Overcoming stereotypes in teacher training: Responses from a systematic review to address the gender gap in STEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2025.026Keywords:
Science and technology education, pre-service teachers, gender perspective, teacher identityAbstract
The unequal presence of women in scientific and technological fields compared to men may have its origins partly in the compulsory educational stages and performance of teachers involved therein. This study aims to systematically review the existing literature on science and technology teacher training to address the gender gap in STEM studies, identifying aspects with didactic implications. Following the PRISMA systematic methodology, 37 references published between 2008 and 2022 were selected. The studies were carried out in 14 countries following different qualitative and quantitative research methodologies, together with the design and implementation of training proposals. The result of the content analysis of the studies is expressed in five emerging categories: attitudes towards science and technology and their teaching, perceptions and beliefs regarding the student profile, educational methodologies in pre-service teacher training, and the emotions and invisibility of female role models. In view of the results, up to now not enough attention has been paid to teacher training in aspects to address the teaching of scientific-technological disciplines from a gender perspective. It is proposed to train teachers through reflection to detect the persistence of gender inequality, break down stereotypes and incorporate female role models into scientific-technological education, as well as consider the effect of emotions in the learning of these disciplines. The ultimate aim is to incorporate a gender perspective into the teaching identity of future science and technology educators and, so that it is reflected in their teaching and contributes to reducing the gender gap in STEM professions.Downloads
References
Acevedo-Díaz, J.A., & García-Carmona, A. (2016). Algo antiguo, algo nuevo, algo prestado. Tendencias sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia en la educación científica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 13(1), 3-19. http://hdl.handle.net/10498/18010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2016.v13.i1.02
*Acisli, S., Metin, M., & Kolomuc, A. (2012). The Investigate Attitude of Primary Pre-Service Teachers Regarding Science and Technology Laboratory. 4th World Conference on Educational Sciences (WCES-2012), 46, 2168-2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.447
*Akçöltekin, A. (2016). Investigation of the effects of trainings on the development of high school teachers’ attitudes about scientific researches and project competitions. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 1349-1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.4.0334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.4.0334
Akhtar, M., Khalil, A., Noshaba, A., & Khalil, S. (2024). Effect of think-pair-share and choral response assessment methods on academic achievement of prospective science teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(3), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.029
Amirtham S, N., & Kumar, A. (2023). The underrepresentation of women in STEM disciplines in India: a secondary analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 45(12), 1008-1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2179901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2179901
*Arabit García, J., Prendes Espinosa, M.P. & Serrano Sánchez, J.L. (2021). STEM education in Primary Education from a gender perspective. Revista Fuentes, 23(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.v23.i1.12266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.v23.i1.12266
Archer, L., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Eduction, 94(4), 617-639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
Avolio, B., Pardo, E., & Prados-Peña, M.B. (2024). Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women academics worldwide: A literature review. Social Psychology of Education, 27, 261-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09838-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09838-3
*Ayuso, A., Merayo, N., Ruiz, I., & Fernández, P. (2022). Challenges of STEM Vocations in Secondary Education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(4), 713-724. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2022.3172993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2022.3172993
*Awofala, A.O.A., Olabiyi, O.S., Awofala, A.A., Arigbabu, A.A., Fatade, A.O., & Udeani, U.N. (2019). Attitudes toward Computer, Computer Anxiety and Gender as determinants of Pre-service Science, Technology, and Mathematics Teachers’ Computer Self-efficacy. Digital Education Review 36, 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2019.36.51-67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2019.36.51-67
*Bejarajo Franco, M.T., & García Fernández, B. (2016). La wiki como recurso didáctico-tecnológico en la formación docente femenina. Un estudio de caso en la Facultad de Educación de Ciudad Real (UCLM). Revista Artemis 22(1), 101-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.15668/1807-8214/artemis.v22n1p101-111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15668/1807-8214/artemis.v22n1p101-111
Bellová, R., Balážová, M., & Tomčík, P. (2021). Are attitudes towards science and technology related to critical areas in science education? Research in Science & Technological Education 41(10), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1991298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1991298
Benavent, X., de Ves, E., Forte, A., Botella-Mascarell, C., López-Iñesta, E., Rueda, S., Roger, S., Perez, J., Portalés, C., Dura, E., Garcia-Costa, D., & Marzal, P. (2020). Girls4STEM: Gender Diversity in STEM for a Sustainable Future. Sustainability, 12(15), 6051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156051
*Berber, N.C., & Oral, I. (2012). The investigation of physics pre-service teachers' social learning styles in terms of various variables. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4, 1689-1702.
