Perception and reality: Two dimensions of scientific literacy measures: Research Article

Faik Özgür Karataş; Fatih  Orçan; Suat  Çelik; Şule Merve  Uludüz; Burçin  Turan Bektaş; Sevil  Akaygün

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Faik Özgür Karataş Trabzon University
Fatih Orçan
Suat Çelik
Şule Merve Uludüz
Burçin Turan Bektaş
Sevil Akaygün

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Science Literacy, Dunning-Kruger Effect, Turkish Society, Perception

Abstract

In the 21st century, individuals are expected to be scientifically literate and develop themselves in this direction. However, wrong judgments about self-competence, such as overconfidence, can cause mistakes in the process of solving problems related to science and technology and prevent making the right decisions. This situation, known as the Dunning-Kruger effect, is defined as a person's overconfidence in their abilities, knowledge, and skills. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between individuals' perceptions and observed levels of scientific literacy. Survey method was employed to conduct the study. The science literacy scale (SLS) developed by researchers was administered to 5426 adults aged between 18 and 65. The participants were asked to make predictions about the scores they could get from SLS before and after it was administrated. A significant and positive relationship between the pre- and post-scores that the participants predicted to receive from the scale and the scores they got from the scale was found. The difference between the individuals' observed science literacy levels and their predicted scores generally decreases by educational degree. The individuals’ awareness of their real situation increased after seeing the questions in SLS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aikenhead, G.S., Orpwood, G., & Fensham, P. (2011). Scientific literacy for a knowledge society. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, D.A. Roberts, P-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (28-44). New York: Routledge.

Anson, I. G. (2018). Partisanship, political knowledge, and the dunning‐kruger effect. Political Psychology, 39(5), 1173-1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12490

Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Reflections, 4(2), 4-15.

Barber, B. M. & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Jjournal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400

Bingle, W. H., & Gaskell, P. J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decisionmaking and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 78(2), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780206

Breeze, M. (2018). Imposter syndrome as a public feeling. In Feeling Academic in the Neoliberal University (pp. 191-219). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64224-6_9 Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices (ED461491). ERIC.

Cengiz, C. ve Karataş, F. Ö. (2016). Reflective thinking and teaching. Journal of National Education, 45(211), 5-27.

Chapman, A. (2017). Using the assessment process to overcome Imposter Syndrome in mature students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(2), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1062851

Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B. and Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods: Design and analysis (trans. A. Alpay) Anı.

Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691-1730.

Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2009). How chronic self-views influence (and mislead) self-assessments of task performance: Self-views shape bottom-up experiences with the task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017452

Dani, D. (2009). Scientific literacy and purposes for teaching science: a case study of Lebanese private school teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 289-299.

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6%3C582::AID-TEA5%3E3.0.CO;2-L

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of mixed methods research, 6(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Dunning, D., Heath, C. and Suls, J. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69-106. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1529-1006.2004.00018.x

Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J. and Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01235

Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D. and Kruger, J. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 105(1), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002 Ekiz, D. (2009). Scientific Research Methods. (2nd Edition). Anı.

Fu, T., Koutstaal, W., Fu, C. H. Y., Poon, L. and Cleare, A. J. (2005). Depression, confidence, and decision: Evidence against depressive realism. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27(4), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-2404-x

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them?. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

Haun, D. E., Zeringue, A., Leach, A. and Foley, A. (2000). Assessing the competence of specimenprocessing personnel. Laboratory Medicine, 31, 633–637. https://doi.org/10.1309/8Y66-NCN2J8NH-U66R

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.

Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90

Jakobsson, N., Levin, M. & Kotsadam, A. (2013). Gender and overconfidence: effects of context, gendered stereotypes, and peer group. Advances in Applied Sociology, 3(02), 137-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2013.32018

Karataş, F. O., Turan Bektaş, B., Yılmaz, P., Cengiz, C., Orçan, F., Akaygün, S. & Çelik, S. (2018, April 18-22). Redefining Scientific Literacy In The 21St Century: Comparison Of Expert Opinions. 27th International Conference on Educational Sciences, April 18-22, 2018, Antalya-Turkey.

