“Unless you Ccan explain”: Voices of graduate students and their professor regarding the ımportance of science communication course

Nadi Suprapto; Chih-Hsiung Ku; Te-Sheng Chang

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Nadi Suprapto Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Chih-Hsiung Ku National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan
Te-Sheng Chang National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

graduate students, Professor, science communication

Abstract

This study aimed to analyse the experiences of graduate students and their Professor deal with science communication courses. Capturing the nature and the pedagogic experiences of the courses and also describing the hot issues around them were the main focus of this study. By using a constructivist approach, eight graduate students and one Professor of science education program at a public university in the East of Taiwan submitted participant qualitative interviews to discuss their learning experiences in the courses. The findings revealed that first; science communication bridges the gap between people and science communities and includes communication between various other longer-established academic domains. Second, science communication is about interpersonal and public communication among and by science professionals. Third, it emphasises the importance of communicative pedagogy: instructional design, media and technology, classroom management, interpersonal interaction, and assessment. Fourth, the hot issue around science communication can be reviewed from science content, nature of science, and social cognition theory. This study pinpoints the position of science, communication, and science communication as a package in which giving a linkage between scientists and science communicators as collective roles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, S. E. (2013). Learning experience. http://edglossary.org/learning-experience/.

Aberšek, B., & Aberšek, M. K. (2010). Development of communication training paradigm for engineers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(2), 99-108. http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1405171312.pdf

Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Science communication with the public: A cross-cultural event. In S. M. Stocklmayer, M. M. Gore, & C. Bryant (Eds.), Science communication in theory and practice, (pp 23–45). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0620-0_2

Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., & Donaghue, N. (2006). Social cognition: An integrated introduction (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.

Bahreini, K., Nadolski, R., & Westera, W. (2017). Communication skills training exploiting multimodal emotion recognition. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 1065-1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1247286

Besley, J. C., & Tanner, A. H. (2011). What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Science Communication, 33(2), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010386972

Bowater, L., & Yeoman, K. (2013). Science communication: A practical guide for scientists. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Brainyquote. (2020). Albert Einstein quotes. https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/albert_einstein_383803

Bray, B., France, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2012). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say?. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.611627

Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates’ perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(1), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2012

Burns, T. W., O’Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625030122004

Çepni, S., Kara, Y. & Cil, E. (2012). Middle school science and items of high school entrance examination: Examining the gap in Turkey. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 40(3), 501-511.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Cheek, D. W. (2015). A panoramic view of the future of learning and the role of design(ers) in such experiences. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience: Creating the future of educational technology, (pp 4-37). Switzerland, AG: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_2

Cheng, V. M. Y. (2010). Teaching creative thinking in regular science lessons: Potentials and obstacles of three different approaches in an Asian context. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), Article 17.

Chilvers, J., Lorenzoni, I., Terry, G., Buckley, P., Pinnegar, J. K., & Gelcich, S. (2014). Public engagement with marine climate change issues: (Re)framings, understandings and responses. Global Environmental Change, 29, 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.006

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Edmondston, J., & Dawson, V. (2014). Perspectives of science communication training held by lecturers of biotechnology and science communication. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2013.793433

Espejaa, A. G., & Lagaróna, D. C. (2015). Socio-scientific issues (SSI) in initial training of primary school teachers: Pre-service teachers’ conceptualization of SSI and appreciation of the value of teaching SSI. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 196, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.015

Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00779.x

Friedman, D. B., Toumey, C., Porter, D. E., Hong, J., Scott, G. I., & Lead, J. R. (2015). Communicating with the public about environmental health risks: A community-engaged approach to dialogue about metal speciation and toxicity. Environment International, 74, 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.09.015

Goodreads. (2020). Albert Einstein quotes. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/271951-you-do-not-really-understand-something-unless-you-can-explain

Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

Ho, W.-C. (2007). Music students’ perception of the use of multi-media technology at the graduate level in Hong Kong higher education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.09.015

Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.

Huang, C.-J. (2011). The development of internet use for communication among undergraduate students: A multilevel analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9127-8

Jones, S., Yates, B., & Kelder, J. A. (2011). Learning and teaching academic standards project: Science learning and teaching academic standards statement. Retrieved from ABDC: http://www.abdc.edu.au/data/Accounting_LS/Accounting_Learning_Standards_-_February_2011.pdf.

Kaminski, K. (2015). Designing instruction through cognitive theory, problem solving, and learning transfer: An ethnographic case study. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience: Creating the future of educational technology, (pp 4–37). Switzerland, AG: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_3

Kayrooz, C., & Trevitt, C. (2005). Research in organisations and communities: Tales from the real world. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Kılınç, A., Kartal, T. Eroğlu, B., Demiral, Ü., Afacan, Ö., Polat, D., Guler, M. P. D., & Görgülü, Ö. (2013). Preservice Science Teachers’ Efficacy Regarding a Socioscientific Issue: A Belief System Approach. Research in Science Education, 43, 2455-2475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9368-8

Knight, D. (2006). Public understanding of science: A history of communicating scientific ideas. New York, NY: Routledge.

