The effects of ınquiry-based learning on students’ learner autonomy and conceptions of learning: Research Article

Eylem Yıldız-Feyzioğlu; Niymet Demirci

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Eylem Yıldız-Feyzioğlu Aydın Adnan Menderes University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7051-5232
Niymet Demirci Ministry of National Education https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2763-1879

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Conceptions of learning, inquiry-based learning, inquiry-level, learner autonomy

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of inquiry-based learning and of the regular science curriculum on students’ learner autonomy and conceptions of learning. The students in the experimental group engaged in inquiry beginning with structured, continuing with guided and ending with open, while the students in the comparison group followed the materials used in the regular science curriculum. All students participated individually in three 40-minute weekly sessions during a 14-week period. Data were gathered through individual interviews conducted with six students in total (three from the experimental group and three from the control group). Results showed that the inquiry-based learning caused students to move from participatory roles towards constructive ones, whereas the regular science curriculum did not alter participatory roles. Inquiry-based learning also enabled students’ reproductive conceptions, to change towards constructive conceptions. Students in the control group, did not change their reproductive conceptions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Eylem Yıldız-Feyzioğlu, Aydın Adnan Menderes University

Science Education Department

References

Archer-Kuhn, B., Lee, Y., Finnessey, S., & Liu, J. (2020). Inquiry-based learning as a facilitator to student engagement in undergraduate and graduate social work programs. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 8(1), 187-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.1.13

Atikoh, N., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2018). The effect of picture storybook based on scientific approach through inquiry method toward student’s inference skill. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special), 22-32. doi:10.12973/tused.10253a

Bahçivan, E., & Kapucu, S. (2014). Adaptation of conceptions of learning science questionnaire into Turkish and science teacher candidates’ conceptions of learning science. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9404

Baldock, K., & Murphrey, T. P. (2020). Secondary students’ perceptions of inquiry-based learning in the agriculture classroom. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(2), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.01235

Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2012). Motivation and transfer: The role of mastery-approach goals in preparation for future learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 399-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.651232

Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27(4), 459-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00045-7

Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300

Biggs, J. (1994). Student learning research and theory: Where do we currently stand? In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning: Using research to improve student learning (pp. 1-19). Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

Buchanan, S. M. C. (2018). The lived experience of middle school students engaged in student-driven inquiry: A phenomenological study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Queensland University of Technology.

Buck, L. B., Bretz, S. L., & Towns, M. H. (2008). Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, XXXVIII (1), 52-58.

Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937-1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347

Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2113-2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1660927

Cano, F., & Cardelle-Elawar, M. (2004). An integrated analysis of secondary school students’ conceptions and beliefs about learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173230

Chan, K. W. (2011). Preservice teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and conceptions about learning. Instructional Science, 39(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9101-1

Chang, H. P., Chen, C. C., Guo, G. J., Cheng, Y. J., Lin, C. Y., & Jen, T. H. (2011). The development of a competence scale for learning science: Inquiry and communication. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1213-1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9256-x

Cheung, D. (2007). Facilitating chemistry teachers to implement inquiry-based laboratory work. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9102-y

Chiou, G. L., Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). High school students' approaches to learning physics with relationship to epistemic views on physics and conceptions of learning physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.794134

Chiou, G. L., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning in biology: a study of their structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 167-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.558131

Chiu, M. S. (2012). Identification and assessment of Taiwanese children’s conceptions of learning mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 163-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9283-2

Choi, A., Hand, B., & Norton-Meier, L. (2014). Grade 5 students’ online argumentation about their in-class inquiry investigations. Research in Science Education, 44, 267-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9384-8

Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20053

Dart, B. C., Burnett, P. C., Purdie, N., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., & Smith, D. (2000). Students’ conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598715

Demirci, N. (2015). Fen bilimleri dersinde üst bilişsel araştırmaya dayalı öğrenmenin dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin bilimsel süreç becerilerine, akademik başarılarına ve üst bilişsel süreçlerine etkisi [The effect of metacognitive inquiry based learning on 4th grade students’ academic achievement, scientific process skills and metacognitive processes in science]. [Unpublished master's thesis dissertation]. Aydın Adnan Menderes University.

Di Mauro, M. F., & Furman, M. (2016). Impact of an inquiry unit on grade 4 students’ science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 3(14), 2239-2258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1234085

Ergül, R., Şimşekli, Y., Çalış, S., Özdilek, Z., Göçmençelebi, Ş., & Şanlı, M. (2011). The effects of inquiry-based science teaching on elementary school students’ science process skills and science attitudes. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 5(1) 48-68.

Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., Chang, H. Y., Chang, W. H., Wu, H. K., & Chen, C. M. (2016). Investigating the effects of structured and guided inquiry on students’ development of conceptual knowledge and inquiry abilities: a case study in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 1945-1971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1220688

Harris, C., & Rooks, D. (2010). Managing inquiry-based science: challenges in enacting complex science instruction in elementary and middle school classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9172-5

Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review, 79, 171-212. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1084259

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Ravit, G. D., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Jalil, P. A., Abu Sbeih, M. Z., Boujettif, M., & Barakat, R. (2009). Autonomy in science education: a practical approach in attitude shifting towards science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(6), 476-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9164-4

Janssen, F. J., Westbroek, H. B., & van Driel, J. H. (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers. Instructional Science, 42(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9296-z

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Ku, K. Y., Ho, I. T., Hau, K. T., & Lai, E. C. (2014). Integrating direct and inquiry-based instruction in the teaching of critical thinking: an intervention study. Instructional Science, 42(2), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9279-0

Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of Inquiry-based learning effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 20(10), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366

Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students' conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20245

Lee, S. J. (2009). Exploring students’ beliefs about teaching and learning in relation to their perceptions of student-centered learning environments: A case study of the studio experience [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Georgia.

Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. (2012). How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning? Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.499166

Levy, P., Aiyegbayo, O. & Little, S. (2009). Designing for inquiry-based learning with the Learning Activity Management System. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00309.x

Lin, C.-L., Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2012). An investigation of two profiles within conceptions of learning science: An examination of confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 499-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0092-3

Lin, Y. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Effects of different forms of physiology instruction on the development of students' conceptions of and approaches to science learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 36(1), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00118.2011

Litmanen, T., Lonka, K., Inkinen, M., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Capturing teacher students’ emotional experiences in context: does inquiry-based learning make a difference? Instructional Science, 40(6), 1083-1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9203-4

Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., and Järvelä, S. (2013). Patterns in elementary school students’ strategic actions in varying learning situations. Instructional Science, 41, 933-954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9262-1

Marshall, D., Summer, M., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Students’ conceptions of learning in an engineering context. Higher Education, 38(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003866607873

Marshall, J. C., Smart, J. B., & Alston, D. M. (2017). Inquiry-based instruction: a possible solution to improving student learning of both science concepts and scientific practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 777-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9718-x

Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 277-300.

Maxwell, D. O., Lambeth, D. T., & Cox, J. T. (2015). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on science achievement for fifth-grade students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 1-31.

Ministry of National Education of Turkish Republic (2013). İlköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Primary education institutions (primary and secondary schools) science courses (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 grades) curriculum]. Ankara, Turkey.

Mulyeni, T., Jamaris, M., & Supriyati, Y. (2019). Improving basic science process skills through inquiry-based approach in learning science for early elementary students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 187-201. doi: 10.12973/tused.10274a

Mupira, P., & Ramnarain, U. (2018). The effect of inquiry-based learning on the achievement goal-orientation of grade 10 physical sciences learners at township schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 810-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21440

Nasution, W. N. (2018). The effects of inquiry-based learning approach and emotional intelligence on students’ science achievement levels. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(4), 104-115. doi: 10.12973/tused.10249a

National Research Council. (2011). National science education standards. National Research Council.

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., ... & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Ramnarain, U. D. (2020). Exploring the autonomy of South African school science students when doing investigative inquiries for a science fair. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9128

Romadhona, R. R., & Suyanto, S. (2020). Enhancing integrated science process skills: Is it better to use open inquiry or guided inquiry model?. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(2), 307-319. dx.doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n2.307-319

Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2012). Which type of inquiry project do high school biology students prefer: Open or guided?. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 831-848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9222-9

Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective 1. Some commonsense conceptions. Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg.

Shen, K. M., Lee, M. H., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Undergraduate students’ earth science learning: relationships among conceptions, approaches, and learning self-efficacy in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1527-1547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1198060

Silva, T., & Galembeck, E. (2017). Developing and supporting students' autonomy to plan, perform, and interpret inquiry-based Biochemistry experiments. Journal of Chemistry Education, 94(1), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00326

Tan, E. (2018). Effects of two differently sequenced classroom scripts on common ground in collaborative inquiry learning. Instructional Science, 46(6), 893-919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9460-6

Tao, D., & Zhang, J. (2018). Forming shared inquiry structures to support knowledge building in a grade 5 community. Instructional Science, 46(4), 563-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9462-4

Thoron, A. C., & Myers, B. E. (2011). Effects of Inquiry-based Agriscience Instruction on Student Achievement. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(4), 175-187. Doi: 10.5032/jae.2011.04175

Tsai, C. C., & Kuo, P. C. (2008). Cram school students’ conceptions of learning and learning science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 353-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701191425

Tsai, C.-C. (1998). An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientations of Taiwanese eighth graders. Science Education, 82(4), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<473::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-8

Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733-1750. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000230776

Tsai, C.-C., Jessie Ho, H. N., Liang, J.-C., & Lin, H.-M. (2011). Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students. Learning and Instruction, 21, 757-769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.002

Tuan, H. L, Chin, C. C., Tsai, C. C. & Cheng, S. F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 541-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9078-7

Valenčič-Zuljan, M. (2007). Students’ conceptions of knowledge, the role of the teacher and learner as important factors in a didactic school reform. Educational Studies, 1, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690600948166

Wang, J. R., Wang, Y. C., Tai, H. J., & Chen, W. J. (2010). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry-based instruction on students with different prior knowledge and reading abilities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 801-820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9186-7

Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Berkshire, England.

Wong, S. Y., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Uncovering Malaysian secondary school students’ academic hardiness in science, conceptions of learning science, and science learning self-efficacy: A structural equation modeling analysis. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09908-7

Wu, H. K., & Hsieh, C. E. (2006). Developing sixth graders’ inquiry skills to construct explanations in inquiry‐based learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1289-1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621035

Zhang, L. (2016). Is inquiry-based science teaching worth the effort? Science & Education, 25, 897-915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9856-0

Zhang, W. X., Hsu, Y. S., Wang, C. Y., & Ho, Y. T. (2015). Exploring the impacts of cognitive and metacognitive prompting on students’ scientific inquiry practices within an e-learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 529-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.996796

Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23, 383-399. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1001631.pdf