Promoting students’ conceptual change by ıntegrating the 3-2-1 reading technique with refutation text in the physics learning of buoyancy

Authors

  • Tomo Djudin Physics Education Department of Education and Teacher Training Faculty, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, West Kalimantan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

3-2-1 reading technique, refutation text, conceptual change

Abstract

The conceptual change is assumed a potential teaching pedagogy to prepare  the skills for anticipating 21th century. This quasy-experimental method with pre-and posttest control group design was applied to examine the effectiveness of integrating 3-2-1 reading technique with refutation text on students’ conceptual change of buoyancy.The subjects consist of 39 eleventh grade students of senior high school which was drawn by using intact group random sampling technique.The diagnostic test consists of nine items of multiple choice with two distractors which followed by  supporting reasons was administered. The study found various profiles of students’ misconseptions of buoyancy. The reduction of students’ misconceptions after the treatment was 54,71 %. A significant conceptual change of buoyancy was occured among  students after the treatment. The extent of effectiveness of the treatment was high category (gain  mean = 0,82). A science  teaching should intentionally model a  conceptual change strategy in  schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alsamadani, H. (2011). The effect the 3-2-1 reading strategy on EFL reading comprehension. Journal of English Language Teaching,4(3),184-191.

Armbruster et al. (1991). Teaching text structure to improve reading and writing. Science Education, 26(8), 130-137.

Apeng, B. (2009). Penyediaan bacaan berbentuk refutation text untuk meremediasi kesalahan konsep Siswa tentang pemantulan cahaya pada cermin di kelas VIII SMP Negeri 6 Pontianak. Skripsi. Pontianak: FKIP Untan.

Barton, M.L., & Jordan, D.L. (2001). Teaching reading in science: A Supplement toteaching reading in the content areas: If not me, then who?.2nd Edition. McREL (Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning).

Besson, U. (2004). Students’ conceptions of fluids. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14),1683-1714.

Bond et al. (1994). Reading Difficulties: Their Diagnosis and Correction, Allyn & Bacon, Inc.

Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., & Reynolds, R. E. (2010). The nature of the refutation text effect: An investigation of attention allocation. The Journal of Educational Research, 9(103), 407-423.

Cavas, B. (2015). Research trends in science education international: A content analysis for the last five years (2011-2015). Science Education International,25(4),573-588.

Chang, Y.H. & Chang, C.Y. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology,19(4),315–331.

Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Common sense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, (2),161–199.

Chrzanowski, M. M., Grajkowski, W., Żuchowski, S., Spalik, K., & Ostrowska, E.B. (2018). Vernacular misconceptions in teaching science –types and causes. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(4),29-54.

Coetzee, A. & Imenda, S. N. (2012). Alternative conceptions held by first year physics students at a South African University of Technology concerning interference and diffraction of waves. Research in Higher Education Journal, 9(4), 112-120.

Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3rd ed. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Gunstone, R. F. & White, R. T. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education,65(3),291-299.

Graesser, A.C. (2007). An Introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. McNamara (ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies (pp. 3-26). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hanson, R. & Seheri-Jele, N. (2018). Assessing conceptual change instruction accompanied with concept maps and analogies: A case of acid-base strengths. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(4), 55-64.

Harniyati, M. (2015). Remediasi miskonsepsi siswa pada fluida statis menggunakan pembelajaran Predict, Observe, dan Explain di SMA. Skripsi. Pontianak: FKIP Untan.

Kendeou, P. &van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory andCognition,3(7),1567-1577.

Kostons, D. &Van der Werf, G. (2015). The Effects of activating prior topic and metacognitive knowledge on text comprehension scores. British Journal of Educational Psychology,85(3),264-275.

Kural, M. &Kocakülah, M.S. (2016). Teaching for hot conceptual change: Towards a new model, beyond the cold and warm ones.European Journal of Education Studies, 2(8),1-40.

Laidlaw et al. (1993). The Effects of notetaking and self-questioning on quiz performance. Science Education, 77(9).75-82.

Lassonde et al. (2016). Refutation texts overcoming psychology misconceptions that resistant to change. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Psychology,2(1),62-67.

Mulyani, R. (2015). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) berbantuan refutation text terhadap peningkatan pemahaman konsep dan penurunan kuantitas miskonsepsi siswa SMP pada materi fluida statis. Disertasi. Bandung: SPs-UPI.

Nussbaum et al. (2017). Refutation texts for effective climate change education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 3(1), 23-24.

Palk, S., Song, G., Kim, S. & Ha, M.(2017). Developing a four-level learning progression and assessment for the concept of buoyancy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 3(8),4965–4986.

Palmer, D.H. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 8(5),663-684.

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of a conceptual change, Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.

Putri, A.N., Apen, R. & Wahyuni, D. (2017). The effect of using 3-2-1 strategy toward students’ reading comprehension ability at SMPN 34 Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 12-19.

Radovanović, J., Sliško, J. & Stepanović Ilić, I. (2019). Active learning of buoyancy: An effective way to change students’ alternative conceptions about floating and sinking. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1286:012011. Childrens’ misconceptions and conceptual change in science education. [Online]. http://www. acell.chem.usyd.ceo/conceptual-change.cfm

Savinainen, A., &Scott, P. (2002). The force concept inventory: A Tool for monitoring student learning. Physics Education, 3(1), 45-52.

Saavedra, A., & Opfer, V. (2012). Teaching and learning 21th century skills: Lessons from the learning sciences.Asia Society: A Global Cities Education Network Report.

Schroeder, N. L. (2016). A Preliminary investigation of the influences of refutation text and instructional design. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning,21(3),325–340.

Sesilia, S. (2016). The effectiveness of 3-2-1 Strategy in teaching reading comprehension on narrative text. Skripsi. Pontianak: FKIP Untan.

Siegel, S. (1997). Statistik Nonparametrik untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. (Penterjemah: Suyuti, Z. & Simatupang, L.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sinatra, G. M. & Broughton, S. H. (2011). Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutation text. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4),374-393.

Snow, C., Burns, S. & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.

Spiegel, G.F & Barufaldi, J.P. (1994), The effects of combination of text structure awareness and graphics post organizers on recall and retention of science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4),913-932.

Stylos et al. (2008). Misconceptions on classical mechanics by freshman university students: A case study in a physics department in Greece. Science and Technology Education, 1(2),157-177.

Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika.Grasindo.

Suskavcevic, G.R. (2005). Understanding of static of fluids. Paper Presented at SUN Conference, El Paso TX, March 3-5, 2005.

Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6),951-970.

Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early intervention in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15(1), 55-64.

Treagust, D. F. (2007). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.

Utami, R. (2014). Remediasi miskonsepsi pada fluida statis melalui model pembelajaran TGT berbantuan Mind Mapping di SMA. Skripsi.Pontianak: FKIP Untan.

Weimer, M. (2014). Getting Students to do the reading. [Online]. http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-teaching-strategies/getting -students-to-do-the-reading/

Westwood, P. (2007). Reading and Learning Difficulties: Approaches to Teaching and Assessment. ACER Press.

Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. (2008). Diagnosing and dealing with students’ misconception: Floating and sinking. Science Scope, 31(8), 34-39.

Zygouris-Coe, V., Wiggins, M. B., & Smith. L. H. (2005). Engaging students with texts: The 3-2-1 strategy. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 381-384.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

Published

02.07.2021

How to Cite

Djudin, T. . (2021). Promoting students’ conceptual change by ıntegrating the 3-2-1 reading technique with refutation text in the physics learning of buoyancy. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 290-303. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 235

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.