The Effect of Project-based Learning Model and Online Learning Setting to Analytical Skills of Discovery Learning, Interactive Demonstrations, and Inquiry Lessons on the Pre-Service Elementary Teachers
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.140Keywords:
Project-based learning, discovery learning, interactive demonstrations, inquiry lessons, preservice elementary teacherAbstract
This study aims to investigate the effect of the Project-based Learning (PjBL) learning model and class differences based on online learning settings (synchronous, asynchronous, and mixed) on the analytical abilities of the Discovery Learning (DL), Interactive Demonstration (ID), and Inquiry Lessons (IL) models after adjusting for IQ of pre-service elementary teachers (PETs). The sample was randomly selected as 36 PETs who took science teaching courses in elementary schools. Data collection techniques using tests with indicators of analytical ability at the level of inquiry model stage include DL, ID, and IL. Data analysis was carried out quantitatively using two-way multivariate analysis of covariance with one covariate. The results showed that the PjBL model and the online learning setting each affected students' analytical skills in DL, ID, and IL, but after the learning model interacted with differences in online learning settings the results did not affect the analytical test results on the DL, ID, and IL models. This finding indicates that in an online learning design, the selection of project-based learning models can be effective if the right online learning setting is used, namely a combination of synchronous and asynchronous.
Downloads
References
Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student's thinking skills?. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100
Ankhi, P., Andery, L. I. M., Salleh, S. M., & Shahrill, M. (2019). Enhanced learning through analogy in the teaching of cardiovascular system. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 176-186.
Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). the effect of three levels of inquiry on the improvement of science concept understanding of elementary school teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 235-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11216a
Asniza, I. N., Zuraidah, M. O. S., Baharuddin, A. R. M., Zuhair, Z. M., & Nooraida, Y. (2021). Online game-based learning using Kahoot! to enhance pre-university students' active learning: A students' perception in biology classroom. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 145-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.57
Atmojo, I. R. W., Sajidan, S., Sunarno, W., & Ashadi, A. (2017). Profil kemampuan menganalisis model pembelajaran level of inquiry untuk membelajarkan materi ipa berbasis hots pada calon guru sekolah dasar [Profile of the ability to analyze the level of inquiry learning model to teach hotsbased science material to prospective elementary school teachers]. In Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains) (pp. 162-166).
Bahasoan, A. N., Ayuandiani, W., Mukhram, M., & Rahmat, A. (2020). Effectiveness of online learning in pandemic COVID-19. International journal of science, technology & management, 1(2), 100-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v1i2.30
Baran, M., Baran, M., Karakoyun, F., & Maskan, A. (2021). The influence of project-based STEM (PjbLSTEM) applications on the development of 21st century skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 798-815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.104
Chen, J. C. (2020). Developing a cycle-mode POED model and using scientific inquiry for a practice activity to improve students’ learning motivation, learning performance, and hands-on ability. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1716023
Chiu, C. F. (2020). Facilitating k-12 teachers in creating apps by visual programming and project-based learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(1), 103-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i01.11013
Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and youth services review, 118, 105440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440
Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., & Sulistiyo, U. (2019). Inquiry-based learning in Indonesia: Portraying supports, situational beliefs, and chemistry teachers’ adoptions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4), 538-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.6
Erickson, S., Neilson, C., O’Halloran, R., Bruce, C., & McLaughlin, E. (2021). ‘I was quite surprised it worked so well’: Student and facilitator perspectives of synchronous online problem based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(3), 316-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1752281
Ezra, O., Cohen, A., Bronshtein, A., Gabbay, H., & Baruth, O. (2021). Equity factors during the COVID19 pandemic: Difficulties in emergency remote teaching (ert) through online learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7657-7681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10632-x
Fajardo, M. T. M., Bacarrissas, P. G., & Castro, H. G. (2019). The effects of interactive science notebook on student teachers' achievement, study habits, test anxiety, and attitudes towards physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 62-76.
García-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzm{n, M. (2017). Primary pre-service teachers’ skills in planning a guided scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 989-1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9536-8
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2018). General linear models: MANOVA and MANCOVA. In IBM SPSS DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765-24
Statistics 25 Step by Step. Routledge
Gezim, B. A. R. A., & Xhomara, N. (2020). The effect of student-centered teaching and problem-based learning on academic achievement in science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 180-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.20
Hadi, W., & Saragi, D. (2020). Development of visual media characteristic of batak culture ‚Dalihan Na Tolu‛ for students in 6th grade elementary school. Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 2(3), 757-764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v2i3.336
Harahap, M. B., & Bukit, N. (2020). Integrated science learning development of model inquiry training based on comics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1428, No. 1, p. 012045). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1428/1/012045
Heleri, H., Situmorang, R. P., & Dewi, L. (2019). The development of free inquiry lab-based students’ worksheet to increase the dimension in science literacy process. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(2), 188-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.17573
Hermanto, H. (2020). Teachers’ attitude towards online learning during Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Development Studies, 1(1), 1-7.
Hidayati, S. N., Sunyono, S., & Sabdaningtyas, L. (2021). Inquiry-based E-LKPD in effort to improve the fourth grade students’ learning outcome. International Journal of Educational Studies in Social Sciences (IJESSS), 1(3), 129-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53402/ijesss.v1i3.28
Huberty, C. J., & Petoskey, M. D. (2000). Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance. In Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50008-2
Khan, R. A., Atta, K., Sajjad, M., & Jawaid, M. (2021). Twelve tips to enhance student engagement in synchronous online teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1912310
Joyce, B., Weil, N., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Pearson Educational.
Koszalka, T. A., Pavlov, Y., & Wu, Y. (2021). The informed use of pre-work activities in collaborative asynchronous online discussions: The exploration of idea exchange, content focus, and deep learning. Computers & Education, 161, 104067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104067
Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students' sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169-179.
Mulyeni, T., Jamaris, M., & Supriyati, Y. (2019). Improving basic science process skills through inquiry-based approach in learning science for early elementary students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 187-201.
Murtza, M. H., Gill, S. A., Aslam, H. D., & Noor, A. (2020). Intelligence quotient, job satisfaction, and job performance: The moderating role of personality type. Journal of Public Affairs, e2318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2318
Nafingah, S., Rokhimawan, M. A., Mustadi, A., & Wangid, M. N. (2020). Levels of inquiry-interactive demonstration: Its effect on students' critical thinking ability in online learning with the topic of waves and sounds. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 255-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/1.06212
Neumann, K. L., Alvarado-Albertorio, F., & Ramírez-Salgado, A. (2020). Online approaches for implementing a digital escape room with preservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 415-424.
Novak, E., & Wisdom, S. (2018). Effects of 3D printing project-based learning on preservice elementary teachers’ science attitudes, science content knowledge, and anxiety about teaching science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 412-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5
Novia, N., & Riandi, R. (2017). The analysis of students scientific reasoning ability in solving the modified Lawson Classroom Test of scientific reasoning (MLCTSR) problems by applying the levels of inquiry. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 116-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9600
Park, S., Stone, S. I., & Holloway, S. D. (2017). School-based parental involvement as a predictor of achievement and school learning environment: An elementary school-level analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 195-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.09.012
Perdana, R., Budiyono, Sajidan, Sukarmin, & Atmojo, I. R. W. (2019, March). A conceptual of teaching models inquiry-based social constructivism (IbSC). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 243, No. 1, p. 012110). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012110
Putra, A. K., Sumarni, Deffinika, I., & Islam, M. N. (2021). The effect of blended project-based learning with stem approach to spatial thinking ability and geographic skill. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 685-704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14340a
Racheva, V. (2018, December). Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning environments. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2048, No. 1, p. 020032). AIP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082050
Saldo, I. J. P., & Walag, A. M. P. (2020). Utilizing Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Developing Students’ Communication and Collaboration Skills in Physics. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 232-237.
Samsudin, M. A., Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2020). The effect of STEM project based learning on self-efficacy among high-school physics students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 94-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.15
Schellinger, J., Mendenhall, A., Alemanne, N. D., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., Douglas, I., ... & Marty, P. F. (2017). ‚Doing Science‛ in elementary school: using digital technology to foster the development of elementary students’ understandings of scientific inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4635-4649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00955a
Setyarini, T., Mustaji, M., & Jannah, M. (2020). The effect of project-based learning assisted pangtus on creative thinking ability in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(11), 245-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.12717
Shatri, Z. G. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of using information technology in learning process of students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 420-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.36
Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2020). A study on the application of artificial intelligence in elementary science education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 39(1), 117-132.
Shukri, A., Nordin, L., Salleh, F. I. M., Raidzwan, S. N. M., & Ahmad, R. (2020). UniKL students’ perception on synchronous learning using ICT as learning tools to learn English. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 793-796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.08.170
Subekti, A. S. (2021). Covid-19-triggered online learning implementation: Pre-service English teachers’ beliefs. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 4(3), 232-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v4i3.2591
Sudigdo, A., & Setiawan, B. (2020). Level of inquiry in senior high school Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 12, 2838-845.
Suryandari, K. C., Sajidan, S., Rahardjo, S. B., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Fatimah, S. (2018). Project-based science learning and pre-service teachers’science literacy skill and creative thinking. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.17229
The George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2005). Instructional module project based learning. Edutopia Modules.
Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
Vorholzer, A., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2019). Guidance in inquiry-based instruction–an attempt to disentangle a manifold construct. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1562-1577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1616124
Wenning, C. J. (2005). Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(3), 3-11.
Wenning, C. J. (2010). Levels of inquiry: Using inquiry spectrum learning sequences to teach science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5(4), 11-19.
Wenning, C. J. (2011). The levels of inquiry model of science teaching. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), 9-16.
Wu, T. T., & Wu, Y. T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631
Yanto, B. E., Subali, B., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Improving Students' Scientific Reasoning Skills through the Three Levels of Inquiry. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 689-704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12444a
Yulianti, E., Al Husna, I. Y., & Susilowati, S. (2018). The Role of Inquiry-Based Interactive Demonstration Learning Model on VIII Grade Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skill. Journal of Science Education Research, 2(1), 35-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v2i1.19333
Zydney, J. M., Warner, Z., & Angelone, L. (2020). Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments. Computers & Education, 143, 103678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103678
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Turkish Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC-ND includes the following elements: Credit must be given to the creator; only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted; no derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted.
