Examining the views of preservice teachers about online science education during the Covid-19 lockdown: expectations, opportunities, threats, motivations, and beliefs

Banu  Avsar Erumit; Arzu  Tanis Ozcelik; Tugba  Yuksel; Ahmet  Tekbiyik

doi:10.36681/tused.2021.69

Authors

Banu Avsar Erumit
Arzu Tanis Ozcelik
Tugba Yuksel
Ahmet Tekbiyik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.69

Keywords:

Online science education, distance education, Covid-19 pandemic, preservice science teachers

Abstract

Switching from face-to-face learning to mandatory online education during the coronavirus pandemic brought much uncertainty and new experiences for undergraduate students who were unfamiliar with that type of learning. This research aimed to identify perceptions and experiences of preservice [PST] teachers about taking science courses online in the teacher education programs during the Covid-19 lockdown. 180 PSTs voluntarily participated in this study from three public universities located in different regions of Turkey. These PSTs enrolledin seven different science and science education courses, including Science, Technology, and Society -Science Teaching Methods, Introduction to Science, Science and Technology Teaching, Radiation and Health Physics, Science Curriculum, Application of Science in Technology. The data was collected via online questionnaires, which were applied before and after online learning and analyzed via deductive and inductive content analysis. As a result, we identified six different categories, representing their perspectives, including concerns, expectations, opportunities, threats, motivation/interests, and beliefs. In each category, PSTs’ responses were given with different codes, which were gathered under sub-categories. The results indicated that initially, PSTs had many expectations/opportunities, concerns, and beliefs toward the online education process. While some of these expectations, beliefs, and opportunities were fulfilled during the online learning process, some fundamental issues caused various obstaclesin this process as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adıgüzel, A. (2020). Salgın Sürecinde Uzaktan Eğitim ve Öğrenci Başarisini Değerlendirmeye İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri [Teachers' views on the evaluation of distance education and student success in the pandemic process]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 253-271.

al Darayseh, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on modes of teaching science in UAE schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(20), 110-115.

Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16-25.

An, Y. J., & Williams, K. (2010). Teaching with Web 2.0 technologies: Benefits, barriers and lessons learned. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 7(3), 41-48.

Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2003). Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users. International Journal Of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2), 185-210.

Avsar Erumit, B., Akerson, V. L., & Buck, G. A. (2021). Multiculturalism in higher education: experiences of international teaching assistants and their students in science and math classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(1), 251-278.

Bakioğlu, B., Çevik, M. (2020). Views of science teachers on distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 109-129. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.43502.

Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283-303. DOI 10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y

Bataineh, K. B., Atoum, M. S., Alsmadi, L. A., & Shikhali, M. (2020). A silver lining of Coronavirus: Jordanian Universities turn to distance education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 17(2), 1-11.

Bergeler, E., & Read, M. F. (2020). Comparing learning outcomes and satisfaction of an online algebrabased physics course with a face-to-face course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 115.

Bhargava, P., Antonakakis, J., Cunningham, C., & Zehnder, A. T. (2006). Web‐based virtual torsion laboratory. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 14(1), 1-8.

Blau, G., & Drennan, R. (2017). Exploring difference in business undergraduate perceptions by preferred classroom delivery mode. Online Learning, 21(3), 222–234.

Brown, S. W., Lawless, K. A., & Boyer, M. A. (2013). Promoting positive academic dispositions using a web-based PBL environment: The GlobalEd 2 project. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1389

Chadwick, R., & McLoughlin, E. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on science teaching and facilitation of practical activities in Irish Schools, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/vzufk

Chakraborty, P., Mittal, P., Gupta, M. S., Yadav, S., & Arora, A. (2020). Opinion of students on online education during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.240

CoSN. (2020). COVID-19 response: Preparing to take school Online. Retrieved August 19, 2021, from https://www.cosn.org/sites/default/files/COVID-19%20Member%20Exclusive_0.pdf.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. 3rd edition.

Croft, M.,Moore, R., Guffy, G., Hayes, S., & Gragnaniello, K., & Vitale, D. (2020). High school students’ experiences in march during the coronavirus pandemic. (Iowa City, IA: ACT, 2020). Retrieved August 19, 2021, from https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/R1841covid-insights.pdf.

Czerniewicz, L. (2020). What we learnt from “going online” during university shutdowns in South Africa. Retrieved August 19, 2021, from https://philonedtech.com/what-we-learnt-from-going-online-during-university-shutdowns-in-southafrica/ Daniel, J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49, 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3.

Darrah, M., Humbert, R., Finstein, J., Simon, M., & Hopkins, J. (2014). Are virtual labs as effective as hands-on labs for undergraduate physics? A comparative study at two major universities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 803-814.

Dinçer, S. (2015). Effects of computer-assisted learning on students' achievements in Turkey: A MetaAnalysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12(1), 99-118.

Elgart, M. A. (2021). Learning upended: How Americans experienced the shift to remote instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(5), 48-51.

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE open, 4(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Erduran, S. (2020). Science education in the era of a pandemic: How can history, philosophy and sociology of science contribute to education for understanding and solving the COVID-19 crisis? Science & Education, 29, 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00122-w.

