Correlating beliefs and classroom practices of public school science teachers in abu dhabi, U.A.E.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/Keywords:
Beliefs, Emirati, Science teachers, Teaching practicesAbstract
The education system in Abu Dhabi, the capital city of the United Arab Emirates, has undergone radical changes over the past seven years. A major emphasis of these reforms has been to increase the degree to which students can self-motivate, inquire and carry out work independently. Nowhere is this more critical than in the subject of science, which has been historically taught in the U.A.E. as a didactic subject. The vision of Abu Dhabi‟s Educational Council (ADEC) is for science to be taught very differently with a focus on inquiry based learning, exploratory approaches and a facilitation of student autonomy to do this. Research on the relationship between teachers‟ belief systems and their classroom practices often (though not always) shows a positive correlation between the two. We explored whether this relationship was true for science teachers working within the challenging reforming education system in Abu Dhabi. We employed a survey questionnaire which asked teachers to rate belief statements about science learning and about their reported classroom practice. 248 teachers responded, the vast majority of whom reported beliefs in science which are well aligned with accepted „best practice‟ including the need for students to learn independently and using inquiry based approaches to learning. However, only a weak statistical correlation was found to exist between their beliefs and science classroom practices, due to constraints such as a lack of resources and lack of trained science lab assistants which they report as rendering them unable to practice their ideals about science teaching and learning. This research is significant for the scientific education community, particularly as it adds to the body of research describing teacher behavior amidst educational reforms.
Downloads
References
ADEC Science Curriculum Teacher Guidebook. (2013). Abu Dhabi Educational Council, Abu Dhabi.
ADEC New School Model Cycle 1 Teacher Guide. (2013). Abu Dhabi Educational Council, Abu Dhabi.
Atav, E. & Altunoglu, B.D. (2010). Pre-service teachers‟ views about their competencies in biology applications. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7 (1).
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Bas, G. (2012). Investigating the effects of multiple intelligences instruction strategy on students‟ academic achievement, self-directed learning levels and attitude towards science courses. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(2).
Bleicher, R.E. (2006). Nurturing confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 165-187.
Bryan, L.A., & Atwater, M.M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86(6), 821-839.
Crabtree, S.A. (2010). Engaging students from the United Arab Emirates in culturally responsive education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47 (1), 85-94.
De Souza, B.S.,& Marcos F.E. (1997). Physics teacher's attitudes: How do they affect the reality of the classroom and models for change? Connecting research in physics education with teacher education. Retrieved from: https://www.univie.ac.at/pluslucis/Archiv/ICPE/D2.html
Dickson, M. & Kadbey, H. (2014). “That‟s not the way I was taught science at school!” How pre-service primary teachers in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates are affected by their own schooling experience. Science Education International, 24(3), 332-350.
Dickson, M., Kadbey, H. & McMinn, M. (2014). Comparing Reported Classroom Practice in Public and Private Schools in the United Arab Emirates. Paper presented October 2014 at World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership, Prague, Republic of Czechoslovakia.
Enochs, L.G., Scharmann, L.C., & Riggs, I.M. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Education, 79(1), 63–75.
Ernest, P. (1998). The impact of beliefs on the eaching of mathematics. Paper presented at the 6th International Congress of Mathematical Education, Budapest, Hungary.
Feyzioglu, E.Y. (2012). Science Teachers‟ Beliefs as Barriers to Implementation of Constructivist- Based Education Reform. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(4), p.302-317.
Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V. & Hackling, M. (2008). Perceptions and pedagogy: Exploring the beliefs and practices of an effective primary science teacher. Teaching Science, 55 (2).
Guo, C. J. (2007). Issues in science learning: An international perspective. Handbook of research on science education, 227-256.
Haney, J., Czerniak, C. & Lumpe, A. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implentation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971-993.
Howit, C. (2007). Pre-Service Elementary Teachers' Perceptions of Factors in an Holistic Methods Course Influencing their Confidence in Teaching Science. Research in Science Education, 37, 41-58.
Ireland, J.E., Watters, J.J, Brownlee, J. & Lupton, M. (2012). Elementary Teachers‟ Conceptions of Inquiry Teaching: Messages for Teacher Development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 159-175.
Karaduman, B. & Emrahodlu, N. (2011). A study of pre-service elementary teachers‟ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs and outcome expectations in terms of various variables. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(3)
Keys, C.W. & Kang, N.H. (2000). Secondary Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: A starting place for reform. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans.
Kucuk, M. & Cepni, S. (2015). A qualitative study to explain middle school students‟ understandings of nature of science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12 (3).
Mahmoud, N. (2009). Science Teachers‟ Beliefs and Practices: Issues, Implications and Research Agenda.International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(1), 25-48.
Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, lecture? Science, 323, 50-51.
Newby, P. (2010). Research Methods for Education. Pearson Education.
Nulty, D.D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301-314.
Okebukola, P.A.& Jegede, O.J. (1992). Survey of factors that stress science teachers and examination of coping strategies. Science Education, 76(2), 199-210.
Savasci-Acikalin, F. (2009). Teacher beliefs and practice in science education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10 (1), 1-14 .
Seung, E., Park, S. & Narayan, R. (2011). Exploring elementary Pre-service teachers‟ beliefs about science teaching and learning as revealed in their metaphor writing. Journal of Science Educational Technology, 20, 703-714.
Thorne, C. (2010). The impact of educational reforms on the work of the school principal in the United Arab Emirates. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 39(2). 172-185.
Downloads
Issue
Section
Published
Versions
- 15.09.2016 (3)
- 06.06.2024 (2)
- 15.09.2016 (1)
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.