Socio-scientific Issues (SSI) research trends: A systematic literature review of publications 2011 – 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.004Keywords:
Socio-scientific Issues, science education journals, systematic literature reviewAbstract
This study aimed to investigate research trends related to socio-scientific issues (SSI). The SSI articles analysed were from highest-rating five science education journals with the highest impact ratings, published between 2011 and 2022, including Science Education [SE], Journal of Research in Science Teaching [JRST], Science and Education [S&E], International Journal of Science Education [IJSE], and Research in Science Education [RSE]. A total of 87 selected relevant SSI articles were analysed to determine research types, research topics, research sample groups, research sites, and authors with the most citations. According to the research findings, IJSE articles are the most widely published articles compared to other articles of similar journals. It is revealed that the most discussed issues in those articles of IJSE are argumentation and decision-making, followed by the nature of science. Pupils in middle and high schools constitute the largest sample groups. The continent that has been widely selected as research sites is European continent. Meanwhile, the country with the most research sites is the United States. The data collection tool most frequently used in the research is interview. S&E's Nature of Science, Scientific Inquiry, and Socio-Scientific Issues Arising from Genetics: A Pathway to Developing a Scientifically Literate Citizenry articles are the most cited articles. Challenges such as addressing efficacy, emotion, and attitude remain noticeably unexplored in SSI studies. Furthermore, exploratory studies on SSI for early childhood education.
Downloads
References
Adal, E. E., & Cakiroglu, J. (2022). Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Understanding and Decision Making on Socioscientific Issue through the Fractal Model. In Science and Education (Zenbakia 0123456789). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00319-1
Azorin, J.M., & Cameron, R. (2010). The application of mixed methods in organisational research: a literature review. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8, 95–105.
Bächtold, M., & Pallarès, G. (2022). Combining debates and reflective activities to develop students ’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. August. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21816
Balgopal, M. M., Wallace, A. M., & Dahlberg, S. (2017). Writing from different cultural contexts: How college students frame an environmental SSI through written arguments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21342
Barrue, C., & Albe, V. (2013). Citizenship Education and Socioscientific Issues: Implicit Concept of Citizenship in the Curriculum, Views of French Middle School Teachers. Science and Education, 22(5), 1089–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9571-4
Bayram-Jacobs, D. (2019). Science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1207–1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21550
Baytelman, A. (2020). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627
Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students’ Research-Informed Socio-scientific Activism: ReVisions for a Sustainable Future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9260-3
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., & Campbell, B. (2005). Systematic reviews of research in science education: rigour or rigidity? International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323719
Bossér, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students’ Positioning in the Classroom: a Study of Teacher-Student Interactions in a Socioscientific Issue Context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9627-1
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Çalik, M., & Coll, R. K. (2012). Investigating Socioscientific Issues via Scientific Habits of Mind: Development and validation of the Scientific Habits of Mind Survey. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1909–1930. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.685197
Çalık, M., & Wiyarsi, A. (2021). A systematic review of the research papers on chemistry-focused socio-scientific issues. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(3), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.360
Capkinoglu, E., Cetin, P. S., & Metin Peten, D. (2021). How do pre-service science teachers evaluate the persuasiveness of a socioscientific argument? International Journal of Science Education, 43(4), 594–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1876273
Capkinoglu, E., Yilmaz, S., & Leblebicioglu, G. (2020). Quality of argumentation by seventh-graders in local socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 827–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21609
Cebrián-Robles, D., España-Ramos, E., & Reis, P. (2021). Introducing preservice primary teachers to socioscientific activism through the analysis and discussion of videos. International Journal of Science Education, 43(15), 2457–2478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1969060
Chang, Y.-H., Chang, C.-Y., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2010). Trends of Science Education Research: An Automatic Content Analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2
Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges, and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues : A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32(October 2020), 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). The Relationship of Discipline Background to Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9394-6