Kesik, C. (2016). Developing and applying an inventory to determine the science literacy of primary school third grade students (Sanlıurfa province example) *Unpublished master’s thesis+ Niğde University.

Knights, D., & Clarke, C. A. (2014). It’s a bitter sweet symphony, this life: Fragile academic selves and insecure identities at work. Organization Studies, 35(3), 335-357. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0170840613508396

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(6), 1121.

Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1%3C71::AID-SCE6%3E3.0.CO;2-C

Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996). Construction of a paper and-pencil test of basic scientific literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of science. Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 331–359.

Losh, S. C. (2006). Generational and educational effects on basic US adult civic science literacy. The Korean Science Foundation and the Korean Academy of Science and Technology, 836-845.

Meier-Pesti, K., & Penz, E. (2008). Sex or gender? Expanding the sex-based view by introducing masculinity and femininity as predictors of financial risk taking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 180-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.002

Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 29-48.

Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631-644. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000005

Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502517. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502

Mynttinsen, S., Sundstrom, A., Vissers, J., Koivukoski, M., Hakuli, K., Keskinen, E. (2009) Self-assessed driver competence among novice drivers: A comparison of driving test candidate assessments and examiner assessments in a Dutch and Finnish sample. Journal of Safety Research, 40, 301-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2009.04.006

Naganuma, S. (2017). An assessment of civic scientific literacy in Japan: Development of a more authentic assessment task and scoring rubric. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(4), 301-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1323131

Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2(2), 175-220. https://doi.org/10.1037%2F1089-2680.2.2.175

Özgelen, S. (2010). Examination of pre-service science teachers' views on the nature of science in an inquirybased laboratory course [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004

Park, Y.-J., & Santos-Pinto, L. (2010). Overconfidence in tournaments: Evidence from the field. Theory and Decision, 69, 143–166.

Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2017). Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1774-1784. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7

Phillips, M. L., Drevets, W. C., Rauch, S. L., & Lane, R. (2003). Neurobiology of emotion perception I: The neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biological psychiatry, 54 (5), 504514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00168-9

Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166

Sarkar, M., & Corrigan, D. (2014). Bangladeshi science teachers’ perspectives of scientific literacy and teaching practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1117-1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9450-8

Schlösser, T., Dunning, D., Johnson, K. L., & Kruger, J. (2013). How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counter explanation for the Dunning Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.004

Snowden, D. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive selfawareness. Journal of knowledge management, 6 (2), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210424639

Somyürek, S., ve Çelik, İ. (2017). Dunning-Kruger syndrome and subjective evaluations. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 8(1), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.327830.

Soobard, R. (2015). A study of gymnasium students’ scientific literacy development based on determinants of cognitive learning outcomes and self-perception [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Tartu.

Stankov, L., & Crawford, J. D. (1996). Confidence judgments in studies of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(6), 971-986.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00130-4 Tabak, I. (2015). Functional Scientific Literacy. Handbook of educational psychology, 269.

Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Toward a contingency theory of decision making. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(3), 212-228.

Turgut, H. (2007). Scientific literacy for all. Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences, 40(2), 233-256.

Turğut, E. (2015). Examining the relationship of the Dunning-Kruger effect with secondary school students' academic logical reasoning skills, moral maturity level and life positions *Unpublished master’s thesis]. Yuzuncu Yıl University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Van.

Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3

Williams, E., Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2013). The hobgoblin of consistency: Algorithmic judgment strategies underlie inflated self-assessments of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 976–994. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0032416

Wu, K. C., Shein, P. P., Tsai, C. Y., Chou, C. Y., Wu, Y. Y., Liu, C. J., Chiu, H. L., Hung, J. F., Chao,D., & Huang, T. C. (2012). An investigation of Taiwan's public attitudes toward science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 1-21.

Yasa, H. D. (2018). Evaluation of the relationship between teacher candidates' lifelong learning tendencies and information literacy skills *Unpublished master’s thesis+. Bartın University.