Krathwohl, D. R. (1997). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Lakhvich, T. (2014). Science and communication: How to transfer knowledge?. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(5), 592–595. http://oaji.net/articles/2015/987-1450980809.pdf

Lam, F. (2011). The Socratic method as an approach to learning and its benefits. Carnegie Mellon University: Dietrich College Honors Theses. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1126&context=hsshonors.

Lee, Y.-C. (2008). Exploring the roles and nature of science: A case study of severe acute respiratory syndrome. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 515-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701223368

Lin, T.-J, Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). Identifying Taiwanese university students’ physics learning profiles and their role in physics learning self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 605-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9440-z

Madueño Serrano, M. L., Márquez Ibarra, L. & Manig Valenzuela, A. (2020). The engineering professors’ teaching identity formation as university teachers: A process of sociocultural construction. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 504-519. doi: 10.36681/tused.2020.41

Majid, N. A., Jelas, Z. M., Azman, N., & Rahman, S. (2010). Communication skills and work motivation amongst expert teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 565-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.075

Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2017). Core skills for effective science communication: A teaching resource for undergraduate science education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1113573

Mork, S. M. (2011). An interactive learning environment designed to increase the possibilities for learning and communicating about radioactivity. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820802651060

Mulder, H. A. J., Longnecker, N., & Davis, L. S. (2008). The state of science communication programs at universities around the world. Science Communication, 30(2), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008324878

Ogawa, M. (1998). Under the noble flag of ‘developing scientific and technological literacy’. Studies in Science Education, 31(1), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269808560116

Özay, E., Kaya, E., & Sezek, F. (2004). Application of a questionnaire to describe teacher communication behaviour and its association with students in science in Turkey. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2(6), 15-21. http://oaji.net/articles/2016/987-1482420157.pdf

Papadopoulos, G. A. (2015). Communicating to the general public earthquake prediction information: Lessons learned in Greece. In M. Wyss, & S. Peppoloni (Eds.), Geoethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences, (pp 223–239). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799935-7.00019-8

Pitiporntapin, S. (2013). Thai pre-service science teachers' practice of science communication in communities. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 14(2), Article 1.

Pitiporntapin, S., & Lankford, D. M. (2015). Using social media to promote pre-service science teachers’ practices of socio-scientific issue (SSI) - based teaching. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2), Article 3.

Priest, S. H. (2010). Coming of age in the academy? The status of our emerging field. Journal of Science Communication, 9(3), C06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.09030306

Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., & Birney, M. E. (2012). Communicating climate science: The role of perceived communicator’s motives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.09.002

Raviv, D. (2012). Encouraging divergent thinking. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. San Antonio, SA: American Society for Engineering Education.

Sarı, U., Duygu, E., Şen, Ö. F., & Kırındı, T. (2020). The Effect of STEM Education on Scientific Process Skills and STEM Awareness in Simulation Based Inquiry Learning Environment. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 387-405. doi: 10.36681/tused.2020.34

Shpancer, N. (2004). What makes classroom learning a worthwhile experience?. Thought and Action, The NEA Higher Education Journal (Winter), 23–35. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/img/PubThoughtAndAction/TAA_04Win_03.pdf.

Stocklmayer, S. M. (2001). The background to effective science communication with the public. In S. M. Stocklmayer, M. M. Gore, & C. Bryant (Eds.), Science communication in theory and practice, (pp 23–45). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0620-0_1

Sturloni, G. (2012). A lesson from L’Aquila: The risks of science (mis)communication. Journal of Science Communication, 11(4), Editorial. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.11040501

Suprapto, N. (2016). Students’ Attitudes towards STEM Education: Voices from Indonesian Junior High Schools. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Special Issue), 75-87. doi: 10.12973/tused.10172a

Suprapto, N., Chang, T.-S., & Ku, C.-H. (2017). Conception of learning physics and self-efficacy among Indonesian university students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(1), 7–19. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1493049396.pdf

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Trench, B., & Bucchi, M. (2010). Science communication, an emerging discipline. Journal of Science Communication, 9(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.09030303

van Pelt, S. C., Haasnoot, M., Arts, B., Ludwig, F., Swart, R., & Biesbroek, R. (2015). Communicating climate (change) uncertainties: Simulation games as boundary objects. Environmental Science Policy, 45, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.004

Wahlström, N. (2010). Learning to communicate or communicating to learn? A conceptual discussion on communication, meaning, and knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.495163

Wu, L. Y., Truong, N. M. Lu, H.-Y., Tseng, Y.-H., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Science-edu-communication: Trends reveal in 20 years of science communication research. Journal of Baltic Science Education,18(5), 793-805. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.793

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Zhang, Y.-T. (2015). To know the SARS. Taiwan: NTSEC. http://activity.ntsec.gov.tw/lifeworld/english/content/disease_cc12.html.