Low socioeconomic status students' STEM career ınterest in relation to gender, grade level, and STEM attitude*
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/Keywords:
Middle School, Socioeconomic Status, STEM Attitude, STEM Career Interest, STEM EducationAbstract
This study investigated low socioeconomic status middle school students' STEM career interest (in areas of physical science, life science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) in relation to demographic variables of gender and grade level and also attitudes towards STEM areas (science, math, engineering, and 21st century skills). The sample of the study consisted of 263 sixth, seventh, and eighth grade students attending one of five middle schools located in the rural areas of a city in the northeast region of Turkey. Analysis results showed that students had positive feelings in having a STEM career and these perceptions did not differ in terms of gender and grade level. Moreover, students' STEM career interest was high for both males and females. Among three grade levels, there was no significant difference in terms of STEM career interest, except for life science. Besides, canonical correlation analysis showed that students' career interest in STEM was positively related to students' attitudes towards STEM fields. Turkish low socioeconomic status middle school students have limited information about STEM career options and they should be given sufficient guidance about STEM occupations during middle school years. Additionally, we suggest investigating the ways of enhancing students' STEM career interest in further studies.
Downloads
References
Career choice of parents is “doctor” [Ailelerin meslek tercihi “doktorluk”] (2013; March 21). Hurriyet. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ailelerin-meslek-tercihi-doktorluk-22865770
Astin, A. W., &Astin, H. S. (1992). Undergraduate science education: The impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences. Final Report. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.
Bonous-Harnmarth, M. (2000). Pathways to success: Affirming opportunities for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 92-111.
Cantürk, S. (2016, April 6). Eğitimde yeni dönem: STEM metodu [New trend in education: STEM method]. Sabah, retrieved from http://www.sabah.com.tr/egitim/2016/04/06/egitimde-yeni-donem-stem-metodu.
Correl, S. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106 (6), 1691-1730.
Çalık, M., Ültay, N., Kolomuç, A., & Aytar, A. (2015). A cross-age study of science student teachers' chemistry attitudes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 228-236.
Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, M. R., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
Dick, T. P., & Rallis, S. F. (1991). Factors and influences on high school students' career choices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(4), 281-292.
Friday Institute for Educational Innovation (2012). Middle/High School Student Attitudes toward STEM Survey. Raleigh, NC: Author.
Gustafsson, J. E., Hansen, K., &Rosén, M. (2011). Effects of home background on student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science at the fourth grade. TIMSS and PIRLS, 181-287.
Korkut- Owen, F., Kelecioğlu, H., & Owen, D. W. (2014). Cinsiyetlere göre üniversitelerdeki onbir yıllık eğilim: Kariyer danışmanlığı için doğurgular. [A decade of change gender trends in university enrollment: Implications for career counseling]. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(1), 794-813.
Korkut-Owen, F., Kepir, D. D., Özdemir, S., Ulaş, Ö & Yılmaz, O. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin bölüm seçme nedenleri. [Reasons for University Students’ Program Choice]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 8(3), 135-151.
Lamb, R., Akmal, T., & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of a cognition-priming model describing learning in a STEM classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 410-437.
Lent, R., Brown, S., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36- 49.
Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relations of self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 328-335.
Lederman, L. M. (2008). Scientists and 21st century science education. Technology in Society, 30(3), 397-400.
Leslie, L. L., McClure, G. T., & Oaxaca, R. L. (1998). Women and minorities in science and engineering: A life sequence analysis. Journal of Higher Education, 69(3), 239-276.
MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. S. (2013). Academic self-efficacy an performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, andsocialclasspatterns. Analyses of SocialIssues and Public Policy, 13(1), 347-369.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907.
McMahon, M. M., & Showers, T. T. (2012). Partnering for Success in the 21st Century. In Advancing the STEM Agenda: Quality Improvement Supports STEM: Selected Papers from the 2011 Advancing the STEM Agenda in Education, the Workplace and Society Conference at the University of Wisconsin-Stout, July, 2011 (p. 29). ASQ Quality Press.
Milner, D. I., Horan, J. J., & Tracey, T. J. (2013). Development and evaluation of STEM Interest and Self-Efficacy Tests. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(4), 642-653.
Ministry of National Education (2013). PISA 2012 National pre-project report. Ankara
Ministry of National Education (2005). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi 4. ve 5. sınıflar öğretim programı [Primary schools science and technology education program for grades 4 and 5]. Ankara, Turkey.
Ministry of National Education (2013). İlköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Primary and Middle School Science Curricula (Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8)]. Ankara, Turkey.
Outlook, O. S. (2013). First results from the survey of adult skills. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
Özden, M. (2007). Problems with science and technology education in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 157-161.
Peterman, K., Kermish-Allen, R., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2016). Measuring student career interest within the context of Technology-Enhanced STEM Projects: A cross-project comparison study based on the Career Interest Questionnaire. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-13.
PISA, O. (2012). Results in focus what 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know, 2014-12-03]. Retrieved from http:////www.oecd.org/pisa,/keyfindings,/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents' future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95(3), 458-476.
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96, 411-427.
Sarıer, Y. (2010). An evaluation of equal opportunities in education in the light of high school entrance exams (OKS-SBS) and PISA results. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3), 107-129.
Sarıkaya, T., & Khorshid, L. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimini etkileyen etmenlerin incelenmesi: Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi [Investigation of the factors influencing university students’ career choices: Career choice of university students] Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 393-423.
Shaw, E. J., & Barbuti, S. (2010). Patterns of persistence in intended college major with a focus on STEM majors. NACADA Journal, 30(2), 19-34.
Şenler, B., & Sungur, S. (2009). Parental influences on students' self-concept, task value beliefs, and achievement in science. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 106-117.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th international edition (cover. ed.). Boston, [Mass.]; London: Pearson.
Tyler-Wood, T., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2010). Instruments for assessing interest in STEM content and careers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 341-363.
Unfried, A., Faber, M., & Wiebe, E. (2014). Gender and student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7) 622–639
Ülkar, E. (2016, January 18). Kodlama ders oluyor [Software coding is going to be a course]. Hurriyet. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/kodlama-ders-oluyor-40041977
Yeşilyaprak, B. (2012). The paradigm shift of vocational guidance and career counseling and its implications for Turkey: An evaluation from past to future. [Mesleki rehberlik ve kariyer danışmanlığında paradigm değişimi ve Türkiye açısından sonuçlar: Geçmişten geleceğe yönelik bir değerlendirme]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 111-118.
Xie, Y., & Reider, D. (2014). Integration of innovative technologies for enhancing students’ motivation for science learning and career. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 370-380.
Yıldırım, B., & Selvi, M. (2015). Adaptation of Stem Attitude Scale to Turkish, Turkish Studies- International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(3), 1107-1120.
Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387-398.
Downloads
Issue
Section
Published
Versions
- 15.07.2016 (2)
- 15.07.2016 (1)
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.