Digital age and art of teaching online design courses, a development of effective strategies for pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/Keywords:
Pandemic-era educational challenges, virtual instruction, facilitation of learning experiences, distance learning, pedagogical strategies in digital environmentsAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted traditional design education, forcing educators to adopt digital classrooms for architectural design instruction, which has led to various challenges and suboptimal student performance. This research explores effective online design teaching methods, particularly across different design modules (I-VI), using a synthesis and literature review methodology. It investigates three domains: pandemic teaching challenges, traditional design education, and suitable pandemic teaching methods. The study triangulates teaching during the pandemic, conventional techniques, and elements from content focus (CF) and support open learning (SL) methods to create a hybrid pedagogy. The proposed blended approach combines traditional design education with virtual instruction, offering guidelines for educators to structure academic activities and integrate effective online teaching strategies. The findings provide valuable insights for design instructors and educational institutions adapting to digital classrooms during the pandemic and beyond.
Downloads
References
Abe, M. (2020). Interactional practices for online collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 49, 100752. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100752
Abu Alatta, R. T., Momani, H. M., & Bataineh, A. M. (2023). The effect of online teaching on basic
design studio in the time of COVID-19: an application of the technology acceptance model.
Architectural Science Review, 66(6), 417-432.
Afify, H. M. N., Alhefnawi, M. A. M., Mohammed J. Istanbouli, Aymen H. Alsayed, & Zeineb A. Abd
ElGaffar Elmoghazy. (2021). An evaluation of physical model-making as a teaching method in
the architectural design studio – a case study at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University.
Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(1), 1123–1132. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.002.
Ahmed, W. K., & Zaneldin, E. (2013). E-Learning as a stimulation methodology to undergraduate
engineering students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 8, 18-24.
doi:10.3991/ijet.v8i1.2395
Al Maani, D., Alnusairat, S., & Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Transforming learning for architecture: online
design studio as new norm for crises adaptation under COVID-19. Open House International,
(1), 9-16. doi:10.1080/01684522.2020.1863599
Al-Marzouqi, A. H., & Ahmed, W. K. (2016). Experimenting e-learning for postgraduate courses.
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 29-37.
doi:10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5214
Alnusairat, S., Al Maani, D., & Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Architecture students' satisfaction with and
perceptions of online design studios during COVID-19 lockdown: the case of Jordan
universities. Archnet-IJAR, 15(1), 219-236. doi:10.1108/ARCH-09-2020-0195
Alqurshi, A. (2020). Investigating the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on pharmaceutical education in
Saudi Arabia – a call for a remote teaching contingency strategy. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal,
(9), 1075–1083. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2020.07.008
Amer, N. (2019). Biomimetic approach in architectural education: case study of 'biomimicry in architecture' course. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 10(3), 499–506. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2018.11.005.
Amro, D. K. (2022). The impact of COVID‐19 lockdown on design students’ performance case study in
the UAE. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 41(1), 108-124.
Avsar Erumit, B., Tanis Ozcelik, A., Yuksel, T., & Tekbiyik, A. (2021). Examining the Views of
Preservice Teachers about Online Science Education during the COVID-19 Lockdown:
Expectations, Opportunities, Threats, Motivations, and Beliefs. Journal of Turkish Science
Education, 18, 2-26.
Bhat, R., Singh, V. K., Naik, N., Kamath, C. R., Mulimani, P., & Kulkarni, N. (2020). COVID-19
outbreak: The disappointment in Indian teachers. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 102047.
doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102047
Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013, June 23–26). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. [Paper
presentation]. In Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta,
GA, USA.
Blessing, L. T. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM: a design research methodology. Springer.
Blundell, R., Costa, D. M., Joyce, R., & Xu, X. (2020). COVID-19 and inequalities. Fiscal Studies, 41, 291–
doi:10.1111/1475-5890.12240
Bol, L., & Garner, J. K. (2011). Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 104–123. doi:10.1007/s12528-011-
-7.
Browning, M. H., Larson, L. R., Sharaievska, I., Rigolon, A., McAnirlin, O., Mullenbach, L., Reigner,
N. (2021). Psychological impacts from COVID-19 among university students: Risk factors
across seven states in the United States. PLoS ONE, 16, e0245327.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245327
Brusilovsky, P., Somyurek, S., Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Zadorozhny, V., & Durlach, P. J. (2016). Open
social student modeling for personalized learning. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in
Computing, 4(3), 450–461. doi:10.1109/TETC.2015.2501243.
