The role of time in the use of visualization in chemical education: Pre-service teacher practices
pre-service teacher practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/Keywords:
Chemistry teacher education, time utilisation, visualizationAbstract
This exploratory study investigated the relationships between time utilisation and the use of visual resources, supported by audiovisual records of the practices of pre-service chemistry teachers applying Teaching-Learning Sequences. The content analysis was based on analytical categories found in the scientific literature. The results showed a positive association between increased time spent using visualizations, diversification of pupils’ actions, and the quality of the students’ verbal interactions, through the predominance of conceptualisations in the submicro domain, with transitions between the macro and submicro domains. This study reinforces the importance of reflecting on the different ways of using visualizations in classroom time during chemistry teacher education, and the challenges of building and implementing chemistry teaching practices with scientific visualizations that are more integrated into the school curriculum.
Downloads
References
Adu Gyamfi, K. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ conception of an effective science teacher: The case of initial teacher training. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.12
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153
Akaygun, S., & Adadan, E. (2019). Revisiting the understanding of redox reactions through critiquing animations in variance. In M. Schultz, S. Schmid, & G. A. Lawrie (Eds.), Research and practice in chemistry education (pp. 07–29). Springer.
Bannatyne, M. W. M., Koch, C. T., & Piekarzewska, A. K. (2019, July 16-19). If you could believe your eyes: Images and fake news [Paper presentation]. 23rd International Conference in Information Visualization: Part II, (pp. 128-133). Adelaide, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV-2.2019.00034 Bardin, L. (2011). An{lise de conteúdo [Content analysis]. Edições 70.
Chang, H.-Y., & Linn, M. C. (2013). Scaffolding learning from molecular visualizations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(07), 858–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21089
Colin, P., Chauvet, F., & Viennot, L. (2002). Reading images in optics: Students’ difficulties and teachers’ views. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 313–332.
Crary, J. (2016). 24/7: capitalismo tardio e os fins do sono [Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep]. Ubu.
Cepni , S., U lger, B. B., & Ormanci, U . (2017). Pre -service science teachers’ views towards the process of associating science concepts with everyday life. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 02-15. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10208a
Eilam, B. (2012). Teaching, learning and visual literacy: The dual role of visual representation. Cambridge Press.
Eilam, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014a). Teachers’ selections, construction, and use of visual representations. In B. Eilam & J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations (pp. 51–52). Springer.
Eilam, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014b). The significance of visual representations in the teaching of science. In B. Eilam & J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations (pp. 03–28). Springer.
Eilam, B., Poyas, Y., & Hashimshoni, R. (2014). Representing visually: What teachers know and what they prefer. In B. Eilam & J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations (pp. 53–83). Springer.
Ferk Savec, V., Hrast, Š., Devetak, I., & Torkar, G. (2016). Beyond the use of an explanatory key accompanying submicroscopic representations. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 63(4), 864–873. https://doi.org/10.17344/acsi.2016.2835
Ferreira, C. R., Baptista, M., & Arroio, A. (2011). Visual tools in teaching learning sequences for science education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 37, 48–58. http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstract.php?icid=971461
Geelan, D. R., & Fan, X. (2014). Teachers using interactive simulations to scaffold inquiry instruction in physical science education. In B. Eilam & J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations (pp. 249–270). Springer.
Harvey, D. (2008). Condição pós-moderna: Uma pesquisa sobre as origens da mudança cultural [The condition of postmodernity: Any enquiry into the origins of cultural change.]. Loyola.
Hinze, S. R., Rapp, D. N., Williamson, V. M., Shultz, M. J., Deslongchamps, G., & Williamson, K. C. (2013). Beyond ball-and-stick: Students’ processing of novel STEM visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 26, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.12.002
Hrast, Š., & Ferk Savec, V. (2017). The integration of submicroscopic representations used in Chemistry textbook sets into curriculum topics. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 64(4), 959–967. https://doi.org/10.17344/acsi.2017.3657
Hubber, P. (2013). Teacher perspectives of a representation construction approach to teaching science. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn in science (pp. 135–150). Sense Publishers.
Kelly, R. M., Akaygun, S., Hansen, S. J. R., & Villalta-Cerdas, A. (2017). The effect that comparing molecular animations of varying accuracy has on students’ submicroscopic explanations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00240D
Knoblauch, H., Schnettler, B., & Raab, J. (2012). Video analysis methodological aspects of interpretive audiovisual analysis in Social Research. In H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, & H.-G. Soeffner (Eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 09–26). Peter Lang.