García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande-de-Prado, M. (2021). Recommendations for mandatory online assessment in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context (pp. 85-98). Springer, Singapore.

Ghergulescu, I., Moldovan, A. N., Muntean, C. H., & Muntean, G. M. (2019). Interactive personalised stem virtual lab based on self-directed learning and self-efficacy. In Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 355-358).

Gonçalves, S. P., Sousa, M. J., & Pereira, F. S. (2020). Distance learning perceptions from higher education students—The Case of Portugal. Education Sciences, 10(12), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120374

Guangul, F. M., Suhail, A. H., Khalit, M. I., & Khidhir, B. A. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: a case study of Middle East College. Educational Assessment, Evaluation And Accountability, 32(4), 519-535.

Jansen, K. J., Corley, K. & Jansen, B. J. (2007). E-survey methodology. In R. A. Reynolds, R. Woods, & J. D. Baker (Eds.) Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 1-8). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-792-8.ch001

Kamalodeen, V. J., Figaro-Henry, S., Ramsawak-Jodha, N., & Dedovets, Z. (2017). The development of teacher ICT competence and confidence in using Web 2.0 tools in a STEM professional development initiative in Trinidad. The Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 7(1), 25-46.

Kapasia, N., Paul, P., Roy, A., Saha, J., Zaveri, A., Mallick, R., ... & Chouhan, P. (2020). Impact of lockdown on learning status of undergraduate and postgraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic in West Bengal, India. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105194

Karatepe, F., Küçükgençay, N. & Peker, B. (2020). Öğretmen adayları senkron uzaktan eğitime nasıl bakıyor? Bir anket çalışması. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 7(53), 1262-1274.

Kuo YH (2011) Language challenges faced by international graduate students in the United States. Journal of International Students, 1(2), 38-42.

Kyngäs, H., Kääriäinen, M., & Elo, S. (2020). The trustworthiness of content analysis. In H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen, & M. Kääriäinen (Eds.) The application of content analysis in nursing science research (pp. 41-48). Springer, Cham.

Kyngäs, H. (2020). Inductive content analysis. In H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen, & M. Kääriäinen (Eds.) The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research (pp. 13-21). Springer, Cham.

Lefever, S., Dal, M., & Matthiasdottir, A. (2007). Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 574-582.

Levrini, O., Fantini, P., Barelli, E., Branchetti, L., Satanassi, S., & Tasquier, G. (2021). The present shock and time re-appropriation in the pandemic era. Science & Education, 30(1), 1-31.

Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19,1-18 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875

Marek, M. W., Chew, C. S., & Wu, W. C. V. Teacher Experiences in Converting Classes to Distance Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 19(1), 40-60.

Okebukola, P. A., Suwadu, B., Oladejo, A., Nyandwi, R., Ademola, I., Okorie, H., & Awaah, F. (2020). Delivering high school Chemistry during COVID-19 lockdown: Voices from Africa. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3285-3289.

Özdoğan, A. C., & Berkant, H. G. (2020). Covid-19 Pandemi Donemindeki Uzaktan Egitime Ilişkin Paydaş Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 13-43.

Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and evaluating survey research. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 6(2), 168-171.

Raes, A., Schellens, T., & De Wever, B. (2014). Web-based collaborative inquiry to bridge gaps in secondary science education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(3), 316-347.

Rattray, J., & Jones, M. C. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of clinical nursing, 16(2), 234-243.

Ray, S., & Srivastava, S. (2020). Virtualization of science education: a lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Proteins And Proteomics, 11, 77-80.

Sarıoğlan, A. B., Altaş, R., & Şen, R. (2020). Uzaktan Eğitim Sürecinde Fen Bilimleri Dersinde Deney Yapmaya İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşlerinin Araştırılması [Investigation of teachers' views on experimenting in science course during distance education Process]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 371-394.

Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1851. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893.

Tekbiyik, A., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2010). A meta-analytical investigation of the influence of computer assisted instruction on achievement in science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 11(2), 1-22.

Tienken, C. H. (2020). The Not so subtle inequity of remote learning. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 56(4), 151153.

Ünal, M., & Bulunuz, N. (2020). Covid-19 Salgini Döneminde Yürütülen Uzaktan Eğitim

Çalışmalarının Öğretmenler Tarafından Değerlendirilmesi Ve Sonraki Sürece İlişkin Öneriler [Evaluation of distance education studies conducted during the covid-19 epidemic period by teachers and recommendations regarding the future process]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 343369.

UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response. Retrieved August 19, 2021, from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/.

Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(3). https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v5i3.2532

World Bank. (2020). Remote Learning and COVID-19 The use of educational technologies at scale across an education system as a result of massive school closings in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to enable distance education and online learning. Retrieved August 19, 2021, from file:///E:/PC/Rapid-Response-Briefing-Note-Remote-Learning-and-COVID-19-Outbreak.pdf. Yapıcıoğlu, A. E. (2020). Fen Eğitiminde Sosyobilimsel Konu Olarak Covid 19 Pandemisi Ve Örnek Uygulama Önerileri [Covid 19 pandemic as a socioscientific issue in science education and sample activity suggestions]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 1121-1141.

Zhang, Y. L. (2016). International students in transition: Voices of Chinese doctoral students in a US research university. Journal of International Students, 6(1), 175-194.