Bull, S. (2010). Features of an independent open learner model influencing uptake by university
students. In P. De Bra, A. Kobsa, & D. Chin (Eds.), User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (pp. 393–398). Springer.
Bull, S. (2016). Negotiated learner modelling to maintain today’s learner models. Research and Practice
in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 10. doi:10.1186/s41039-016-0035
Bull, S., Brusilovsky, P., & Guerra, J. (2018, September 3-5). Which learning visualisations to offer
students?. In Lifelong Technology-Enhanced Learning: 13th European Conference on
Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2018, Leeds, UK, Proceedings 13 (pp. 524-530).
Springer International Publishing.
Cantamessa, M. (2003). An Empirical Perspective Upon Design Research. Journal of Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–15.
Capperucci, D., Scierri, I. D. M., Salvadori, I., Batini, F., Toti, G., Barbisoni, G., & Pera, E. (2022).
Remote teaching during COVID-19 Emergency: Teaching and assessment strategies and the
role of previous training. Education Sciences, 12(10), 646.
Ceylan, S., Pınar, S., Seçmen, S., & Somer, M. E. (2021). An evaluation of online architectural design
studios during COVID-19 outbreak. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research,
(1), 203-218. doi:10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0230
Chadha, D. (2006). A curriculum model for transferable skills development. Engineering Education, 1,
–24.
Chunxia, D. (2021). Design of online volleyball remote teaching system based on AR technology.
Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60, 4299–4306. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.023
Costado Dios, M. T., & Piñero Charlo, J. C. (2021). Face-to-Face vs. e-learning models in the COVID-19
Era: Survey Research in a Spanish University. Educ. Sci., 11, 293. doi:10.3390/educsci11060293
Cross, N. (2018). Expertise in professional design. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A.
M. Williams (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 372–388).
Cambridge University Press.
Daalhuizen, J., & Cash, P. (2021). Design method content theory: towards a new understanding of
methods in design. Design Studies, 75, 101019. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2021.101018
Daalhuizen, J., Badke-Schaub, P., & Batill, S. M. (2009). Dealing with uncertainty in design practice:
issues for design-centered methodology. In The Proceedings of the International Conference on
Design Engineering, ICED’09 (pp. 147-158).
Daalhuizen, J., Person, O., & Gattol, V. (2014). A personal matter? An investigation of students' design
process experiences when using a heuristic or a systematic method. Design Studies, 35(2), 133-
Daalhuizen, J., Timmer, R., Welie, M. VD., & Gardien, P. (2019). An architecture of design doing: a
framework for capturing the ever-evolving practice of design to drive organizational learning.
International Journal of Design, 13(1), 37–52.
Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., Hein, J., Janke, S., Dickhauser, O., & Dresel, M. (2021). Shifting from face-toface to online teaching during COVID-19: the role of university faculty achievement goals for
attitudes towards this sudden change, and their relevance for burnout/engagement and
student evaluations of teaching quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106677.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106677
De-Araujo, J., & Claudiano, S. (2001). Acquisition of product development tools in industry: a theo-retical
contribution [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Technical University of Denmark.
Debacq, M., Almeida, G., Lachin, K., Lameloise, M.-L., Lee, J., Pagliaro, S., Romdhana, H., & Roux, S.
(2021). Delivering remote food engineering labs in COVID-19 time. Education for Chemical
Engineers, 34, 9-20. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.10.002
Edward, L. (2020). The Pandemic Could Open a Door to New Technology and Dramatic Innovation in
Education. Berkeley News. Retrieved from https://news.berkeley.edu/2020/05/27/thepandemic-could-open-a-door-to-new-technology-and-dramatic-innovation-in-education/
El-Ariss, B., Zaneldin, E., & Ahmed, W. (2021). Using videos in blended e-learning for a structural
steel design course. Educ. Sci., 11, 290. doi:10.3390/educsci11060290
Emam, M., Taha, D., & ElSayad, Z. (2018). Collaborative pedagogy in architectural design studio: a
case study in applying collaborative design. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 163–170.
doi:10.1016/j.aej.2018.03.005
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2020). Learning Inequality during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
SocArXiv. Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/ve4z7/
Fewella, L. N. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 on distance learning practical design courses. International
Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-24. doi:10.1007/s10798-023-09674-6
Fleischmann, K. (2022). A paradigm shift in studio pedagogy during pandemic times: An international
perspective on challenges and opportunities teaching design online. Journal of Design, Business
& Society, 8(2), 247-272. doi:10.1386/dbs_00054_1
Fojtík, R. (2018). Problems of distance education. ICTE Journal, 7(1), 14–23.
