Correcting grade 11 students’ misconceptions of the concept of force through the conceptual change model (CCM) with PDEODE*E tasks

Authors

  • Achmad Samsudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Aldi Zulfikar Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Duden Saepuzaman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Adam Hadiana Aminudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Andi Suhandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Supriyadi Supriyadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Bayram Coştu Yildiz Technical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Misconception, Force Concept, Conceptual Change Model (CCM) with PDEODE*E Tasks

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct Grade 11 students’ misconceptions about force through the Conceptual Change Model (CCM) making use of Predict, Discuss, Explain, Observe, Discuss, Explore, Explain (PDEODEE) tasks. This study was conducted using a mixed-method approach. The participants in this study were 65 students (33 students in the experiment class—13 males and 20 females, and 32 students in the control class—12 males and 20 females) from a high school in Bandung, Indonesia. The instrument test used is the Four-Tier Test-formed Force Concept Inventory (4TT-FCI) with 8 question items. Three analyses were carried out: an analysis of students' misconception profiles during the pre-test and post-test, the reconstruction of students’ misconceptions analysed based on percentage and codification using Great Change (GC), Not Change (NC), and Un-Great Change (U-GC). The improvement in students' conception was carried out using N-Gain with three categories (Low, Moderate, and High). The results show that the students' conception profile during the pre-test and post-test still detects misconceptions. However, these misconceptions can be ameliorated using CCM with PDEODEE tasks because the highest conceptual change is in the Misconceptions category (GC= 34.5) and the lowest is in the Un-Code category (U-GC= 2.4). The increase in the correctness of the conception was measured in the experimental class at 0.73 (High category), and the control class is 0.42 (Moderate Category).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adimayuda, R., Aminudin, A. H., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., & Author. (2020). A multitier open-ended momentum and impulse (MOMI) instrument: Developing and assessing quality of conception of 11th grade sundanese students with rasch analysis. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 4799–4804.

Aminudin, A. H., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Author., Coştu, B., & Adimayuda, R. (2019). Rasch Analysis of Multitier Open-ended Light-Wave Instrument (MOLWI): Developing and Assessing Second-Years Sundanese-Scholars Alternative Conceptions. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.574524

Aslan, A., & Demircioğlu, G. (2014). The Effect of Video-assisted Conceptual Change Texts on 12 th Grade Students’ Alternative Conceptions: The Gas Concept. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3115–3119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.718

Azizah, N., Author, & Sasmita, D. (2019). Development of computer simulation-assisted conceptual change model (CS-CCM) to change students’ conception on gas kinetic theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052036

Bao, L., & Fritchman, J. C. (2021). Knowledge integration in student learning of Newton’s third law: Addressing the action-reaction language and the implied causality. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 20116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020116

Chen, Y. L., Pan, P. R., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2013). Correcting misconceptions on electronics: Effects of a simulation-based learning environment backed by a conceptual change model. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 212–227.

Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 554–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110507

Costu, B. (2008). Learning Science through the PDEODE Teaching Strategy : Helping Students Make Sense of. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 3–9.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Ekawati, H., Islam, U., Ulum, D., & Education, M. (2021). Teams’ games tournaments with cognitive conflict instruction (CCI) model to unveil students’ misconceptions. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(4), 1343–1355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i4.5983

Eryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students’ misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10054

Feyzioğlu, E. Y., & Demirci, N. (2021). The Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Learner Autonomy and Conceptions of Learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.81

Fratiwi, N. J., Author, & Costu, B. (2018). Enhancing K-10 students’ conceptions through computer simulations-aided PDEODE*E (CS-PDEODE*E) on Newton’s Laws. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14229

Fratiwi, N. J., Author, Ramalis, T. R., Saregar, A., Diani, R., Irwandani, Rasmitadila, & Ravanis, K. (2020). Developing memori on Newton’s laws: For identifying students’ mental models. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.699

Gao, Y., Zhai, X., Andersson, B., Zeng, P., & Xin, T. (2020). Developing a Learning Progression of Buoyancy to Model Conceptual Change: A Latent Class and Rule Space Model Analysis. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1369–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9736-5

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316–1325. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18376

Handhika, J., Cari, Suparmi, & Sunarno, W. (2015). Exsternal representation to overcome misconception in physics. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education 2015, 2015(Icmse), 34–37. http://icmseunnes.com/2015/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/76_PE.pdf

Heddy, B. C., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transforming misconceptions: Using transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution. Science Education, 97(5), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21072

Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110506

Kaltakçi, D., & Didiç, N. (2007). Identification of pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions on gravity concept: A study with a 3-tier misconception test. AIP Conference Proceedings, 899, 499–500. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2733255

Kaniawati, I., Maulidina, W. N., Novia, H., Author, Aminudin, A. H., & Suhendi, E. (2021). Implementation of Interactive Conceptual Instruction (ICI) Learning Model Assisted by Computer Simulation: Impact of Students’ Conceptual Changes on Force and Vibration. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(22), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i22.25465

Kanli, U. (2014). A study on identifying the misconceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers about basic astronomy concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1120a

Kiray, S. A., & Simsek, S. (2021). Determination and Evaluation of the Science Teacher Candidates’ Misconceptions About Density by Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5

Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21022

Laurenty, F., Sulsilah, H., Amin, A. M., Author, & Rusdiana, D. (2021). Enhancing conceptual understanding via Diffraction Grating Innovative Media (DIAGRAM). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2098(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012013

Leinonen, R., Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Overcoming students’ misconceptions concerning thermal physics with the aid of hints and peer interaction during a lecture course. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020112