Bertrand, M., Dolly, C., & Sendhil, M. (2005). Implicit Discrimination. American Economic Review, 95(2), 94-98. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/000282805774670365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670365
Bisquerra, R., & Pérez N. (2007). “Las competencias emocionales.” Educación XXI, 10, 61-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.1.10.297
*Bravo-Lucas, E., Mero, M. B., Hernández-Barco, M. A., & Jiménez, V. M. (2022). Las emociones en ciencias en la formación inicial del profesorado de infantil y primaria. Revista Interuniversitaria De Formación Del Profesorado. Continuación De La Antigua Revista De Escuelas Normales, 97(36.1). https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v97i36.1.92426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v97i36.1.92426
Cadaret, M. C., Hartung, P. J., Subich, L. M., & Weigold, I. K. (2017). Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.002
*Çam, A., & Geban, O. (2017). Effectiveness of case-based learning instruction on pre-service teachers’ chemistry motivation and attitudes toward chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1248927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1248927
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. 2009. Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014412
Cheryan, S., & Plaut, V.C. (2010). Explaining Underrepresentation: A Theory of Precluded Interest. Sex Roles 63, 475-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
Del Olmo-Muñoz, J., González-Calero, J.A., Pascual, D., Arnau, D., & Arevalillo-Herráez, M. (2022). Using intra-task flexibility on an intelligent tutoring system to promote arithmetic problem-solving proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology (BERA), 53(6), 1976-1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13228
*Díaz-Noguera, M.D. (2019). Gender attitudes of pre-service teachers to innovation in STE(A)M. INTED2019 Proceedings, 9926-9930. https://dx.doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.2484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.2484
*Díez-Bedmar, M.d.C. (2022). Feminism, Intersectionality, and Gender Category: Essential Contributions for Historical Thinking Development. Frontiers in Education, 7, 842580. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.842580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.842580
*Doğru, M., & Çelik, M. (2019). Analysis of Pre-service Science and Classroom Teachers' Attitudes and Opinions Concerning Renewable Energy Sources in Terms of Various Variables. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research-IJRER, 9(4), 1761-1771. https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v9i4.10101.g7779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v9i4.10101.g7779
Esteves, M. (2018). Gender equality in education: A challenge for policy makers. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 893-905. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.893905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.893905
*Fernandes, I.M.B., & Cardim, S. (2018). Perception of future Portuguese teachers about female underrepresentation in scientific-technological areas and careers. Educação e Pesquisa, 44, e183907. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201844183907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634201844183907
*García-Morís R., & Alfonso-Cendón, J. (2022). Social Perceptions of Science and Technology Among Students of Early Childhood and Primary Education. In: Gude Prego, J.J., de la Puerta, J.G., García Bringas, P., Quintián, H., Corchado, E. (eds) 14th International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems and 12th International Conference on European Transnational Educational (CISIS 2021 and ICEUTE 2021). CISIS - ICEUTE 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 356-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87872-6_35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87872-6_35
Garritz, A. (2010). La enseñanza de la ciencia en una sociedad con incertidumbre y cambios acelerados. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 28(3), 315-326. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ec/v28n3.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ec/v28n3.4
Gheith, E., & Aljaberi, N. M. (2019). The Image of Scientists among Pre-Service Classroom and Child Education Teachers in Jordan. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 561-578. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12436a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12436a
Giles, I., Cook, N., Hazari, Z., Fernandez, M., & Kramer, L. (2023). Examining the Effects of STEM Identity and Teaching Identity on Science and Mathematics Teaching Identity and Persistence in a Teaching Program. Journal of College Science Teaching, 52(5), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434898.2023.12290243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19434898.2023.12290243
