A mixed-method study on pre-service teachers' ınformal reasoning regarding nuclear energy use: Research Article

Halil İbrahim Sağlam; Barış Eroğlu

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Halil İbrahim Sağlam Aksaray University
Barış Eroğlu aksaray university

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Informal reasoning mode, decision making, preservice teachers, nuclear energy use

Abstract

The aim of this study was to reveal pre-service teachers’ informal reasoning regarding nuclear energy use in terms of informal reasoning modes, decision modes, and argument types. The exploratory sequential mixed method was used to collect data. The informal reasoning of pre-service teachers was investigated thoroughly and holistically by examining the qualitative data first, and then by making qualitative findings quantitative. The findings revealed that pre-service teachers adopted social and ecological-oriented informal reasoning more. As far as argument modes are concerned, the number of supportive arguments was higher compared to rebuttal arguments. The study further revealed that most of the pre-service teachers had a high level of informal reasoning. Our study showed that pre-service science teachers used multiple informal reasoning modes and demonstrated high-quality informal reasoning. Integrating socio-scientific issues in the curriculum may help pre-service teachers improve the quality of their informal reasoning and produce more arguments. Teachers can relate a subject in their lessons to a socio-scientific issue, which can help enhance students' use of arguments and the quality of informal reasoning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acar, Ö. (2008). Argumentation skills and conceptual knowledge of undergraduate students in physics by inquiry class [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ohio State University.

Akşit, A. C. (2011). The views of primary education pre-service teachers' on socio-scientific issues and their perspectives on the teaching of these issues [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ege University.

Ateş, H. (2013). Views of pre-service science teachers about nuclear energy [Unpublished master's thesis]. Erciyes University.

Ateş, H., & Saraçoğlu, M. (2013). Pre-service science teachers' perspective about nuclear energy, Kırşehir Journal of Faculty of Education, 14(3), 175-193.

Çavuş, R. (2013). Epistemological beliefs with different of 8th grade students' perspectives on socio-scientific issues [Unpublished master's thesis]. Sakarya University.

Creswell, J. W. (2014a). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2014b). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2th ed.). Sage.

Demiral, Ü., & Çepni, S. (2018). Examining argumentation skills of preservice science teachers in terms of their critical thinking and content knowledge levels: an example using gmos. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(3), 128-151.

Demircioğlu, T., & Uçar, S. (2014). Investigation of written arguments about Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant. Elementary Education Online, 13(4), 1373-1386.

Dolan, T. J., Nichols, B. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Using socio-scientific issues in primary classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(3), 1–12.

Driver, L., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.

Evans, J. St. B. T. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 978–996.

Grace, M., Lee, Y. C., & Asshoff, R. (2015). Student decision-making about a globally familiar socioscientific issue: the value of sharing and comparing views with international counterparts. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1855-1874.

Kaya, İ. S. (2012). Environment and human in the nuclear energy world. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Social Sciences, 1(24), 71-90.

Kılınç, A., Afacan, O., Polat, D., Demirci Güler, P., Yıldıtım, K., Demiral, Ü., Eroglu, B., Kartal, T., Sonmez, A., Iseri, B., & Gorgulu, O. (2014). Preservice science teachers’ belief system about teaching a socioscientific issue. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(3), 79-102.

Kılınç, A., Boyes, E., & Stanissstreet, M. (2013). Exploring students' ideas about risks and benefits of nuclear power using risk perception theories. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 252-266.

Kortland, K. (1996). An STS scenario study about students' decision making on the waste issue. Science Education, 80, 673–689.

Kutluca, A., Y. (2012). Investigating of pre-service science teachers' socio-scientific argumentation quality in terms of content knowledge level *Unpublished master's thesis+. Abant İzzet Baysal University.

Küçük, H., Güven, G., & Aycan, H. Ş., (2015). Developing a holistic measurement on nuclear issues for preservice science teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12(1), 85-98.

Liu, S., Lin, C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010) College students' scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socio-scientific decision making, Science Education, 95(3), 497-517.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (Second Edition). SAGE.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage.

Öztürk, S., & Leblebicioğlu, G. (2015). Investigation of reasoning modes in making a decision about hydroelectric power plants which is a socio-scientific issue. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 1-33.

Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 745–754.

Sadler, T. D. (2003). Informal reasoning regarding SSI: The influence of morality and content knowledge [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of South Florida.

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 41, 513–536.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005a). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding SSI: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89, 71–93.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005b). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 112–138.

Shaw, V. F. (1996). The cognitive processes in informal reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 51–80.

Soysal, Y. (2012). Influence of content knowledge level to socio-scientific argumentation quality: Genetically modified organisms *Unpublished master's thesis+. Abant İzzet Baysal University.

Turkish Electricity Transmission Corporation (TEİAŞ), (2011). Nükleer Enerji Nedir.

http://www.teias.gov.tr/ebulten/makaleler/2011/NUKLEER%20ENERJI%NEDİR/NUKLEER%2 0ENERJI%20NEDIR.htm.

Topçu, M. S. (2008). Pre-service science teachers' informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues and the factors influencing their informal reasoning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.

Topçu, M. S. (2015). Socio-scientific issues and teaching. Pegem Publishing.

Topçu, M. S., Muğaloğlu, E. Z. V & Güven, D. (2014). Socio-scientific issues in science education: the case of Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(6), 2340-2348.

Topçu, M. S., Sadler, T.D., & Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2010). Preservice science teachers' informal reasoning about socio scientific issues: The influence of issue context. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2475-2495.

Topçu, M. S., Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Turkish pre-service science teachers' informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues and the factors influencing their informal reasoning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 313-332.

Turan, B. (2012). Determining and comparing of primary pre-service teachers' scientific habits of mind via socio-scientific issues [Unpublished master's thesis]. Karadeniz Technical University.

Tweney, R. D. (1991). Informal reasoning in science. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 3–16). Erlbaum.

Wimmer, R., D., & Dominick, J., R., (2011). Mass media research: An introduction. Wadsworth.

Witzig, S.B., Halverson, K. L., Siegel, M. A., & Freyermuth, S. K. (2011). The interface of opinion, understanding and evaluation while learning about a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2483-2507.

Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). High school students' informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1163–1187.

Yapıcıoğlu, A. E., & Aycan, Ş. (2018). Pre-service science teachers' decisions and types of informal reasoning about the socioscientific issue of nuclear power plants. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.137.2

Yıldırım, M., & Örnek, İ. (2007). Ultimate choice for energy: The nuclear energy. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 32-44.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative methods in social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35–62.