Gamage, K. A. A., Gamage, A., & Dehideniya, S. C. P. (2022). Online and hybrid teaching and
learning: enhance effective student engagement and experience. Educ. Sci., 12(10), 651.
doi:10.3390/educsci12100651
Gamage, K. A., Wijesuriya, D. I., Ekanayake, S. Y., Rennie, A. E., Lambert, C. G., & Gunawardhana, N.
(2020). Online delivery of teaching and laboratory practices: Continuity of University Programmes during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Sci., 10, 291. doi:10.3390/educsci10100291
Ghasem, N., & Ghannam, M. (2021). Challenges, benefits & drawbacks of chemical engineering online
teaching during COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, 107–114.
doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.10.002
Goldschmidt, G., & Tatsa, D. (2005). How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Design
Studies, 26(6), 593-611.
Gonz{lez-Lloret, M. (2021). Online collaboration through tasks for L2 pragmatic development. In
Working Collaboratively in Second/Foreign Language Learning (pp. 199-216). John Benjamins
Publishing Company.
Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Frances, E. M., Gardner, D. G., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W.,
Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scaleup research in prevention science: next generation. Prevention Science, 16(7).
doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x.
Grover, R., & Wright, A. (2023). Shutting the studio: the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on
architectural education in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 33(3), 1173-1197.
Guohong, G., Ning, L., Wenxian, X., & Wenlong, W. (2012). The study on the development of internetbased distance education and problems. Energy Procedia, 17, 1362–1368.
doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.294
Hassanpour, B. (2023). Transformational contribution of technology to studio culture: experience of an
online first-year architecture design studio during the COVID-19 pandemic. Archnet-IJAR:
International Journal of Architectural Research, 17(2), 393-408.
Hevner, A. R. (2007). A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 1-7.
Homan, G., & Macpherson, A. (2005). E‐learning in the corporate university. Journal of European
Industrial Training, 29(1), 75-90.
Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M., Saks, K., Leijen, A., Bardone, E., & Wang, M. (2020). Open learner models
in supporting self-regulated learning in higher education: a systematic literature review.
Computers & Education, 154, 103878.
IABFU (Imam Abdurehman bin Faisal University). (2022). Architecture Design III Course Description.
Retrieved from https://www.iau.edu.sa/en/courses/design-iii on Sep 27, 2022.
Ibrahim, A. F., Ahmed, S. A., Bataineh, A. M., & Hikmat, H. A. (2021). Evaluation of the online
teaching of architectural design and basic design courses: case study—college of architecture
at JUST, Jordan. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12, 2345–2353. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.028
Iqbal, H., Sheikh, A. K., & Samad, M. A. (2014, April 3–5). Introducing CAD/CAM and CNC machining
by using a feature based methodology in a manufacturing lab course, a conceptual framework. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Istanbul,
Türkiye. doi:10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826226
Janssen, L. (2020). How COVID-19 Exposed Challenges for Technology in Education. GSTIC Expert
Story. Retrieved from https://www.gstic.org/expert-story/how-covid-19-has-exposed-thechallenges-for-technology-in-education/
Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner
satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of
Interactive Learning Research, 11, 29–49.
Katsavounidou, G. (2022). Distance teaching urban design and planning studio courses during the
pandemic: challenges and lessons learnt. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1-13.
doi:10.1177/0739456X221084992
Klawitter, A. (2022). Challenges students face with online learning in 2022. Retrieved from
https://meratas.com/blog/5-challenges-students-face-with-remote-learning/
Kolata, S. (2020). Online pedagogy: how to teach hands-on architecture and design courses virtually.