Gómez, J., Tayebi, A., & Delgado, C. (2022). Factors That Influence Career Choice in Engineering Students in Spain: A Gender Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3093655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3093655
*Goreth, S., & Vollmer, C. (2022). Gender does not make the difference: interest in STEM by gender is fully mediated by technical socialization and degree program. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33, 1675-1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09772-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09772-z
*Gullberg, A., Andersson, K., Danielsson, A., Scantlebury, K., & Hussenius, A. (2018). Pre-Service Teachers’ Views of the Child-Reproducing or Challenging Gender Stereotypes in Science in Preschool. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 691-715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9593-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9593-z
Hasenhütl, S., Luttenberger, S., Macher, D., Eichen, L., Eglmaier, M., & Paechter, M. (2024). Empowering educators: A training for pre-service and in-service teachers on gender-sensitive STEM instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 20(6), em2452. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14590
*Hernández-Barco, M.A., Sánchez-Martín, J., Corbacho-Cuello, I., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2021). Emotional Performance of a Low-Cost Eco-Friendly Project Based Learning Methodology for Science Education: An Approach in Prospective Teachers. Sustainability, 13, 3385. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063385
Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2012). To choose or not to choose science: constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 186-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749362
Holmlund, T., Lesseig, K. & Slavit, D. (2018). Making sense of STEM education in K-12 contexts. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(32), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0127-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0127-2
Hoyer, H. (2024). The persistent underrepresentation of women in academic leadership. Engineering Education Review, 2(1), 14-15. https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2023.0494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2023.0494
*Juriševič, M., Glažar, S.A., Pučko, C.R., & Devetak, I. (2008). Intrinsic Motivation of Pre‐service Primary School Teachers for Learning Chemistry in Relation to their Academic Achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601148517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601148517
*Kahraman, S., Yilmaz, Z.A., Bayrak, R., & Gunes, K. (2014). Investigation of Pre-service Science Teachers' Self-efficacy Beliefs of Science Teaching. Global Conference on Linguistics and Foreign Language Teaching (LINELT). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 501-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.364
Kerkhoven, A.H., Russo, P., Land-Zandstra, A.M., Saxena, A., & Rodenburg, F.J. (2016). Gender stereotypes in science education resources: a visual content analysis. PLoS One, 11(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165037
Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285
*Kollmayer, M., Schultes, M.T., Lüftenegger, M., Finsterwald, M. Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2020). REFLECT – A Teacher Training Program to Promote Gender Equality in Schools. Frontiers in. Education, 5, 136. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00136
*Krause, M., Pietzner, V., Dori, Y. J., & Eilks, I. (2017). Differences and Developments in Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Prospective Chemistry Teachers Concerning the Use of ICT in Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4405-4417. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00935a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00935a
*Kuvac, M., & Koc, I. (2014). Preservice Science Teachers’ Critical Thinking Dispositions: İstanbul University Sample. Turkish Journal of Education (TURJE), 3(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.19128/turje.39804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.39804
*Kuvac, M., & Koc, I. (2022). Enhancing preservice science teachers’ perceptions of engineer and engineering through STEM education: a focus on drawings as evidence. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(4), 1539-1559. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2052038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2052038
*Lay, Y.F., & Khoo, C.H. (2012). Relationships between actual and preferred Science learning environment at tertiary level and attitudes towards science among pre-service science teachers. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 20(4), 1117-1142.