Christenson, N., Gericke, N., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2017). Science and Language Teachers’ Assessment of Upper Secondary Students’ Socioscientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(8), 1403–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9746-6
Christenson, N., & Walan, S. (2022). Developing Pre-service Teachers’ Competence in Assessing Socioscientific Argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2018103
Christodoulou, A., Levinson, R., Davies, P., Grace, M., Nicholl, J., & Rietdijk, W. (2021). The use of Cartography of Controversy within socioscientific issues-based education: students’ mapping of the badger-cattle controversy in England. International Journal of Science Education, 43(15), 2479–2500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1970852
Cian, H. (2020). The influence of context: comparing high school students’ socioscientific reasoning by socioscientific topic. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1767316
Dawson, V. (2015). Western Australian High School Students’ Understandings about the Socioscientific Issue of Climate Change. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1024–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1015181
Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
Dewi, N. R., Rusilowati, A., Saptono, S., Haryani, S., Wiyanto, W., Ridlo, S., Listiaji, P., & Atunnisa, R. (2021). Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge (TPACK) Research Trends: A Systematic Literature Review of Publications Between 2010 - 2020. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.92
Eastwood, Jennifer L., Sadler, T. D., Sherwood, R. D., & Schlegel, W. M. (2013). Students’ Participation in an Interdisciplinary, Socioscientific Issues Based Undergraduate Human Biology Major and Their Understanding of Scientific Inquiry. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1051–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9298-x
Eastwood, Jennifer Lynne, Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289–2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: a journal content analysis from 1998–2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
Fang, S.-C., Hsu, Y.-S., & Lin, S.-S. (2019). Conceptualizing Socioscientific Decision Making from a Review of Research in Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9890-2
Gao, L., Mun, K., & Kim, S. W. (2019). Using Socioscientific Issues to Enhance Students’ Emotional Competence. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09873-1
Gardner, G. E., & Jones, M. G. (2011). Science Instructors’ Perceptions of the Risks of Biotechnology: Implications for Science Education. Research in Science Education, 41(5), 711–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9187-0
Garrecht, C., Reiss, M. J., & Harms, U. (2021). ‘I wouldn’t want to be the animal in use nor the patient in need’ – the role of issue familiarity in students’ socioscientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 2065–2086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1950944
Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Rao, A. (2022). Socioscientific Issues Thinking and Action in the Midst of Science-in-the-Making. Science and Education. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00306-y
Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2021). Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction on students’ contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education, 105(4), 585–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21618
Herman, B. C., Owens, D. C., Oertli, R. T., Zangori, L. A., & Newton, M. H. (2019). Exploring the Complexity of Students’ Scientific Explanations and Associated Nature of Science Views Within a Place-Based Socioscientific Issue Context. Science and Education, 28(3–5), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00034-4
Hernández-Ramos, J., Pernaa, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., & Rodríguez-Becerra, J. (2021). The Effects of Using Socio-Scientific Issues and Technology in Problem-Based Learning: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 11(10), 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100640
Hsu, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2017). Prompting students to make socioscientific decisions: embedding metacognitive guidance in an e-learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1312036
Jafari, M., & Meisert, A. (2022). Potential of Group-Based Negotiation to Promote Learner-Based Reasoning and Weighting of Arguments on Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10059-5
Jenkins, E. W. (2001). Research in Science Education in Europe: Retrospect and Prospect. In Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future (or. 17–26). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_2
Jho, H. (2015). A Literature Review of Studies on Decision-making in Socio-scientific Issues. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 35(5), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0791
Jho, H., Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2014). The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students’ Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea. Science and Education, 23(5), 1131–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9652-z
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.-I. (2021). Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022
Kamdem, J. P., Duarte, A. E., Lima, K. R. R., Rocha, J. B. T., Hassan, W., Barros, L. M., Roeder, T., & Tsopmo, A. (2019). Research trends in food chemistry: A bibliometric review of its 40 years anniversary (1976–2016). Food Chemistry, 294, 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.021
Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2017). Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9527-9
Karakaş, H. (2022). The Effect of Socioscientific Issues-Based Discussion Activities on the Attitudes of Primary School Teacher Candidates to the Life Science Teaching. 19(1), 17–36.
