The Effects of STEM education on scientific process skills and STEM awareness in simulation based ınquiry learning environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/Keywords:
STEM, inquiry learning, computer simulation, scientific process skills, awarenessAbstract
In this study, the effects of STEM education in the simulation–based inquiry learning (SBIL) environment on the students' scientific process skills and STEM awareness were investigated. In addition, the use of simulations in STEM education was discussed by evaluating students' views on activities. Study group of the research consists of 39 students enrolled in science teaching undergraduate program at a university in Turkey. Results of the study showed that STEM education performed in the SBIL environment has a positive effect on the development of scientific process skills and STEM awareness. The students expressed a positive opinion on the STEM education that it provided the development of scientific process skills and increased their attitude and motivation towards the course. The students stated that the simulation program used in the STEM activities provided important advantages such as designing and developing engineering products, experiments and reducing errors.
Downloads
References
Bakırcı, H., & Kutlu, E. (2018). Determination of Science Teachers’ views on STEM Approach. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(2), 367-389.
Bektas, O , & Aslan, F. (2019). Determination of pre-service science teachers’ views regarding stem applications. Maarif Mektepleri Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 17-50.
Bell, T., Urhahne D., Schanze S., & Ploetzner R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349377, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802582241.
Bilgin, B. (2006). The effects of hands-on activities incorporating a cooperative learning approach on eight grade students’ science process skills and attitudes toward science. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 1(9), 27-37.
Breiner, J.M., Johnson, C.C., Harkness, S.S., & Koehler, C.M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112 (1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Burns, J. C., Okey, J. C., & Wise, K. (1985). Development of an integrated porcess skills test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 22(2), 169- 177. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220208
Buyruk, B., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2014). STEM Awareness Scale (SAS): Validity and reliability study. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10179a
Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329(5995), 996-996. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
Cavlazoglu, B., & Stuessy, C. (2017). Changes in science teachers' conceptions and connections of STEM concepts and earthquake engineering. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 239-254.
Cayvaz, A., Akcay, H., & Kapici, H.O. (2020). Comparison of simulation-based and textbook-based instructions on middle school students’ achievement, inquiry skills and attitude. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 8(1), 34-43.
Cooper, R., & Heaverlo, C. (2013). Problem solving and creativity and design: What influence do they have on girls’ interest in STEM subject areas? American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 27-38.
Crippen, K. J., & Archambault, L. (2012). Scaffolded inquiry-based instruction with technology: A signature pedagogy for STEM education. Computers in the Schools, 29(1-2), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.658733
Çepni, S. (2018). Kuramdan uygulamaya STEM eğitimi. Ankara, Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
Çınar, S., Pırasa, N., Uzun, N. & Erenler, S. (2016). The effect of STEM education on preservice science teachers’ perception of interdisciplinary education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(special), 118-142.
D’Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., and Haertel, G. (2014). Simulations for STEM Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Executive Summary. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Darrah, M., Humbert, R., Finstein, J., Simon, M., & Hopkins, J. (2014). Are virtual labs as effective as hands-on labs for undergraduate physics? A comparative study at two major universities. Journal of science education and technology, 23(6), 803-814.
Erdogan, I., & Ciftci, A. (2017). Investigating the views of pre-service science teachers on stem education practices. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(5), 1055-1065.
Geban, Ö., Aşkar, P. & Özkan, İ. (1992). effects of computer simulation and problem solving approaches on high school. Journal of Educational Research. 86(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941821
Gerber, B. L., Price, C., Barnes, M., Hinkle, V., Barnes, L., Gordon, P., et al. (2003). Excellence in rural science teaching: Examining elements of professional development models. In Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Gökbayrak, S., & Karışan, D. (2017). Exploration of Sixth Grade Students’ Views on STEM Based Activities. Journal of Subject Teaching Research, 3(1), 25-40.