Lleixa Arribas, M. T., Soler Prat, S., & Serra Payeras, P. (2020). Perspectiva de género en la formación de maestras y maestros de Educación Física. (Gender perspective in the training of Physical Education teachers). Retos, 37, 634-642. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.74253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.74253
*López-Banet, L., Aguilera, D., Jiménez-Liso, M.R., & Perales-Palacios, F.J. (2021). Emotional and Cognitive Preservice Science Teachers' Engagement While Living a Model-Based Inquiry Science Technology Engineering Mathematics Sequence About Acid-Base. Frontiers in. Psychology, 12, 719648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719648
*Madhawa Nair, S., Rashid Mohamed, A., & Marimuthu, N. (2013). Malaysian teacher trainees' practices on science and the relevance of science education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371311288967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371311288967
Martín-Gámez, C, Fernández-Oliveras, A., García-Pardo, F., Torres-Blanco, V., & García-Durán D. (2021). Aplicación de un instrumento de análisis de libros de texto de ciencia y tecnología desde una perspectiva de género. En F. Cañada y P. Reis (coord./ed.), Aportaciones de la educación científica para un mundo sostenible, Actas electrónicas del XI Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en la Didáctica de las Ciencias, 2021 (1-2324). Revista Enseñanza de las Ciencias.
Martín-Gámez C, García-Durán, D., Fernández-Oliveras, A., & Torres-Blanco, V. (2022). Factors to consider from education to promote an image of science and technology with a gender perspective. Heliyon, 8(10), e11169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11169
*Mazas, B., & Bravo, B. (2018). Attitudes towards science in preschool and primary school preservice teachers. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 22(2), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i2.7726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i2.7726
*Merayo, N., & Ayuso, A. (2022). Analysis of barriers, supports and gender gap in the choice of STEM studies in secondary education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33, 1471-1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09776-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09776-9
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Journal Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966
Miralles-Cardona, C., Kitta, I., & Cardona‐Moltó, M. (2023). Exploring Pre-Service STEM Teachers’ Capacity to Teach Using a Gender-Responsive Approach. Sustainability, 15(14), 11127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411127
Moher D, Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman D.G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Owuondo, J. (2023). Breaking Barriers: Understanding and Overcoming Societal, Institutional, and Cultural Health Challenges for Women in STEM Fields. International journal of latest technology in engineering, management & applied science (IJLTEMAS), 12(10), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2023.121004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2023.121004
*Özerkeskin, M., Kadir, A.O., Armağan, Ö.F., & Samanci, N.K. (2012). Pre-service teachers' attitudes towards some environmental problems. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4, 97-104.
*Ozsoy, S. (2012). A survey of Turkish pre-service science teachers’ attitudes toward the environment. Egitim Arastirmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 121-140.
Page, H. (2024). Women and Girls in STEM Fields: A Reference Handbook. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216183129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216183129
Page, M.J., , McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., et al. (2021). Declaración PRISMA2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010
Park, S., & Oliver, J.S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
Patall, E. A., Steingut, R. R., Freeman, J. L., Pituch, K. A., & Vasquez, A. C. (2018). Gender disparities in students’ motivational experiences in high school science classrooms. Science Education, 102(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21461
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Pey-Tee, E.O., & Subramaniam, R. (2023). Gender differences in attitudes towards science: comparison of middle school students in England, Singapore and USA using complete TIMSS 2011 data. Research in Science & Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2177267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2177267
Ramírez-Segado, A., Rodríguez-Serrano, M. & Benarroch, A. (2021). El agua en la literaturaeducativa de las dos últimas décadas. Una revisión sistemática. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 18(1), 1107. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i1.1107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i1.1107
Rarieya, J., Wango, N., Oluga, M., & Abunga, O. (2024). Accelerating Primary Education Tutors’ Acquisition of Gender-Responsive Pedagogies. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(4), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.4.849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.4.849
*Reiman, M. (2019). Childhood, science, and technology: a gender analysis from the family, educational and cultural environment point of view. 13th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2019), 6203-6212. https://dx.doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1512
Reinoso Tapia, R., Galindo, S., Delgado-Iglesias, J., & Bobo-Pinilla, J. (2024). Flipped learning in a molecular biology course: pre-service teachers’ performance and perceptions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(2), 232-253. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.013
*Repenning, A., Lamprou, A., Petralito, S., & Basawapatna, A. (2019). Making Computer Science Education Mandatory: Exploring a Demographic Shift in Switzerland. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319758
*Rivadulla, J. C., Rodríguez, M., & González, O. (2021). Actitudes hacia las Ciencias de la Naturaleza de los maestros en formación y en ejercicio de Educación Primaria. Revista Complutense de Educación, 32(4), 581-591. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.70856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.70856
Rossi, A., & Barajas, M. (2015). Elección de estudios CTIM1 y desequilibrios de género. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 33(3), 59-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1481
Sáinz, M. (2017). ¿Por qué no hay más mujeres STEM? Se buscan ingenieras, físicas y tecnólogas. Ariel, S. A.
