Diego: Academic Press.

Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.

Lederman, N.G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916–929.

Macaroglu, E., Taşar, M. F., & Cataloglu, E. (1998). Turkish preservice elementary school teachers' beliefs about the nature of science. Annual Meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Diego, CA.

Mccomas, W. (1996). Ten myths of science: reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 10-16.

Mcnabb, D.E. (2002). Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, Newyork.

MEB. (2005). İlköğretim Fen Ve Teknoloji Dersi Öğretim Programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.

Meichtry, Y.J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 389- 407.

Moss, D.M., Abrams, E.D., & Kull, J.R. (1998). Describing students conceptions of the nature of science over an entire school years. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Diego, CA.

Moss, D.M., Abrams, E.D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771-790.

Murcia, K., & Schibeci, R. (1999). Primary student teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1123-1140.

NRC (1996). National Research Council, National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

Oyman, N.Y. (2002). İlköğretim Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenlerinin Bilimin Doğası Hakkındaki Anlayışlarının Tespiti. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

Peters, E. E. (2012). Developing content knowledge in students through explicit teaching of the nature of sceince: Influences of goal setting and self-monitoring. Science & Education, 21, 881-898

Roth, W.M., & Roychoudhury, A. (2003). Physics students’ epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 114–139.

Rubba, P., Horner, J. K., & Smith, J. M. (1981). A study of two misconceptions about the nature of science among junior high school students. School Science and Mathematics, 81, 221-226.

Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 18, 561–580.

Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G.S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559-580.

Sandoval, W.A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students’ ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369-392.

Scharmann, L.C. (1988a). Locus of control: a discriminator of the ability to foster an understanding of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 72, 453-465.

Scharmann, L. C. (1988b). The influence of sequenced instructional strategy and locus of control on preservice elementary teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 589-604.

Smith, C. L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M.G. (2000). Sixth-grade students’ epistemologies of science: the impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 349-422.

Songer, N.B., & Linn, M.C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761–784.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures And Techniques. Ondon: Sage Publications.

Taşar, M.F. (2003). Teaching history and the nature of science in science teacher education programs. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(13), 30-42.

Tsai, C.-C. (1999). The progression toward constructivist epistemological views of science: a case study of the STS instruction of Taiwanese high school female students. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1201-1222.

Wahbeh, N. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: Teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 425-466.

Yakmacı-Güzel, B. (2000). Fen alanı (biyoloji, kimya ve fizik) öğretmenlerinin bilimsel okuryazarlığın bir boyutu olan “bilimin doğası” hakkındaki görüşleriyle ilgili bir tarama çalışması. IV. Fen Bilimleri Ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.