Karimi Takalo, S., Sayyadi Tooranloo, H., & Shahabaldini parizi, Z. (2021). Green innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 122474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122474
Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Contextualization of Nature of Science Within the Socioscientific Issues Framework: A Review of Research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.270186
Kelemen-Finan, J., Scheuch, M., & Winter, S. (2018). Contributions from citizen science to science education: an examination of a biodiversity citizen science project with schools in Central Europe. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2078–2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1520405
Khishfe, R. (2014). Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 974–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.832004
Khishfe, R. (2020). Retention of acquired argumentation skills and nature of science conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2181–2204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1814444
Khishfe, R. (2021). Explicit Instruction and Student Learning of Argumentation and Nature of Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1822652
Khishfe, R. (2022). Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in socioscientific and scientific contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 647–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2050488
Khishfe, R., Alshaya, F. S., BouJaoude, S., Mansour, N., & Alrudiyan, K. I. (2017). Students’ understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280741
Kilinç, A., Afacan, O., Polat, D., & Güler, P. D. (2014). Preservice Science Teachers ’ Belief Systems about Teaching a Socioscientific Issue. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10120a
Kim, M., Anthony, R., & Blades, D. (2014). Decision Making Through Dialogue: a Case Study of Analyzing Preservice Teachers’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 903–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9407-0
Kinskey, M., & Callahan, B. E. (2021). The Influences of Socioscientific Issues on General Science Teaching Self-Efficacy. Research in Science Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09991-9
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Newcastle : Keele University.
Kitchenham, Barbara, Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Pearl Brereton, O., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006
Klaver, L. T., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2021). Measuring Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire. Science and Education, 30(2), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00174-y
Kolovou, M. (2022). Embracing Culturally Relevant Education in Mathematics and Science: A Literature Review. The Urban Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-022-00643-4
Kolstø, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, I., Quale, A., Tonning, A. S. V., & Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students’ critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90(4), 632–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20133
Kutluca, A. Y. (2021). An investigation of elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for socioscientific argumentation: The effect of a learning and teaching experience. Science Education, 105(4), 743–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21624
Ladachart, Ladapa, & Ladachart, L. (2022). Preservice biology teachers’ decision-making on, and informal reasoning about, an agriculture-based socioscientific issue. Journal of Biological Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2058587
Ladachart, Luecha, & Ladachart, L. (2021). Preservice biology teachers’ decision-making and informal reasoning about culture-based socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 641–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1876958
Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of Science, Scientific Inquiry, and Socio-Scientific Issues Arising from Genetics: A Pathway to Developing a Scientifically Literate Citizenry. Science and Education, 23(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
Lee, H. (2020). Examining tensions in the socioscientific issues classroom: Students’ border crossings into a new culture of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21600
Lee, Hyunju, Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing Character and Values for Global Citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
Lee, Hyunju, & Yang, J. eun. (2019). Science Teachers Taking their First Steps toward Teaching Socioscientific Issues through Collaborative Action Research. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9614-6
Lee, Hyunju, Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
Lee, Hyunok, Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Examining tensions in the socioscientific issues classroom: Students’ border crossings into a new culture of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21600
Lee, M., Wu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2009). Research Trends in Science Education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999–2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802314876
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
Lin, J. W. (2020). The effects of socioscientific issues web searches on grade 6 students’ scientific epistemological beliefs: the role of information positions. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1821258
Lin, T.-C., Lin, T.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Research Trends in Science Education from 2008 to 2012: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1346–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.864428
Lin, T., Lin, T., & Tsai, C. (2012). International Journal of Science Research Trends in Science Education from 2008 to 2012 : A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. April 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.864428
Luo, K., Saleh, S., Zhang, P., & Zhu, Q. (2023). Science Education Research Trends in the Chinese Mainland From 2017 – 2021 : A Systematic Literature Review in Selected Journals. August, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X231175485
Macalalag, A. Z., Johnson, J., & Lai, M. (2019). How do we do this: learning how to teach socioscientific issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09944-9
Menke, L., Voss, S., Kruse, J., & Zacharski, K. (2022). Investigating the Knowledge Domains Science Teachers Use When Considering a Socioscientific Issue. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10067-5
Milne, C., Siry, C., & Mueller, M. (2015). Reflections on the challenges and possibilities of journal publication in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(4), 1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9719-z
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Monferrer, L., Lorenzo-Valentín, G., & Santágueda-Villanueva, M. (2022). Mathematical and Experimental Science Education from the School Garden: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Practice. Education Sciences, 12(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010047
Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2016). Intersection of argumentation and the use of multiple representations in the context of socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1100–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1183265
Nielsen, J. A. (2012). Science in discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socioscientific discussions. Science Education, 96(3), 428–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21001
Ottander, C., & Ekborg, M. (2012). Students’ Experience of Working with Socioscientific Issues - a Quantitative Study in Secondary School. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9238-1
Ottander, K., & Simon, S. (2021). Learning democratic participation? Meaning-making in discussion of socioscientific issues in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1895–1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1946200
Paul, J., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2019). Effects of a Sourcing Prompt and Conflicts in Reading Materials on Elementary Students’ Use of Source Information. Discourse Processes, 56(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1402165
Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., Dauer, J. M., & Kinslow, A. (2020). Measurement of socio-scientific reasoning (SSR) and exploration of SSR as a progression of competencies. International Journal of Science Education, 42(18), 2981–3002. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1849853
Rudsberg, K., ÖHman, J., & ÖStman, L. (2013). Analyzing Students’ Learning in Classroom Discussions about Socioscientific Issues. Science Education, 97(4), 594–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21065
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2014). Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning and Decision-making on Energy-related Issues-Development of a measurement instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2291–2313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.920550
Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A Pedagogical Model for Ethical Inquiry into Socioscientific Issues In Science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z
Schuck, P., & Feser, M. S. (2022). Science Education as a Human Right: A Systematic Review of the Literature. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11967
Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022). Augmented reality in STEM education: a systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1556–1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
Tekin, N., Aslan, O., & Yilmaz, S. (2016). Research Trends on Socioscientific Issues: A Content Analysis of Publications in Selected Science Education Journals. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i9.1572
Teo, T. W., Goh, M. T., & Yeo, L. W. (2014). Chemistry education research trends: 2004–2013. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 15(4), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00104D
Tetnowski, J. A., & Damico, J. S. (2001). A demonstration of the advantages of qualitative methodologies in stuttering research. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 26(1), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(01)00094-8
Tidemand, S. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: from the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644
Topçu, M. S., Muğaloğlu, E. Z., & Güven, D. (2014). Socioscientific issues in science education: The case of Turkey. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 14(6), 2340–2348. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.6.2226
Tsai, C., & Lydia Wen, M. (2005). Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: a content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243727
Tu, T. (2006). Preschool Science Environment: What Is Available in a Preschool Classroom? Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(4), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-0049-8
Ullah, M., Amin, S. U., Munsif, M., Safaev, U., Khan, H., Khan, S., & Ullah, H. (2022). Serious Games in Science Education. A Systematic Literature Review. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 4(3), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2022.02.001
Van der Wende, M. (2011). The Emergence of Liberal Arts and Sciences Education in Europe: A Comparative Perspective. Higher Education Policy, 24(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.3
Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2019). Science education textbook research trends: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1496–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584
Wang, H. H., Chen, H. T., Lin, H. S., Huang, Y. N., & Hong, Z. R. (2017). Longitudinal study of a cooperation-driven, socio-scientific issue intervention on promoting students’ critical thinking and self-regulation in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2002–2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1357087
Xiao, S. (2018). Rhetorical Use of Inscriptions in Students’ Written Arguments About Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9730-y
Xiao, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2017). Associations Between Attitudes Towards Science and Children’s Evaluation of Information About Socioscientific Issues. Science and Education, 26(3–4), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9888-0
Yahaya, J. M., Nurulazam, A., & Karpudewan, M. (2016). College students’ attitudes towards sexually themed science content: a socioscientific issues approach to resolution. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1174–1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1174349
Yun, A., Shi, C., & Jun, B. G. (2022). Dealing with Socio-Scientific Issues in Science Exhibition: a Literature Review. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09930-0
Zamakhsyari. (2020). Fostering ill-structured problem-solving skills of chemistry students using socioscientific issues as learning contexts. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Libk. 2215). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000533
Zeidler, D. L., & Kahn, S. (2014). It’s debatable! Using socioscientific issues to develop science literacy. NSTA Press.
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice (& S. K. A. In N. G. Lederman (arg.); II). Routledge.
Zhang, W.-X., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2021). The interplay of students’ regulation learning and their collective decision-making performance in a SSI context. International Journal of Science Education, 43(11), 1746–1778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1933250
Zheng, T. (2017). A Literature Review on Knowledge Sharing. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 05(03), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.53006
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Issue
Section
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Turkish Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