Sáinz, M. (2020). Brechas y sesgos de género en la elección de estudios STEM: ¿Por qué ocurren y cómo actuar para eliminarlas? Colección Actualidad (Centro de Estudios Andaluces), 84, 1-22. https://www.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/publicaciones/descargar/1049/documento/2368/Actualidad84.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.54790/actualidad.0013
Sánchez-Martín, J., Cañada-Cañada, F., & Dávila-Acedo, M. A. (2018). Emotional Responses to Innovative Science Teaching Methods: Acquiring Emotional Data in a General Science Teacher Education Class. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 346-359. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.408
Shah, Z. A., Mahmood, N., & Harrison, C. (2013). Attitude towards science learning: An exploration of pakistani students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(2), 35-47.
Studdard, S. (2002). Adult women students in the academy: Impostors or members? The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 50(3), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377366.2002.10401202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07377366.2002.10401202
*Steele, A., Brew, C., Rees, C., & Ibrahim-Khan, S. (2013). Our Practice, Their Readiness: Teacher Educators Collaborate to Explore and Improve Preservice Teacher Readiness for Science and Math Instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9311-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9311-2
Tan, D., & Maeda, Y. (2021). Perceptions of science teachers’ growth-mindset practices and U.S. high school students’ initial science identity and its development. International Journal of Science Education, 43(13), 2206-2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1958021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1958021
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B.J. (1990). What does it mean to be an exemplary science teacher? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(1), 3-25. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/tea.3660270103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270103
United Nations Mujeres. (2023). Power on: How we can supercharge an equitable digital future. United Nations publication issued by UNWOMEN. En https://www.unwomen.org. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/explainer/2023/02/power-on-how-we-can-supercharge-an-equitable-digital-future
Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M. A. (2004). Imagen de la ciencia y la tecnología al final de la educación obligatoria. Cultura y Educación, 16(4), 385-398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1174/1135640042802473
Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M. A. (2008). El declive de las actitudes hacia la ciencia de los estudiantes: un indicador inquietante para la educación científica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 5(3), 274-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2008.v5.i3.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2008.v5.i3.03
Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M. A. (2009). La relevancia de la educación científica: actitudes y valores de los estudiantes relacionados con la ciencia y la tecnología. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 27(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3661
Vázquez-Cupeiro, S. (2015). Ciencia, estereotipos y género: una revisión de los marcos explicativos. Convergencia, 22(68), 177-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v0i68.2957
*Wahyudiati, D., Sutrisno, H., & Supiah, Y. L. I. (2019). Investigation of Attitudes Toward Chemistry and Learning Experiences of Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 9(2), 191-211. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2019/v9/i2/1384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2019/v9/i2/1384
*Wahyudiati, D., Rohaeti, E., Irwanto, Wiyarsi, A., & Sumardi, L. (2020). Attitudes toward Chemistry, Self-Efficacy, and Learning Experiences of Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers: Grade Level and Gender Differences. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 235-254. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13116a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13116a
Wang, MT., & Degol, J.L. (2017). Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
*Xu, M., Williams, P. J., Gu, J., Liu, M., & Hong, J. C. (2021). Technology teachers’ professional attitudes towards technology: An investigation of Chinese high school general technology teachers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09686-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09686-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Turkish Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC-ND includes the following elements: Credit must be given to the creator; only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted; no derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted.
