The turkish physics teachers’ views of the ‘radiation’ subject in the current textbook

Authors

  • Sibel Karaca Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum-TURKEY
  • Önder Şimşek Atatürk University, Education Faculty, Departmant of Physics Education, Erzurum-TURKEY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Radiation, textbooks, Turkish physics teachers

Abstract

Radiation has become an important issue due to an increase in human-made radiation sources and a rapid improvement in technology. The aim of this study is to elicit the Turkish physics teachers’ views of the ‘radiation’ subject in the current textbooks. To collect data, semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve teachers working in different high schools. The data were presented using tables with quatotions. The findings showed that the teachers were mostly familiar with the ‘radiation’ subject in the textbooks. They stated that the curriculum insufficiently involved the ‘radiation’ subject. Further, they addressed that the textbooks minimally referred to the subject since the university entrance examination does not cover the radiation-related questions. Teachers also depicted that they had limited subject matter knowledge of radiation and found it difficult for teaching their students. Moreover, they thought that integrating more radiation subjects into the current textbooks would be beneficial for them and their students. The current study suggests that the scope of the ‘radiation’ subject in the textbooks should be extended. Furthermore, a new physics curriculum ought to be interactively developed by the help of the teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, C.N.C, Shaharim, S.A.and Abdullah M.F.N.L. (2017). Teacher-student interactions, learning commitment, learning environment and their relationship with student learning comfort. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 57-72.

Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi, Turkey.

Aydın, A. (2004). Çeşitli ülkelerin orta öğretim kimya derslerinin müfredatlarının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi ve türkiye için yeni bir kimya müfredat önerisi. Doctora Theses. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara, Turkey.

Balta, N.(2018)High School Teachers’ Understandingof Blackbody Radiation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 23-43.

Colclough, N.D., Lock, R., and Soares, A. (2010). Pre-service teachers' subject knowledge of and attitudes about radioactivity and ionising radiation. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 423-446.

Cooper, S., Yeo, S., and Zadnik, M., (2003). Australian students’ views on nuclear issues: Does teaching alter prior beliefs. Physics Education, 38(2), 123-129.

Eijkelhof, H., Kortland, K., and Loo, F. V. (1984). Nuclear Weapons - A Suitable Topic for the Classroom? Physics Education, 19, 11-15.

Eijkelhof, H. (1996). Radiation risk and science education. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68,273-278.

Erden, M. (1998). Eğitimde program değerlendirme. 3. Baskı. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık, Turkey.

Fukutoku, Y.(2010). Fact-finding survey on teachers’ radiation literacyand radiation education in elementary and middle schools in Kagoshima Prefecture. Japanese Society of Radiation Safety Management, 9, 58–68.

Hafele A. (2011). Exploring students thinking of atoms and radiation with the atom builder simülator. Paper present at the Proceedings The National Conference, Newyork, USA.

Henriksen, E. K., Jorde, D. (2001). High school students’ understanding of radiation and the environment: Can museums play a role? Science Education, 85(2), 189-206.

Ince, E., Sesen, B. A., and Kirbaslar, F. G.(2012). Investigation of undergraduate students’ understanding of radiation and radioactivity. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B-Social and Educational Studies, 4, 993-1004.

Libarkin,J. C., Asghar, A., Crockett, C., and Sadler, P. (2011). Invisible misconceptions: student understanding of ultraviolet and infrared radiation. Astronomy Education Review,10, 1.

Lucas, A. M. (1987). Public knowledge of radiation. Biologist, 34 (3), 125–129.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. USA: Sage Publications.

Millar, R., & Gill, J. S. (1996). School students’ understanding of processes, involving radioactive substances and ionizing radiation. Physics Education, 31(1), 27-33.

Millar, R., Klaassen,K., and Eijkelhof,H. (1990). Teaching about radioactivity and ionising radiation: an alternative approach. Physics Education, 25, 338-342.

Molu, Z., Kahyaoğlu, H., and Köksal, E., A. (2016). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Radyoaktiflikle İlgili Bilgi Düzeyleri. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society, 1(1), 165-190.

Mork, S. M. (2011). An interactive learning environment designed to increase the possibilities for learning and communicating about radioactivity. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(2), 163-177.

Morgul, I., Yılmaz, A., & Uludağ, N. (2004). Lise 2 kimya ders kitabında yeralan radyoaktivite konusunun incelenmesi, öğrencilerin bu konudaki bilgilerinin araştırılması ve öneriler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 206-215.

Nakiboğlu, C., and Tekin, B.B. (2006). Identifying students’ misconceptions about nuclearchemistry: A study of Turkish high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 83,1712-1718.

Nishina, K. (1999). The importance of early-school radioactivity education in cultivating proper reflexive judgement on radiation. Paper present at Nippon Genshiryoku Kenkyujo JAERI, Conf 361-365,

Neumann, S; and Hopf, M. (2012). Students' conceptions about `Radiation': Results from an explorative interview study of 9th grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 826-834.

Öner, D.( 2010). Öğretmenin bilgisi özel bir bilgi midir? Öğretmek için gereken bilgiye kuramsal bir bakış. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 27(2) ,23-32.

Özer, B., ve Gelen İ. (2008).Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterliklerine sahip olma düzeyleri hakkında öğretmen adayları ve öğretmenlerin görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5, 9.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Third Edition).California: Sage Publications.

Pilakouta, M. (2011). TEI Piraeus students' knowledge on the beneficial applications of nuclear physics. Paper present at International Scientific Conference, The Conference for the contribution of Information Technology To Science, Economy, Society and Education, Piraeus, Greece.

Prather,E,. (2005). Students' beliefs about the role of atoms in radioactive decay and half-life. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 345-354.

Rego and Peralta (2006). Portuguese students' knowledge of radiation physics. Physics Education, 41(3), 259.

Robson, C. (2001). Real world research. USA: Blackwell Publishers.

Tada, J. (1999). Understanding radiation and risk: The importance of primar and secondary education. Japan Nippon Genshiryoku Kenkyujo JAERI, Conf 399 - 403.

Taşaoğlu, A.K. ve Bakaç, M. (2011). Probleme dayalı öğrenme: radyoaktivite örneği e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 6(1), 1233-1241.

Taşaoğlu, A.K.,Ateş Ö., and Bakaç, M.(2015). Prospective physics teachers’ awareness of radiation and radioactivity. European Journal of Physics Education,6 ( 1), 1-14.

Tortop, H.S., Mavi, B., Akkurt, I., Mavi, M., Özek, S. (2009). Investigation of knowledge level of high school students on radiation concept. Balkan Physics Letters, 16, 1-6.

Tsubokura, M., Kitamura,. and Yoshida, M.(2018) Post-Fukushima radiation education for Japanesehigh school students in affected areas and itspositive effects on their radiation literacy. Journal of Radiation Research, 59(2), 65-74.

Usta, N. D. (2011). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme kuramı çerçevesinde bilgisayar destekli öğretim mataryeli geliştirilmesi, uygulanması ve etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi: çekirdek kimyası (radyoaktivte) örneği. Doctora Theses, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon, Turkey.

Yalçın, A., ve Kılıç, Z. (2005).Öğrencilerin yanlış kavramaları ve ders kitaplarının yanlış kavramalara etkisi örnek konu: radyoaktivite. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(3) 125141.

Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. Baskı).Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, Turkey.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

Published

15.09.2019

How to Cite

Karaca, S. ., & Şimşek, Önder . (2019). The turkish physics teachers’ views of the ‘radiation’ subject in the current textbook. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(3), 290-298. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 364

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.