The Effectiveness of the 4MATteaching approach in enhancing conceptions of electricity in physics for female students in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Authors

  • Fayadh Hamed Alanazı

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Electricity, 4MAT teaching method, misconceptions, seventh-grade students, physics teaching

Abstract

This study sought to examine the impacts of the application of the McCarthy Model (4MAT) teaching approach in enhancing seventh-grade female students’ conceptions of electricity in physics. The study sample comprised a total of 41 female students, who were selected from two schools located in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s city of Aljouf. The sample was divided into two groups, comprising 20 and 21 students in the experimental and control groups, respectively. The students in the experimental group were taught the science content through the 4MAT teaching approach, while students in the control group were taught with a more traditional approach of teaching. In order to attain the study objectives, two different study tools were designed, a teacher guide centered on the 4MAT teaching approach and a knowledge test concerning the physics conceptions of electricity. The findings showed that statistically significant differences were observed in enhancing the conceptions of electricity in physics between the experimental group and the control group, with students in the experimental group found to perform better than students in the control group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahuja, O. P., Lim-Teo, S. K., & Lee, P. Y. (1998). Mathematics teachers’ perspective of their students’ learning in traditional calculus and its teaching strategies. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education: Research in Mathematical Education, 2(2), 89–108.

Ahuja, O. P., & Jahangiri, J. M. (2003). An integrated approach to teaching and learning college mathematics. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D:Research in Mathematical Education, 7(1), 11-24.

Alanazi, F.H. (2017). Effectiveness of the proposed training formative assessment programme and its impact on teaching style improvements of Saudi science teachers in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14 (1), 35-56.

Albalawy, F. (2012). Evaluation of the physics textbook for the first scientific secondary grade in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the problems that face students In its studying from perspective of teachers and educational supervisors. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Aldahmash, A. H., Mansour, N. S., Alshamrani, S. M., & Almohi, S. (2016). An analysis of activities in Saudi Arabian middle school science textbooks and workbooks for the inclusion of essential features of inquiry. Research in Science Education, 46(6), 879– 900.

Alhadaybeh, E., & Ambusaedy, A. (2016). The effect of using McCarthy model in improving reflective thinking and science achievement for grade 6th basic female students. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 12 (1), 1-15.

Alharby, K. (2013). The performance of secondary education graduates in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in basic cognitive abilities and skills. Journal of Education and Psychology, 41(1),125-144.

Asoko, H. (2002). Developing conceptual understanding in primary science. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 153-164.

Azam, M. (2016).The effectiveness of using McCarthy model (4 MAT) in acquisition the scientific concepts and developing the learning and thinking styles for 8th grade students. Retrieved fromhttps://www.minia.edu.eg/edu/images/Scientific-Journal/Fifthvolume-2016/Mahmoud-Ramadan.doc.

Beane, J. A. (2016). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Newyork, USA: Teachers College Press.

Blair, D., & Judah, S. S. (1990). Need a strong foundation for an interdisciplinary program? Try 4MAT! Educational Leadership, 48 (2), 37-38.

Borges, A. T., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 95–117.

Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441-458.

Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: a comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955- 970

Çepni, S., & Keleş, E. (2006). Turkish students’ conceptions about the simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 269-291.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.

Czerniak, C. M., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 395–411). New York, NY: Routledge.

Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys’ and girls’ interests in science: Have they changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22 (6), 557–570.

Ergin, S. (2011). Effects of the 4MAT instruction method on the achievement of high school students with different learning styles on the subjects of work, power and energy in physics education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi University Department of Physics Education, Ankara.

Ergin, S., & Atasoy, S. (2013). Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of 4MAT teaching method in removing pupils’ physics misconceptions of electricity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(6), 730-746.

Howard, C., & Cooke, V. (2014). Practical ideas for teaching primary science. Critical Publishing, Northwich.

Ghazal, R. (2016). The effectiveness of using format (4MAT) system in developing the scientific concepts and thinking skills among seventh graders in Gaza. Retrieved from http://library.iugaza.edu.ps/thesis/119485.pdf.

İdris, A., & İbrahim, B. (2015). The effect of the 4MAT learning model on the achievement and motivation of 7th grade students on the subject of particulate nature of matter and an examination of student opinions on the model. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(1), 1-21.

Jassim, A., Mahdi, A., & Kareem, E. (2016).The effect of using(4 MAT) model in acquiring biological concepts and their retention in female students of Second Intermediate Class. Retrieved fromhttps://www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId=126067.

Kind, V., &Taber, K. S. (2005). Science: teaching school subjects 11-19. London: Routledge.

Koba S., & Mitchell T. C. (2011). Hard-to-teach science concepts: A framework to support learners, grades 3–5. NSTA PRESS, pp. 5-6.

Kucukozer, H., & Kocakulah, S. (2007). Secondary school students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4 (1), 101-115.

McCarthy, B. (1987). What 4MAT training teaches us about staff development? Educational Leadership,42 (7), 61-68.

Morris S., & McCarthy, B. (1990). 4MAT in action II: sample lesson plans for use with the 4MAT system. Excel, Barrington.

Obeikan Education. (2012). General information. Retrieved from http://www.obeikaneducation.com/en/content/k-12-education.

Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Students’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: a focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (5), 441-467.

Osborne, R. (1983). Towards modifying children’s ideas about electric current. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1 (1), 73-83.

Özmen, H. (2011). Turkish primary students' conceptions about the particulate nature of matter. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6(1), 99-121.

Pruekpramool, C. (2011). The development of the science of sound in traditional Thai musical instruments interdisciplinary course for non-science upper secondary school students by using integrated teaching approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation ). Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand

Tatar, E., & Ramazan, D. (2009). The effect of the 4MAT method (learning styles and brain hemispheres) of instruction on achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(8), 1027-1036.

Teczan,G., & Guvenz, H. (2017). The effects of 4MAT teaching and whole brain model on academic achievement in science. Education and Science, 42(192), 303-325.

Wilkerson, R.M. & White, K.P. (1988). Effects of the 4MAT system of instruction on student’s achievement, retention and attitudes. The Elementary School Journal, 88(4), 357-368.

Wiser, M., & Smith, C. L. (2008). Learning and teaching about matter in grades K–8: When should the atomic–molecular theory be introduced? In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp.205–239). New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

Published

21.06.2020

How to Cite

Alanazı, F. H. . (2020). The Effectiveness of the 4MATteaching approach in enhancing conceptions of electricity in physics for female students in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 510

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.