Critical thinking, real life problems and feedback in the sciences classroom

Carolina  Carvalho; Edite  Fiuza; Joseph  Conboy; Jesuína  Fonseca; João SANTOS Santos; Ana Paula  Gama; Maria Helena  Salema

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Carolina Carvalho Education Institute of the University of Lisbon, Lisboa-Portugal
Edite Fiuza University Lusófona of Humanities and Technologie, Lisboa-Portugal
Joseph Conboy Education Institute of the University of Lisbon, Lisboa-Portugal
Jesuína Fonseca Education Institute of the University of Lisbon, Lisboa-Portugal
João SANTOS Santos Education Institute of the University of Lisbon, Lisboa-Portugal
Ana Paula Gama Instituto Superior Dom Afonso III, Loulé-Portugal
Maria Helena Salema Education Institute of the University of Lisbon, Lisboa-Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Feedback, Teacher Education, Critical Thinking, Real Life Problems

Abstract

This descriptive and interpretative study was aimed at better understanding how to foment effective feedback in the sciences classroom by implementing an activity based in a real-life problem that was intended to promote critical thinking. Eleven secondary and pre-secondary public school teachers participated in a workshop in the Greater Lisbon area (part of a year-long continuing education project). In one three-hour session, they performed an activity intended to promote critical thinking, based on a real-life problem, and received feedback from a workshop facilitator. Participants responded to two questionnaires concerning the nature of the activity performed and the feedback perceived. Interpretative analysis of responses indicates that the activity performed was perceived as a real-life problem and the feedback was perceived as effective. The outcomes and conclusions contribute to a possible understanding of how such an activity can facilitate effective feedback in the sciences classroom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akçay, B. (2009). Problem-based learning in science education. Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 26-36.

Bardin, L. (2004). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Bóo, M. (1999). Enquiring children, challenging teaching – Investigating science processes. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Black,P., Harrison, H., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Assessment for learning. Putting it into practice. London: Open University Press.

Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, V USA: ASCD.

Caillot, M. (2006, March). From a text-book problem statement to stating a problem by students in physics education. Communication presented at the University of Lisbon Conference, Lisbon.

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. New York: Prometheus Books.

Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and habilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills theory and practice, (pp. 9-26). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Fiuza, E. (2010). Papel do contexto de Aprendizagem na resolução de problemas em ciência [Role of the Learning Context in Science Problem Solving]. (Doctoral dissertation). Institute of Education, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2012). Know thy impact. Feedback for Learning, 70(1), 18-23.

Hewitt, P. G. (2002). Conceptual physics. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem solving in real-life contexts: An alternative for design in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(3), 203-220.

Klassem, S. (2006). Contextual assessment in science education: Background, issues, and policy. Science Education, 90(5), 820-851.

Kyle, W. C. Jr., Penick, J. E. & Shymansky, J. A. (1979). Assessing and analyzing the performance of students in college science laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16(6), 545-551.

Lee, H. & Bae, S. (2008). Issues in implementing a structured problem-based learning strategy in a volcano unit: A case study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(4), 655-676.

Leighton, J. P., Rogers, W. T., & Maguire, T. O. (1999). Assessment of student problemsolving on ill-defined tasks. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 45(4), 409-427.

Leou, M., Abder, P., Riordan, M., & Zoller, U. (2006). Using ‘HOCS-centered learning’ as a pathway to promote science teachers’ metacognitive development. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 69-84.

Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In B. J. Fraser, & K. J. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, (pp. 249-262). London/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same classes: Students’ experiences in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591-613.

McIntosh, T. C. (1995). Problem-solving processes: An alternative approach to the classic scientific method. The Science Teacher, 62(4), 16-19.

Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1999). Social constraints in laboratory and classroom tasks. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Development in social context, (pp. 172-193). New York: Harvard University Press.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

OCDE. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in reading, mathematics and science, (Volume 1). Retrieved from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/pisa-2009-

results-what-students-know-and-can-do_9789264091450-en#page1. Doi:10.1787/9789264091450.

Pine, J., Aschbacher P., Roth E., Jones M., McPhee C., Martin, C., Phelps, S., Kyle, T., & Foley, B. (2006). Fifth graders’ science inquiry abilities: A comparative study of students in hands-on and textbook curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 467-484.

Pizzini E. L., Abell, S. K., & Shepardson, D. S. (1988). Rethinking thinking in science classroom. The Science Teacher, 55, 22-25.

Roth, W. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 127-152.

Swartz, R. J., Fischer, S. D., & Parks, S. (1998). Infusing the teaching of critical and creative thinking into secondary science – A lesson design handbook. Pacific Grove: Critical Thinking Books & Software.

Valente, M.O., Conboy, J., & Carvalho, C. (2009). Student voices on how engagement is influenced by teacher’s communication of evaluation results. Communication presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Vienna.

Weber, J. R. (2014). A Problem-based learning helps bridge the gap between the classroom and the real world. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/instructionaldesign/ problem-based-learning-helps-bridge-gap-classroom-real-world/

Wiggins, G. (2012). Seven keys to effective feedback. Feedback for Learning, 70(1), 10-16.

Wlodkowski, R.J. (2008). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Wood, C. (2006). The Development of creative problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 96-113.