March 15, 2020. Retrieved from https://sarakolata.medium.com/online-pedagogy-how-toteach-hands-on-architecture-and-design-courses-virtually-3e178e0d0ff5
Lambert, C. G., & Rennie, A. E. W. (2021). Experiences from COVID-19 and emergency remote
teaching for entrepreneurship education in engineering programmes. Educ. Sci., 11, 282.
doi:10.3390/educsci11060282
Larenas, D., Claudio H., Andrea Victoria Rodríguez Moran, & Karen Jocelyn Poblete Rivera. (2011).
Comparing teaching styles and personality types of EFL instructors in the public and private
Sectors. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 13(1), 111–127.
Leung, J. K., & Chu, S. K. (2020). Inspiring Makers in First-Year Engineering under Emergency Remote
Teaching. Adv. Eng. Educ., 8(4). doi:10.11120/aee.2020.08040043
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: motivations and selfregulated learning in MOOCs. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48.
doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003.
Lueth, P. L. O. (2008). The architectural design studio as a learning environment: A qualitative explo-ration of
architecture design student learning experiences in design studios from first-through fourth-year. Iowa
State University.
Lyon, P. (2016). Design education: Learning, teaching and researching through design. CRC Press.
Maulam, N., Israel, E., & Max, D. (2022). Moving to online planning during the COVID-19 pandemic:
an assessment of zoom and the impact of ict on planning boards’ discussions. Journal of
Planning Education and Research, 1-20. doi:10.1177/0739456X221105811
McAllister, K. (2010). The design process – making it relevant for students. International Journal of
Architectural Research, 4(2/3), 76–89.
Medina, M. B. E. (2015). Influencia de la interacción alumno-docente en el proceso enseñanzaaprendizaje. Paakat: Revista de Tecnología y Sociedad, 8. Retrieved from
http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/paakat/index.php/paakat/article/view/230/347
Mohammadi, H., Monadjemi, S. A., Moallem, P., & Olounabadi, A. A. (2008). E-learning system
development using an open-source customization approach. Journal of Computer Science, 4(5),
doi:10.3844/jcssp.2008.144.152
Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course 'forced' online
due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 609-611.
doi:10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205
Mostafanezhad, M. (2020). Covid-19 is an unnatural disaster: Hope in revelatory moments of crisis.
Tour. Geogr., 22, 639–645. doi:10.1080/14616688.2020.1779218
Mostafanezhad, M. (2020). Covid-19 is an unnatural disaster: Hope in revelatory moments of crisis.
Tourism Geographies, 22, 639–645. doi:10.1080/14616688.2020.1744495
Murray, A., Fox, J., Sleight, J., & Oldfield, P. (2023). The online studio: cultures, perceptions and
questions for the future. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 42(1), 108-124.
doi:10.1111/jade.12410
Mushtaha, E., Abu Dabous, S., Alsyouf, I., Oda, A., & Raafat Abdraboh, N. (2022). The challenges and
opportunities of online learning and teaching at engineering and theoretical colleges during
the pandemic. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13, 101770. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2022.101770
Muzammıl, M., Sutawıjaya, A., & Harsası, M. (2020). Investigating student satisfaction in online
learning: the role of student interaction and engagement in distance learning university.
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21, 88–96.
Naqvi, S. (2012). Methods of Teaching. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC). United
States Agency for International Development (USAID). Retrieved from
https://hec.gov.pk/english/services/universities/RevisedCurricula/Documents/2011-
/Education/MethodsTeaching_Sept13.pdf
Noviana, M., Sukardi, S., & Suryanti, N. M. N. (2020). Learning process during Covid-19 pandemic
from various variables in senior high school. SAR Journal, 3, 160–165.
Ortiz, P. A. (2020). Teaching in the time of COVID-19. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education,
(3), 201. doi:10.1002/bmb.21348
Prahani, Binar Kurnia; Suprapto, Nadi; Rachmadiarti, Fida; Sholahuddin, Arif; Mahtari, Saiyidah;
Suyidno; Siswanto, Joko. (2021). Online scientific creativity learning (OSCL) in science education to improve students' scientific creativity in COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Turkish Science
Education, 18(spec iss), 77-90..
Prince, N. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education,
, 223–231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Putri, A. H., Samsudin, A., & Suhandi, A. (2022). Exhaustive studies before covid-19 pandemic attack
of students’ conceptual change in science education: a literature review. Journal of Turkish
Science Education, 19(3), 808-829.
Raturi, S. (2010). Learners’ satisfaction of, and preference for, different instructional delivery modes: A
case study from the University of the South Pacific (USP). Suva, Central, Fiji.