Gül, K. S., & Taşar, M. F. (2020). A review of researches on STEM in preservice teacher education. Elementary Education Online, 19(2), 515-539.
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, N.V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Huppert, J., Lomask, S. M., & Lazarowitz, R. (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: Students’cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 803-821.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049150
Hutton, D. G., & Baumeister, R. F. (1992). Self-Awareness and Attitude Change: Seeing Oneself on the Central Route to Persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181010
Imaduddin, M. & Hidayah, F. F. (2019). Redesigning laboratories for pre-service chemistry teachers: from cookbook experiments to inquiry-based science, environment, technology, and society approach. Journal of Turkish Science Education,16(4),489-507.
Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E. & Moore, T. J. (Eds.). (2016). STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & quantity, 43(2), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
Li, Q., Moorman, L., & Dyjur, P. (2010). Inquiry-based learning and e-mentoring via videoconference: A study of mathematics and science learning of Canadian rural students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 729-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9156-3
Lim, B. R. (2004). Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the Web. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 627-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.00071013.2004.00419.x
Lim, C. H., & Oh, B. J. (2015). Elementary pre-service teachers and in-service teachers’ perceptions and demands on STEAM education. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 8(1), 1-11.
Locke, E. (2009). Proposed model for a streamlined, cohesive, and optimized K-12 STEM curriculum with a focus on engineering. Journal of Technology Studies, 35(2), 23-35.
Lord, T., & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/10.2307/4452009
Mcdonald, Cv. (2016). STEM education: a review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4), 530-569.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd Edition). California: SAGE Publications.
Morrison, J., & Raymond Bartlett, V. (2009). STEM as curriculum. Education Week, 23, 28– 31.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for k-12 science education:
practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.
Njoo, M., & De Jong, T. (1993). Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: Learning processes and instructional support. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 821-844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300803
Özbilen, A. (2018). Teacher opinions and awareness about stem education. Scientific Educational Studies, 2 (1), 1-21.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pinelli, T. E., & Haynie III, W. J. (2010). A Case for the Nationwide Inclusion of Engineering in the K-12 Curriculum via Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 21(2), 52-68.
Rushton, G., Lotter, C., & Singer, J. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ emerging expertise in inquiry teaching: the effect of a professional development model on beliefs and practice. Journal of Science Teachers’ Education, 22, 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972010-9224-x
Rutten, N., Joolingen, W. R., & Van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58, 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science. SpringerPlus, 4(8), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2015). Exploring effectiveness of simulation-based inquiry learning in science with integration of formative assessment. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(3), 323-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0037-y
Srisawasdi, N., Kerdcharoen, T., & Suits, J. P. (2008). Turning scientific laboratory research into innovative instructional material for science education: Case studies from practical experience. International Journal of Learning, 15(5).
Strong, M. G. (2013). Developing elementary math and science process skills through engineering design instruction. Hofstra University.
Suratno, Wahono, B., Chang, C-Y., Retnowati, A., & Yushardi. (2020). Exploring a Direct Relationship between Students’ Problem-Solving Abilities and Academic Achievement: A STEM Education at a Coffee Plantation Area. Journal of Turkish Science Education,17(2), 211-224.
Uysal, E. & Cebesoy, Ü.B. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of design-based STEM activities on pre-service science teachers’ science process skills attitudes and knowledge. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 7(1), 60-81.
Van Zee, E. H., & Roberts, D. (2006). Making science teaching and learning visible through web-based “snapshots of practice”. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 367388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9027-2
Wang, H. (2012). A New Era of Science Education: Science Teachers’ Perceptions and Classroom Practices of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13.
Wendell, K. B., Connolly, K. G., Wright, C. G., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., Barnett, M., & Marulcu, I. (2010). Incorporating engineering design into elementary school science curricula. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Exposition, Louisville, KY.
Wu, Y. & Anderson, O.R. (2015). Technology-enhanced STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(3), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0041-2
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Downloads
Issue
Section
Published
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