Li, W. S. S., & Arshad, M. Y. (2014a). Application of multiple representation levels in redox reactions among tenth grade chemistry teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(3), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10117a
Li, W. S. S., & Arshad, M. Y. (2014b). Wait-Time and multiple representation levels in chemistry lessons. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 45–53. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086239.pdf
Li, W. S. S., & Arshad, M. Y. (2015). Inquiry practices in Malaysian secondary classroom and model of inquiry teaching based on verbal interaction. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 151–175. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1134665.pdf
Liv, N., & Greenbaum, D. (2020). Deep fakes and memory malleability: False memories in the service of fake news. AJOB Neuroscience, 11(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2020.1740351 Larrosa, J. (2018). Esperando não se sabe o quê [Waiting for the unknown]. Autêntica.
Locatelli, S., & Arroio, A. (2014). Metavisual strategy assisting the learning of initial concepts of electrochemistry. Natural Science Education, 01(39), 14–24. http://oaji.net/articles/2014/5141415817677.pdf
Loughran, J. (2014). Slowmation: A process of explicit visualization. In B. Eilam & J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations (pp. 85–102). Springer.
Loughran, J., Berry, A., Cooper, R., Keast, S., & Hoban, G. (2012). Preservice teachers learning about teaching for conceptual change through slowmation. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(01), 01–12.
Luckmann, T. (2012). Some remarks on scores in multimodal sequential analysis. In H. Knoblauch, B.
Schnettler, J. Raab, & H.-G. Soeffner (Eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 29–34). Peter Lang.
Mortimer, E. F., Scott, P. H. (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press.
Nitz, S., Ainsworth, S. E., Nerdel, C., & Prechtl, H. (2014). Do student perceptions of teaching predict the development of representational competence and biological knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 31, 13–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.003
Parnafes, O., & Trachtenberg-Maslaton, R. (2014). Transformed instruction: Teaching in a studentgenerated representations learning environment. In B. Eilam & J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations (pp. 271–290). Springer.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE.
Philipp, S. B., Johnson, D. K., & Yezierski, E. J. (2014). Development of a protocol to evaluate the use of representations in secondary chemistry instruction. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00098F
Pintó, R., & Ametller, J. (2002). Students’ difficulties in reading images: Comparing results from four national research groups. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 333–341.
Pinto, D. J. F., Siqueira, C. T., Reges, J. de S., Santos, V. C. dos, Arroio, A. (2014). Química dos cheiros: Uma abordagem multimodal para diagnóstico de concepções alternativas dos modelos expressos pelos alunos [Chemistry of smells: A multimodal approach to diagnosis of the misconceptions from the models expressed by students]. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Química, 09(01), 60–69.
Putranta, H., Supahar, Setiyatna H., Choiriyah, S., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Widodo, & Warsono (2021). The effect of smartphone usage intensity on high school students' higher order thinking skills in physics learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education 18(3), 421-438. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.82
Santos, V. C. dos, & Arroio, A. (2016). The representational levels: Influences and contributions to research in chemical education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10153a
Silva, A. J. P. da, & Arroio, A. (2021). Tempo e tecnologia no processo de visualização em Química: Um estudo exploratório sobre as pr{ticas de professores em formação inicial *Time and technology in the chemistry visualization process: An exploratory study on pre-service teacher practices]. Revista de Investigação Tecnológica em Educação em Ciências e Matem{tica. 01, 80-99. https://revistas.unila.edu.br/ritecima/article/view/3175/2782
Stylianidou, F. (2002). Analysis of science textbook pictures about energy and pupils’ readings of them. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110078905
Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry ‚triplet‛. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435
Tasker, R., & Dalton, R. (2006). Research into practice: Visualisation of the molecular world using animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 7(2), 141-159.
Tasker, R., Dalton, R., Sleet, R., Bucat, B., Chia, B., & Corrigan, D. (2003). VisChem: Reflections. Retrieved March 29, 2019, from: http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/exemplars/info/LD9/more/05Reflections.html
Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
Tytler, R., Hubber, P., & Prain, V. (2013). Structuring learning sequences. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn in science (pp. 51–66). Sense Publishers.
Tytler, R., Hubber, P., Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2013). A representation construction approach. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn in science (pp. 31–50). Sense Publishers.
Vries, M. G.; Arroio, A. (2017, September 5-8) Construindo atividades de modelagem sobre a estrutura e transformação da matéria em sala de aula: uma an{lise sobre suportes necess{rios *Paper presentation]. X Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en Did{ctica de las Ciencias, (pp. 4421– 4426). Sevilla, Spain.
Waldrip, B., & Prain, V. (2013). Teachers’ initial response to a representational focus. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn in science (pp. 15–30). Sense Publishers.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multi-modal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9157-6
Wu, H.-K. (2003). Linking the microscopic view of chemistry to real-life experiences: Intertextuality in a high-school science classroom. Science Education, 87(6), 868–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10090
Downloads
Issue
Section
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Turkish Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