Ripoll, V., Godino-Ojer, M., Calzada, J., Alqurshi, A., Debacq, M., Almeida, G., Lachin, K., Lameloise,
M.-L., Lee, J., Pagliaro, S., Romdhana, H., & Roux, S. (2021). Investigating the impact of
COVID-19 lockdown on pharmaceutical education in Saudi Arabia– a call for a remote
teaching contin-gency strategy. Educ. Chem. Eng., 34, 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.11.001
Rodríguez, C. L., Mula, J., Segovia, J. D., & Cruz-Gonz{lez, C. (2021). The effects of covid-19 on science
education: A thematic review of international research. Journal of Turkish Science Education,
(Covid-19 Special Issue), 26-45.
Rosa, C., & Ferreira, J. (2023). The distant studio: a survey of design students’ experience with distance
educational formats. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-25.
doi:10.1007/s10798-023-09673-7
Sajid, M. J. (2020). Online Teaching in the Age of COVID-19: A Case of Personal Experience. In
Materials of the International Online Distance Conference On Modern Informatics and Its
Teaching Methods.
Schön, D. A. (2015). Learning to design and designing to learn. NA, 6(1). Retrieved from
http://arkitekturforskning.net/na/article/viewFile/767/711 on May 21, 2023.
Shariatrad, F., Doostabadi, M. A., Dehbandi, R., & Senemari, F. (2022). Factors affecting online
education of architectural design studio. Soffeh, 32, 9-14. doi:10.52547/SOFEH.2021.220904.1014
Shim, T. E., & Lee, S. Y. (2020). College students’ experience of emergency remote teaching due to
COVID-19. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105578.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105578
Son, C., Hegde, S., Smith, A., Wang, X., & Sasangohar, F. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on college
students’ mental health in the United States: interview survey study. Journal of Medical Internet
Research, 22, e21279. doi:10.2196/21279
Swart, W., & MacLeod, K. (2021). Evaluating learning space designs for flipped and collaborative
learning: a transactional distance approach. Educ. Sci., 11, 292. doi:10.3390/educsci11060292
Talbot, R. (2020). How Much Research Has Been Done on Flipped Learning? 2020 Update for 2020.
Retrieved from http://rtalbert.org/how-much-research-has-been-done-on-flipped-learningupdate-for-2020/
Thomas, M. S., & Rogers, C. (2020). Education, the science of learning, and the COVID-19 crisis. Prospects, 49, 87–90. doi:10.1007/s11125-020-09495-w
Ting, D. S., Carin, L., Dzau, V., & Wong, T. Y. (2020). Digital technology and COVID-19. Nature
Medicine, 26, 459–461. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0824-5
Ulrich, K., & Eppinger, S. (2015). Product design and development. McGraw Hill Education.
UNESCO. (2022). COVID-19 Recovery: Education: from school closure to Recovery (Feb 2020- June
[Website]. Retrieved May 23, 2023, from https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/educationresponse
Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning,
technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34, 302–
doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835779.
Wong, M. H. J., Mohamed, R. N. S. B., Raja Mohd Yazit, R. N. S. B., & Ho, J. C. Y. (2023). Challenges
Faced by Students in Online Architectural Design Studio During COVID-19 Pandemic:
Univer-sities in Sarawak. In Advances in Civil Engineering Materials (pp. 81-91).
doi:10.1007/978-981-19-8024-4_7
Yaeger, P. M. (2002). Innovations and outcomes in engineering education: Active learning in dynamics classes.
The Pennsylvania State University.
Yazit, M., & Ho, J. C. Y. (2023). Challenges Faced by Students in Online Architectural Design Studio
During COVID-19 Pandemic: Universities in Sarawak. In Advances in Civil Engineering
Mate-rials (pp. 81-91). doi:10.1007/978-981-19-8024-4_7
Yesiloglu, Sevinç Nihal; Gençer, Sinem; Ekici, Funda; Isik, Burcu. Examining Pre-Service Teachers'
Views about Online Chemistry Laboratory learning experiences amid the COVID-19
pandemic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(special issue) , 108-124.
Zhang, L. (2008). Teachers’ Styles of Thinking: An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Psychology, 142(1),
–55.
Downloads
Issue
Section
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Turkish Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
