The Effect of "journey to literature survey and review" training on the research competencies of master students

Ümmühan Ormancı

doi:10.36681/tused.2023.042

Authors

Ümmühan Ormancı Dr.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.042

Keywords:

Literature review, master's student, research competencies

Abstract

In order to carry out effective research, Master’s degree students are expected to have a good command of the literature. They need to know how to carry out a literature review and how to synthesise the studies found as a result of the review and turn them into an article if desired. As the shortcomings made at this stage will affect the whole process of research, students should be given the necessary training. This study aims to examine the effect of “Journey to Literature Survey and Review” training on Master's degree students' research competencies. An embedded mixed methods design was used in this study. The study is part of the "Journey to Literature Survey and Review" project conducted under the TUBITAK 2237-A Grant Program for Scientific Training. The study group of the research was determined using the purposive sampling method. The study group consisted of 33 Master’s degree students from different universities and education departments. In the training information on how to conduct a literature review and present the studies obtained was delivered theoretically and practically. The experimental implementation process was carried out in the form of 6-day and 8-hour daily training sessions. The training sessions provided detailed information on what a literature review is, how to search databases, and types of reviews. These sessions were conducted by 12 academics who are experts in their fields. The "Competence in Research Scale" and "Opinion Form" were used as data collection tools in the study. The results of the study showed that the research competencies of the students increased significantly with the application. Looking at the averages for the sub-dimensions, it is clear that there is a large increase in the literature review and methods dimensions in particular. In this context, it can be suggested to increase similar training on sub-dimensions that will improve research competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulai, R. T., & Owusu-Ansah, A. (2014). Essential ingredients of a good research proposal for undergraduate and postgraduate students in the social sciences. Sage Open, 4(3), 1-15.

Akbulut, H. İ., Şahin, Ç., & Çepni, S. (2013). Determination of faced problems in doctorate thesis process: Education faculty sample. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 20, 50-69.

Akgün, Ö. E., & Güntaş, S. (2018). Investigating graduate students’ scientific research skills according to their advisors: Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus sample. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8(2), 131-144.

Ayas, A., Çepni, S., & Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2014). Methods, techniques and modelling that make students active in science courses. (Edt: S. Çepni). Science and technology teaching from theory to practice. PegemA Academy.

Balcı, A. (2016). Research methods, techniques and principles in social sciences. PegemA Academy.

Balcı, S. & Ahi, B. (2016). SPSS kullanma kılavuzu, SPSS ile adım adım veri analizi. (J. Pallant. SPSS survival manual A step by step guide to data analysis using ibm SPSS). Anı Publishing.

Barutçu, F., & Onaylı, S. (2016). Difficulties encountered in the thesis process. (Edtö. Demirel & S. Dinçer). Innovations in educational sciences and the search for quality. PegemA Academy.

Bayona-Ore, S. (2021). Perceptions of postgraduate students on the relationship between thesis development and performance of a supervisor. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 559-573.

Bell, J., & Waters, S. (2018). Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers. McGraw-hill education.

Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Garcia, V. L. (1996). The utility of the research self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 59-75.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1996). Research education in Turkish higher education. [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Ankara University.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1999). Research competences of primary school teachers. Educational Administration in Theory and Practicei, 18(18), 257-269.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., & Köklü, N. (1999). Advisors’ opinions about the research competencies of masters and doctorate students in educational sciences. Education and Science, 23(112), 18-28.

Çamur, Ö. (2008). The effect of case study method on student success in crew coordination course. [Unpublished Masters Thesis]. Hacettepe University.

Can, Ş., & Ceyhan, B. (2015). Opinions of post-graduate students of the institute of educational sciences about report writing and publishing (case of Muğla). Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Researches, 35, 43-53.

Çepni, S. (2018). Introduction to research and project studies. Celepler Printing.

Çepni, S. (2021). How to structure the conceptual and theoretical framework of projects, thesis and research articles? Journal of Science, Mathematics, Entrepreneurship and Technology Education, 4(3), 203-216.

Çepni, S. (2022). How to write the findings, discussion, conclusion, and recommendations sections in scientific studies? Journal of Science, Mathematics, Entrepreneurship and Technology Education, 5(2), 80-97.

Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Multivariate statistics for social sciences, SPSS and LISREL applications. PegemA Academy.

Council of Higher Education (YÖK) (2010). Higher education legislation, laws, decrees with the force of law, decisions of the council of ministers, regulations, other regulations. Hiperlink.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

Demirtaş, A. (1989). Knowledge and skills of university students in scanning written sources and report writing. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 4(4), 51-71.

Erdoğan, İ. (2001). Design and methodological problems of positivist-empirical academic research in social sciences. Anatolia: Journal of Tourism Research, 12(2), 119-134.

Faghihi, F., Rakow, E. A., & Ethington, C. (1999, April). A study of factors related to dissertation progress among doctoral candidates: focus on students' research self-efficacy as a result of their research training and experiences. American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

Frederiksen, L., & Phelps, S. F. (2018). Literature reviews for education and nursing graduate students. Rebus Community.

Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. Sage Publications.

Ismail, R., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2012). Evaluating the research competencies of doctoral students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 244-247.

İsnaç, F., & Doğan, C. D. (2017). Scaling the sections that graduate students have difficulty in the course of writing thesis proposal with pairwise comparison method. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(1), 16-28.

Jacobsen, M., McDermott, M., Brown, B., Eaton, S. E., & Simmons, M. (2018). Graduate students' research-based learning experiences in an online Master of Education program. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(4), 1-18.

Julien, B. L., Lexis, L., Schuijers, J., Samiric PhD, T., & McDonald PhD, S. (2012). Using capstones to develop research skills and graduate capabilities: A case study from physiology. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(3), 1-19.

Juntunen, M., & Lehenkari, M. (2021). A narrative literature review process for an academic business research thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 330-342.

Karadağ, E. (2010). Research models used in doctoral dissertations in the area of education sciences in Turkey: Quality of Research and Analytical Errors. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 1(1), 49-71.

Knopf, J. W. (2006). Doing a literature review. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(1), 127-132.

Kwan, B. S. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 30-55.

Lambie, G. W., Hayes, B. G., Griffith, C., Limberg, D., & Mullen, P. R. (2014). An exploratory investigation of the research self-efficacy, interest in research, and research knowledge of Ph. D. in education students. Innovative Higher Education, 39, 139-153.

Lederman, N. & Lederman, J. S. (2015). Editorial: What is a theoretical framework? A practical answer. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 593–597.

Leite, D. F., Padilha, M. A. S., & Cecatti, J. G. (2019). Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The literature review checklist. Clinics, 74, 1-8.

Leshchenko, M. P., Kolomiiets, A. M., Iatsyshyn, A. V., Kovalenko, V. V., Dakal, A. V., & Radchenko, O. O. (2021, March). Development of informational and research competence of postgraduate and doctoral students in conditions of digital transformation of science and education. In Journal of physics: Conference series (Vol. 1840, No. 1, p. 012057). IOP Publishing.

Meerah, T. S. M., Osman, K., Zakaria, E., Ikhsan, Z. H., Krish, P., Lian, D. K. C., & Mahmod, D. (2012). Measuring graduate students research skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 626-629.

Oliver, P. (2012). Succeeding with your literature review: A handbook for students. Open University Press.

Özkara, A. B. (2018). Investigation of research self-efficacy of post graduate students in sport sciences. Research in Sport Education and Sciences, 20(4), 52-59.

Pasupathy, R., & Siwatu, K. O. (2014). An investigation of research self-efficacy beliefs and research productivity among faculty members at an emerging research university in the USA. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 728-741.

Pickering, C., Grignon, J., Steven, R., Guitart, D., & Byrne, J. (2015). Publishing not perishing: How research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1756-1769.

Poyrazlı, Ş., & Şahin, A. E. (2010). Suggestions regarding the process of writing and publishing manuscripts in English for international journals. Education and Science, 34(151), 117-131.

Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Amin, A. S. (2014). Writing a literature review research paper: A step-by-step approach. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 3(1), 47-56.

Şahin, D., Calp, Ş., Bulut, P., & Kuşdemir, Y. (2013). Investigation of the graduate theses in the department of primary teacher education in terms of various criteria. Journal of World of Turks, 5(3), 187-205.

Şahin, S., Atasoy, B., & Somyürek, S. (2010). Cases method in teacher education. University of Gaziantep Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 253-277.

Saracaloğlu, A. S. (2008). The relationship between post graduate students' academic motivation level, research anxiety and attitudes with their research competence. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 5(2), 179-208.

Shahsavar, Z., & Kourepaz, H. (2020). Postgraduate students’ difficulties in writing their theses literature review. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1784620.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Toy, B. Y., & Tosunoğlu, N. G. (2007). Scientific research process, statistical techniques and mistakes in social research. Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Commerce and Tourism Education, 1, 1-20.

Wester, K. L., & Borders, L. D. (2014). Research competencies in counseling: A Delphi study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92(4), 447-458.

Xu, Z., Zhou, X., Kogut, A., & Clough, M. (2022). Effect of online research data management instruction on social science graduate students’ RDM skills. Library & Information Science Research, 44(4), 1-8.