Lin, J. W., Yen, M. H., Liang, J. C., Chiu, M. H., & Guo, C. J. (2016). Examining the factors that influence students’ science learning processes and their learning outcomes: 30 years of conceptual change research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2617–2646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a

Lin, S. Y., & Singh, C. (2015). Effect of scaffolding on helping introductory physics students solve quantitative problems involving strong alternative conceptions. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020105

Lucariello, J., Tine, M. T., & Ganley, C. M. (2014). A formative assessment of students’ algebraic variable misconceptions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.09.001

Mutohhari, F., Sutiman, S., Nurtanto, M., Kholifah, N., & Author. (2021). Difficulties in implementing 21st century skills competence in vocational education learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.22028

Ozkan, G., & Selcuk, G. S. (2016). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of concepts related to pressure. European Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/5/055702

Parish, L., & Guilford, J. P. (1957). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 5(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.2307/3118885

Plomp, T. (1996). Teaching and Learning for the Future. Committee on Multimedia in Teacher Training, Final Report. (Vol. 139, Issue Reports-Descriptive).

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Polman, J., Hornstra, L., & Volman, M. (2021). The meaning of meaningful learning in mathematics in upper-primary education. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09337-8

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207

Premo, J., Cavagnetto, A., Honke, G., & Kurtz, K. J. (2019). Categories in conflict: Combating the application of an intuitive conception of inheritance with category construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21466

Prince, M., Vigeant, M., & Nottis, K. (2012). Development of the heat and energy concept inventory: Preliminary results on the prevalence and persistence of engineering students’ misconceptions. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 412–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00056.x

Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., Shekell, C., Cian, H., & Jacques, L. (2020). Connected Learning in STEAM Classrooms: Opportunities for Engaging Youth in Science and Math Classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1441–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10034-z

Rahmi, R. A., Author, & Imansyah, H. (2019). The development of PDEODE∗E task based three stay two stray on static fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052040

Author, Afif, N. F., Nugraha, M. G., Suhandi, A., Fratiwi, N. J., Aminudin, A. H., Adimayuda, R., Linuwih, S., & Costu, B. (2021). Reconstructing Students’ Misconceptions on Work and Energy through the PDEODE*E Tasks with Think-Pair-Share. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.56

Author, Aminudin, A. H., Fratiwi, N. J., Adimayuda, R., & Faizin, M. N. (2021). Measuring students’ conceptions of light waves: A survey in Central Java. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012124

Author, Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Kaniawati, I., & Coştu, B. (2017). Promoting conceptual understanding on magnetic field concept through interactive conceptual instruction (ICI) with PDEODE∗E tasks. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1205–1209. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7539

Savander-Ranne, C., & Kolari, S. (2003). Promoting the conceptual understanding of engineering students through visualisation. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 7(2), 189–200.

Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., & Kim, Y. J. (2013). Assessment and learning of qualitative physics in Newton’s playground. Journal of Educational Research, 106(6), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.832970

Smith, T. I., Wittmann, M. C., & Carter, T. (2014). Applying model analysis to a resource-based analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020102

Suhandi, A., Surtiana, Y., Husnah, I., Setiawan, W., Siahaan, P., Author, & Costu, B. (2020). Fostering high school students’ misconception about boiling concept using conceptual change laboratory (cCLAb) activity. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2211–2217. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080603

Taban, T., & Kiray, S. A. (2021). Determination of Science Teacher Candidates’ Misconceptions on Liquid Pressure with Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10224-8

Temiz, B. K., & Yavuz, A. (2014). Students’ misconceptions about Newton’s second law in outer space. European Journal of Physics, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/4/045004

Topalsan, A. K., & BAYRAM, H. (2019). Identifying Prospective Primary School Teachers’ Ontologically Categorized Misconceptions on the Topic of “Force and Motion.” Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10268a

Tortop, H. S. (2012). Awareness and misconceptions of high school students about renewable energy resources and applications: Turkey case. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(3), 1829–1840.

Turgut, U., & Gurbuz, F. (2012). Effect of conceptual change text approach on removal of students’ misconceptions about heat and temperature. In International Journal of Innovation and Learning (Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 386–403). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2012.047139

Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Nahadi, Author, Darman, D. R., Suherli, Z., Hasani, A., Leksono, S. M., Hendrayana, A., Suherman, Hidayat, S., Hamdani, D., & Coştu, B. (2017). Virtual Microscopic Simulation (VMS) to promote students’ conceptual change: A case study of heat transfer. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2).

Yang, D. C., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2021). Sixth Grade Students’ Performance, Misconception, and Confidence on a Three-Tier Number Sense Test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10051-3

Zhou, S., Wang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ PCK: Inconsistency of pre-service teachers’ predictions and student learning difficulties in newton’s third law. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1203a

Zulfikar, A., Saepuzaman, D., Novia, H., Setyadin, A. H., Jubaedah, D. S., Sholihat, F. N., Muhaemin, M. H., Afif, N. F., Fratiwi, N. J., Bhakti, S. S., Amalia, S. A., Hidayat, S. R., Nursani, Z., Hermita, N., Costu, B., & Author. (2019). Reducing Eleventh-Grade Students’ Misconceptions on Gravity Concept using PDEODE∗E-Based Conceptual Change Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1204(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/012026

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

Published

03.07.2024

How to Cite

Samsudin, A., Zulfikar , A., Saepuzaman , D., Aminudin , A. H., Suhandi, A., Supriyadi, S., & Coştu , B. (2024). Correcting grade 11 students’ misconceptions of the concept of force through the conceptual change model (CCM) with PDEODE*E tasks. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(2), 212-231. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Similar Articles

31-40 of 257

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)