A  Qualitative ınquiry about students’ conceptualizations of force concept in terms of ontological categories

Ömer Faruk  Özdemir

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Ömer Faruk Özdemir Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Education, Ankara-TURKEY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Alternative Conceptions, Force Concept, Teaching and Learning Physics, Ontological Categories

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to inquire about students’ conceptualizations of the force concept in terms of ontological categories. Although some of the literature have been providing supporting
evidences about the fruitfulness of ontological categories for explaining the nature of students’ alternative conceptions, some others provide strong arguments against it. To tap the controversial issues in the literature, an inquiry was conducted in a classroom context with students who were seeking a degree to become physics teachers. The data consist of four students’ written responses to physics problems, reflections about their own conceptualizations from the theoretical perspective of ontological categories, and video recordings of classroom discussions. The analysis of data showed that a theory-driven interpretation (ontological categories) about students’ conceptualizations of the force concept did not match with the students’ own interpretations about their conceptualizations. Furthermore, the students did not consider ontological category shift a fruitful instructional strategy because of the possible problems they projected for the implementation. The major problem emerged as the difficulty of situating every physics concept into the distinct ontological categories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen, X. (2007). The Object Bias and the Study of Scientific Revolutions: Lessons from Developmental Psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 4, 479–503.

Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Chi, M.T.H. (1997). Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual Structures and processes: Emergence, Discovery and Change. (pp. 209-234). Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.

Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 161-199.

Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reframing the process of conceptual change: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Chi, M. T. H., & Slotta, J. D. (1993). The ontological coherence of intuitive physics. Commentary on A. diSessa's "Toward an epistemology of physics." Cognition and Instruction, 10, 249-260.

Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.

Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal Conceptual Change in Students’ Understanding of Thermal Equilibrium: An Examination of the Process of Conceptual Restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 467–563

diSessa, A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens(Eds.), Mental models (pp. 15–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

diSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

diSessa, A. (1993a). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, (2&3), 105-225.

diSessa, A. (1993b). Ontologies in Pieces: Response to Chi and Slotta. Cognition and Instruction, 10 (2&3), 272-280.

Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490.

Ferrari, M. & Chi, M.T.H. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1231-1256.

Gupta, A., Hammer, D., & Redish, E. F. (2010). The case for dynamic models of learners' ontologies in physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19 (3), 285-321.

Hammer, D. (2004). The variability of student reasoning. Lecture 3. Manifold Cognitive Resources. In E. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI (pp. 320–340). Bologna: Italian Physical Society.

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about Atoms. Molecules, and Chemical Bonds: A Case Study of Multiple Model Use in Grade 11 Chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381.

Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158.

Ioannides, C., & Vosniadou, S. (1991, August). The development of the concept of force in Greek children. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the European Society for Research on Learning and Instruction, Turku, Finland.

Keil, F. C. (1979). Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lee, Y. & Law, N. (2001). Explorations in promoting conceptual change in electric concepts via ontological category shift. International Journal of Science Education, 23(2), 111-150.

McCloskey, M. (1983). Naïve theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299-324). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

McCloskey, M., Washburn, A. and Felch, L. (1983) Intuitive physics: the straight-down belief and its origin, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 636-649.

Minstrell, J. (1992). "Facets of students' knowledge and relevant instruction." Paper presented at the International Workshop: Research in Physics Learning - Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, University of Kiel (IPN), Kiel, Germany.

Mortimer, E. F. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science and Education, 4, 267-285.

Posner, G. J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.

Reason, P. (2003). Cooperative Inquiry. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (pp. 205–231). London: Sage.

Reiner, M., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (1988, August). Naïve materialistic belief: An underlying epistemological commitment. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 544-551). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naïve physics reasoning: A commitment to substance based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 1-34.

Rooke, J. A., Koskela, L., & Seymour, D. (2007). Producing things or production flows? Ontological assumptions in the thinking of managers and professionals in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 25, 10, 1077–1085

Slotta J., & Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Helping Students Understand Challenging Topics in Science Through Ontology Training. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 261-289.

Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H. & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing Students’ Misclassifications of Physics Concepts: An Ontological Basis for Conceptual Change. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 373-400.

Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.

Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany: SUNY Press.

Teichert, M. A., Tien, L. T., Anthony, S., & Rickey, D. (2008) International Journal of Science Education, 30, 8, 1095 – 1114

Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D.F. (2004). Conceptual change in learning genetics: An ontological perspective. Research in Science & Technology Education, 22, 185-202.

Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring Conceptual Change in Genetics Using a Multidimensional Interpretive Framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 9, 1031–1055

Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.

White, B. Y. (1993). Thinker tools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 1-100.

Wittmann, M. C. (2002). The object coordination class applied to wave pulses: Analyzing student reasoning in wave physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8): 991-1013.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage