Digital age and art of teaching online design courses, a development of effective strategies for pandemic

Afaq Chohan; Jihad Awad; Bouzid Boudiaf; Adi Irfan Che Ani

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Afaq Chohan Ajman University UAE
Jihad Awad Ajman University
Bouzid Boudiaf Ajman University
Adi Irfan Che Ani University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Pandemic-era educational challenges, virtual instruction, facilitation of learning experiences, pedagogical strategies in digital environments, Distance Learning

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted traditional design education, forcing educators to adopt digital classrooms for architectural design instruction, which has led to various challenges and suboptimal student performance. This research explores effective online design teaching methods, particularly across different design modules (I-VI), using a synthesis and literature review methodology. It investigates three domains: pandemic teaching challenges, traditional design education, and suitable pandemic teaching methods. The study triangulates teaching during the pandemic, conventional techniques, and elements from content focus (CF) and support open learning (SL) methods to create a hybrid pedagogy. The proposed blended approach combines traditional design education with virtual instruction, offering guidelines for educators to structure academic activities and integrate effective online teaching strategies. The findings provide valuable insights for design instructors and educational institutions adapting to digital classrooms during the pandemic and beyond.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abe, M. (2020). Interactional practices for online collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100752. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100752

Abu Alatta, R. T., Momani, H. M., & Bataineh, A. M. (2023). The effect of online teaching on basic design studio in the time of COVID-19: an application of the technology acceptance model. Architectural Science Review, 66(6), 417-432.

Afify, H. M. N., Alhefnawi, M. A. M., Mohammed J. Istanbouli, Aymen H. Alsayed, & Zeineb A. Abd ElGaffar Elmoghazy. (2021). An evaluation of physical model-making as a teaching method in the architectural design studio – a case study at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(1), 1123–1132. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.002.

Ahmed, W. K., & Zaneldin, E. (2013). E-Learning as a stimulation methodology to undergraduate engineering students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 8, 18-24. doi:10.3991/ijet.v8i1.2395

Al Maani, D., Alnusairat, S., & Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Transforming learning for architecture: online design studio as new norm for crises adaptation under COVID-19. Open House International, 46(1), 9-16. doi:10.1080/01684522.2020.1863599

Al-Marzouqi, A. H., & Ahmed, W. K. (2016). Experimenting e-learning for postgraduate courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 29-37. doi:10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5214

Alnusairat, S., Al Maani, D., & Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Architecture students' satisfaction with and perceptions of online design studios during COVID-19 lockdown: the case of Jordan universities. Archnet-IJAR, 15(1), 219-236. doi:10.1108/ARCH-09-2020-0195

Alqurshi, A. (2020). Investigating the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on pharmaceutical education in Saudi Arabia – a call for a remote teaching contingency strategy. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 28(9), 1075–1083. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2020.07.008

Amer, N. (2019). Biomimetic approach in architectural education: case study of 'biomimicry in ar-chitecture' course. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 10(3), 499–506. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2018.11.005.

Amro, D. K. (2022). The impact of COVID‐19 lockdown on design students’ performance case study in the UAE. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 41(1), 108-124.

Avsar Erumit, B., Tanis Ozcelik, A., Yuksel, T., & Tekbiyik, A. (2021). Examining the Views of Preservice Teachers about Online Science Education during the COVID-19 Lockdown: Expectations, Opportunities, Threats, Motivations, and Beliefs. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18, 2-26.

Bhat, R., Singh, V. K., Naik, N., Kamath, C. R., Mulimani, P., & Kulkarni, N. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak: The disappointment in Indian teachers. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 102047. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102047

Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013, June 23–26). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Blessing, L. T. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM: a design research methodology. Springer.

Blundell, R., Costa, D. M., Joyce, R., & Xu, X. (2020). COVID-19 and inequalities. Fiscal Studies, 41, 291–319. doi:10.1111/1475-5890.12240

Bol, L., & Garner, J. K. (2011). Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education envi-ronments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 104–123. doi:10.1007/s12528-011-9046-7.

Browning, M. H., Larson, L. R., Sharaievska, I., Rigolon, A., McAnirlin, O., Mullenbach, L., Reigner, N. (2021). Psychological impacts from COVID-19 among university students: Risk factors across seven states in the United States. PLoS ONE, 16, e0245327. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245327

Brusilovsky, P., Somyurek, S., Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Zadorozhny, V., & Durlach, P. J. (2016). Open social student modeling for personalized learning. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 4(3), 450–461. doi:10.1109/TETC.2015.2501243.

Bull, S. (2010). Features of an independent open learner model influencing uptake by university students. In P. De Bra, A. Kobsa, & D. Chin (Eds.), User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personali-zation (pp. 393–398). Springer.

Bull, S. (2016). Negotiated learner modelling to maintain today’s learner models. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 10. doi:10.1186/s41039-016-0035

Bull, S., Brusilovsky, P., & Guerra, J. (2018, September 3-5). Which learning visualisations to offer students?. In Lifelong Technology-Enhanced Learning: 13th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2018, Leeds, UK, Proceedings 13 (pp. 524-530). Springer International Publishing.

Cantamessa, M. (2003). An Empirical Perspective Upon Design Research. Journal of Engineering De-sign, 14(1), 1–15.

Capperucci, D., Scierri, I. D. M., Salvadori, I., Batini, F., Toti, G., Barbisoni, G., & Pera, E. (2022). Remote teaching during COVID-19 Emergency: Teaching and assessment strategies and the role of previous training. Education Sciences, 12(10), 646.

Ceylan, S., Pınar, S., Seçmen, S., & Somer, M. E. (2021). An evaluation of online architectural design studios during COVID-19 outbreak. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(1), 203-218. doi:10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0230

Chadha, D. (2006). A curriculum model for transferable skills development. Engineering Education, 1, 19–24.

Chunxia, D. (2021). Design of online volleyball remote teaching system based on AR technology. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60, 4299–4306. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.023

Costado Dios, M. T., & Piñero Charlo, J. C. (2021). Face-to-Face vs. e-learning models in the COVID-19 Era: Survey Research in a Spanish University. Educ. Sci., 11, 293. doi:10.3390/educsci11060293

Cross, N. (2018). Expertise in professional design. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 372–388). Cambridge University Press.

Daalhuizen, J., & Cash, P. (2021). Design method content theory: towards a new understanding of methods in design. Design Studies, 75, 101019. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2021.101018

Daalhuizen, J., Badke-Schaub, P., & Batill, S. M. (2009). Dealing with uncertainty in design practice: issues for design-centered methodology. In The Proceedings of the International Conference on Design Engineering, ICED’09 (pp. 147-158).

Daalhuizen, J., Person, O., & Gattol, V. (2014). A personal matter? An investigation of students' design process experiences when using a heuristic or a systematic method. Design Studies, 35(2), 133-159.

Daalhuizen, J., Timmer, R., Welie, M. VD., & Gardien, P. (2019). An architecture of design doing: a framework for capturing the ever-evolving practice of design to drive organizational learning. International Journal of Design, 13(1), 37–52.

Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., Hein, J., Janke, S., Dickhauser, O., & Dresel, M. (2021). Shifting from face-to-face to online teaching during COVID-19: the role of university faculty achievement goals for attitudes towards this sudden change, and their relevance for burnout/engagement and student evaluations of teaching quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106677. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106677

De-Araujo, J., & Claudiano, S. (2001). Acquisition of product development tools in industry: a theo-retical contribution [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Technical University of Denmark.

Debacq, M., Almeida, G., Lachin, K., Lameloise, M.-L., Lee, J., Pagliaro, S., Romdhana, H., & Roux, S. (2021). Delivering remote food engineering labs in COVID-19 time. Education for Chemical Engineers, 34, 9-20. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.10.002

Edward, L. (2020). The Pandemic Could Open a Door to New Technology and Dramatic Innovation in Education. Berkeley News. Retrieved from https://news.berkeley.edu/2020/05/27/the-pandemic-could-open-a-door-to-new-technology-and-dramatic-innovation-in-education/

El-Ariss, B., Zaneldin, E., & Ahmed, W. (2021). Using videos in blended e-learning for a structural steel design course. Educ. Sci., 11, 290. doi:10.3390/educsci11060290

Emam, M., Taha, D., & ElSayad, Z. (2018). Collaborative pedagogy in architectural design studio: a case study in applying collaborative design. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 163–170. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2018.03.005

Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2020). Learning Inequality during the COVID-19 Pandemic. SocArXiv. Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/ve4z7/

Fewella, L. N. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 on distance learning practical design courses. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-24. doi:10.1007/s10798-023-09674-6

Fleischmann, K. (2022). A paradigm shift in studio pedagogy during pandemic times: An international perspective on challenges and opportunities teaching design online. Journal of Design, Business & Society, 8(2), 247-272. doi:10.1386/dbs_00054_1

Fojtík, R. (2018). Problems of distance education. ICTE Journal, 7(1), 14–23.

Gamage, K. A. A., Gamage, A., & Dehideniya, S. C. P. (2022). Online and hybrid teaching and learning: enhance effective student engagement and experience. Educ. Sci., 12(10), 651. doi:10.3390/educsci12100651

Gamage, K. A., Wijesuriya, D. I., Ekanayake, S. Y., Rennie, A. E., Lambert, C. G., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery of teaching and laboratory practices: Continuity of University Pro-grammes during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Sci., 10, 291. doi:10.3390/educsci10100291

Ghasem, N., & Ghannam, M. (2021). Challenges, benefits & drawbacks of chemical engineering online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, 107–114. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.10.002

Goldschmidt, G., & Tatsa, D. (2005). How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Design Studies, 26(6), 593-611.

González-Lloret, M. (2021). Online collaboration through tasks for L2 pragmatic development. In Working Collaboratively in Second/Foreign Language Learning (pp. 199-216). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Frances, E. M., Gardner, D. G., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: next generation. Prevention Science, 16(7). doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x.

Grover, R., & Wright, A. (2023). Shutting the studio: the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on architectural education in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(3), 1173-1197.

Guohong, G., Ning, L., Wenxian, X., & Wenlong, W. (2012). The study on the development of internet-based distance education and problems. Energy Procedia, 17, 1362–1368. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.294

Hassanpour, B. (2023). Transformational contribution of technology to studio culture: experience of an online first-year architecture design studio during the COVID-19 pandemic. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 17(2), 393-408.

Hevner, A. R. (2007). A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scandinavian Journal of Infor-mation Systems, 19(2), 1-7.

Homan, G., & Macpherson, A. (2005). E‐learning in the corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(1), 75-90.

Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M., Saks, K., Leijen, A., Bardone, E., & Wang, M. (2020). Open learner models in supporting self-regulated learning in higher education: a systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 154, 103878.

IABFU (Imam Abdurehman bin Faisal University). (2022). Architecture Design III Course Description. Retrieved from https://www.iau.edu.sa/en/courses/design-iii on Sep 27, 2022.

Ibrahim, A. F., Ahmed, S. A., Bataineh, A. M., & Hikmat, H. A. (2021). Evaluation of the online teaching of architectural design and basic design courses: case study—college of architecture at JUST, Jordan. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12, 2345–2353. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.028

Iqbal, H., Sheikh, A. K., & Samad, M. A. (2014, April 3–5). Introducing CAD/CAM and CNC machining by using a feature based methodology in a manufacturing lab course, a conceptual framework. In Pro-ceedings of the 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Istanbul, Türkiye. doi:10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826226

Janssen, L. (2020). How COVID-19 Exposed Challenges for Technology in Education. GSTIC Expert Story. Retrieved from https://www.gstic.org/expert-story/how-covid-19-has-exposed-the-challenges-for-technology-in-education/

Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 29–49.

Katsavounidou, G. (2022). Distance teaching urban design and planning studio courses during the pandemic: challenges and lessons learnt. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1-13. doi:10.1177/0739456X221084992

Klawitter, A. (2022). Challenges students face with online learning in 2022. Retrieved from https://meratas.com/blog/5-challenges-students-face-with-remote-learning/

Kolata, S. (2020). Online pedagogy: how to teach hands-on architecture and design courses virtually. March 15, 2020. Retrieved from https://sarakolata.medium.com/online-pedagogy-how-to-teach-hands-on-architecture-and-design-courses-virtually-3e178e0d0ff5

Lambert, C. G., & Rennie, A. E. W. (2021). Experiences from COVID-19 and emergency remote teaching for entrepreneurship education in engineering programmes. Educ. Sci., 11, 282. doi:10.3390/educsci11060282

Larenas, D., Claudio H., Andrea Victoria Rodríguez Moran, & Karen Jocelyn Poblete Rivera. (2011). Comparing teaching styles and personality types of EFL instructors in the public and private Sectors. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 13(1), 111–127.

Leung, J. K., & Chu, S. K. (2020). Inspiring Makers in First-Year Engineering under Emergency Remote Teaching. Adv. Eng. Educ., 8(4). doi:10.11120/aee.2020.08040043

Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003.

Lueth, P. L. O. (2008). The architectural design studio as a learning environment: A qualitative explo-ration of architecture design student learning experiences in design studios from first-through fourth-year. Iowa State University.

Lyon, P. (2016). Design education: Learning, teaching and researching through design. CRC Press.

Maulam, N., Israel, E., & Max, D. (2022). Moving to online planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: an assessment of zoom and the impact of ict on planning boards’ discussions. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1-20. doi:10.1177/0739456X221105811

McAllister, K. (2010). The design process – making it relevant for students. International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2/3), 76–89.

Medina, M. B. E. (2015). Influencia de la interacción alumno-docente en el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje. Paakat: Revista de Tecnología y Sociedad, 8. Retrieved from http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/paakat/index.php/paakat/article/view/230/347

Mohammadi, H., Monadjemi, S. A., Moallem, P., & Olounabadi, A. A. (2008). E-learning system development using an open-source customization approach. Journal of Computer Science, 4(5), 360. doi:10.3844/jcssp.2008.144.152

Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course 'forced' online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 609-611. doi:10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205

Mostafanezhad, M. (2020). Covid-19 is an unnatural disaster: Hope in revelatory moments of crisis. Tour. Geogr., 22, 639–645. doi:10.1080/14616688.2020.1779218

Mostafanezhad, M. (2020). Covid-19 is an unnatural disaster: Hope in revelatory moments of crisis. Tourism Geographies, 22, 639–645. doi:10.1080/14616688.2020.1744495

Murray, A., Fox, J., Sleight, J., & Oldfield, P. (2023). The online studio: cultures, perceptions and questions for the future. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 42(1), 108-124. doi:10.1111/jade.12410

Mushtaha, E., Abu Dabous, S., Alsyouf, I., Oda, A., & Raafat Abdraboh, N. (2022). The challenges and opportunities of online learning and teaching at engineering and theoretical colleges during the pandemic. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13, 101770. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2022.101770

Muzammıl, M., Sutawıjaya, A., & Harsası, M. (2020). Investigating student satisfaction in online learning: the role of student interaction and engagement in distance learning university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21, 88–96.

Naqvi, S. (2012). Methods of Teaching. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC). United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Retrieved from https://hec.gov.pk/english/services/universities/RevisedCurricula/Documents/2011-2012/Education/MethodsTeaching_Sept13.pdf

Noviana, M., Sukardi, S., & Suryanti, N. M. N. (2020). Learning process during Covid-19 pandemic from various variables in senior high school. SAR Journal, 3, 160–165.

Ortiz, P. A. (2020). Teaching in the time of COVID-19. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(3), 201. doi:10.1002/bmb.21348

Prahani, Binar Kurnia; Suprapto, Nadi; Rachmadiarti, Fida; Sholahuddin, Arif; Mahtari, Saiyidah; Suyidno; Siswanto, Joko. (2021). Online scientific creativity learning (OSCL) in science educa-tion to improve students' scientific creativity in COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(spec iss), 77-90..

Prince, N. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223–231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Putri, A. H., Samsudin, A., & Suhandi, A. (2022). Exhaustive studies before covid-19 pandemic attack of students’ conceptual change in science education: a literature review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 808-829.

Raturi, S. (2010). Learners’ satisfaction of, and preference for, different instructional delivery modes: A case study from the University of the South Pacific (USP). Suva, Central, Fiji.

Ripoll, V., Godino-Ojer, M., Calzada, J., Alqurshi, A., Debacq, M., Almeida, G., Lachin, K., Lameloise, M.-L., Lee, J., Pagliaro, S., Romdhana, H., & Roux, S. (2021). Investigating the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on pharmaceutical education in Saudi Arabia– a call for a remote teaching contin-gency strategy. Educ. Chem. Eng., 34, 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.11.001

Rodríguez, C. L., Mula, J., Segovia, J. D., & Cruz-González, C. (2021). The effects of covid-19 on science education: A thematic review of international research. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(Covid-19 Special Issue), 26-45.

Rosa, C., & Ferreira, J. (2023). The distant studio: a survey of design students’ experience with distance educational formats. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-25. doi:10.1007/s10798-023-09673-7

Sajid, M. J. (2020). Online Teaching in the Age of COVID-19: A Case of Personal Experience. In Materials of the International Online Distance Conference On Modern Informatics and Its Teaching Methods.

Schön, D. A. (2015). Learning to design and designing to learn. NA, 6(1). Retrieved from http://arkitekturforskning.net/na/article/viewFile/767/711 on May 21, 2023.

Shariatrad, F., Doostabadi, M. A., Dehbandi, R., & Senemari, F. (2022). Factors affecting online education of architectural design studio. Soffeh, 32, 9-14. doi:10.52547/SOFEH.2021.220904.1014

Shim, T. E., & Lee, S. Y. (2020). College students’ experience of emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105578. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105578

Son, C., Hegde, S., Smith, A., Wang, X., & Sasangohar, F. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on college students’ mental health in the United States: interview survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22, e21279. doi:10.2196/21279

Swart, W., & MacLeod, K. (2021). Evaluating learning space designs for flipped and collaborative learning: a transactional distance approach. Educ. Sci., 11, 292. doi:10.3390/educsci11060292

Talbot, R. (2020). How Much Research Has Been Done on Flipped Learning? 2020 Update for 2020. Retrieved from http://rtalbert.org/how-much-research-has-been-done-on-flipped-learning-update-for-2020/

Thomas, M. S., & Rogers, C. (2020). Education, the science of learning, and the COVID-19 crisis. Pro-spects, 49, 87–90. doi:10.1007/s11125-020-09495-w

Ting, D. S., Carin, L., Dzau, V., & Wong, T. Y. (2020). Digital technology and COVID-19. Nature Medicine, 26, 459–461. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0824-5

Ulrich, K., & Eppinger, S. (2015). Product design and development. McGraw Hill Education.

UNESCO. (2022). COVID-19 Recovery: Education: from school closure to Recovery (Feb 2020- June 2022) [Website]. Retrieved May 23, 2023, from https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/education-response

Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34, 302–323. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835779.

Wong, M. H. J., Mohamed, R. N. S. B., Raja Mohd Yazit, R. N. S. B., & Ho, J. C. Y. (2023). Challenges Faced by Students in Online Architectural Design Studio During COVID-19 Pandemic: Univer-sities in Sarawak. In Advances in Civil Engineering Materials (pp. 81-91). doi:10.1007/978-981-19-8024-4_7

Yaeger, P. M. (2002). Innovations and outcomes in engineering education: Active learning in dynamics classes. The Pennsylvania State University.

Yazit, M., & Ho, J. C. Y. (2023). Challenges Faced by Students in Online Architectural Design Studio During COVID-19 Pandemic: Universities in Sarawak. In Advances in Civil Engineering Mate-rials (pp. 81-91). doi:10.1007/978-981-19-8024-4_7

Yesiloglu, Sevinç Nihal; Gençer, Sinem; Ekici, Funda; Isik, Burcu. Examining Pre-Service Teachers' Views about Online Chemistry Laboratory learning experiences amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(special issue) , 108-124.

Zhang, L. (2008). Teachers’ Styles of Thinking: An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Psychology, 142(1), 37–55.